Paid Sick Leave. Every employer must provide each of its employees at least one hour of paid sick leave for every 40 hours worked as an employee. An employee is entitled to use accrued paid sick leave beginning on the 90th calendar day after the commencement of employment.
Unused paid sick leave carries over to the following year, except that an employer is not required to allow an employee to carry over paid sick leave in excess of 40 hours. An employer is not required to provide financial or other reimbursement for accrued and unused paid sick leave to any employee upon the employee's termination, resignation, retirement, or other separation from employment. When there is a separation from employment and the employee is rehired within 12 months by the same employer, previously accrued unused paid sick leave must be reinstated and the previous period of employment counts for the purposes of determining the employee's eligibility to use paid sick leave.
Paid sick leave requirements do not apply to construction workers covered by a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) if:
Equivalent sick leave must meet the requirements in state law, except that the payment of leave may occur before usage.
Workers covered under the North American Industry Classification System code for construction, except for residential construction, that have not met the 90-day sick leave eligibility threshold at the time of separation must be paid the balance of their accrued and unused sick leave upon separation.
The committee recommended a different version of the bill than what was heard. PRO: Construction workers with short-term work can never use paid sick leave even when working full-time from job to job. Many construction workers change jobs prior to the 90 day threshold. The current system has many workers coming into the work under the weather because they cannot afford to miss a day of work. Apprentices, by design, move from employer to employer and do not meet the sick leave threshold. All workers in the state should have access to paid sick leave, which was the intent of the original initiative, but there is a gap between values and execution. State law already requires tracking of employees for tax purposes or if they return to the same employer, so there is no additional administrative burden.
CON: Sick leave provisions should be left to the bargaining table. State law allows for the negotiation of better sick leave benefits, and concerns about sick leave vesting can be addressed during collective bargaining negotiations. The bill could put union contractors at a competitive disadvantage. The bill may put an administrative burden on smaller contractors.
OTHER: Some technical changes are needed to make implementation easier, such as delaying the effective date for rulemaking. The bill references a calendar year while current rule allows them to decide what constitutes a year. Additionally, a cross-reference is needed to connect the bill to current law.