Health Care Benefit Managers. All health care benefit managers (HCBMs), including pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), must be registered by the Office of the Insurance Commissioner (OIC). Applications for registration must include the identity of the HCBM and the individuals and entities with a controlling interest in the HCBM, and whether the HCBM does business as a PBM or a different type of benefit manager, in addition to other required information. Registered HCBMs must pay licensing and renewal fees. The fees must be set at an amount that ensures the registration, renewal, and oversight activities of the OIC are self-supporting.
Prior to approving an application, the OIC must find that the HCBM has not committed any act that resulted in the denial, suspension, or revocation of a registration, has the capacity to comply with state and federal laws, and has designated a person responsible for such compliance.
A HCBM may not provide services to a health carrier or an employee benefits program without a written agreement describing the rights and responsibilities of the parties. The HCBM must file with the OIC every benefit management contract and contract amendment between the HCBM and a provider, pharmacy, pharmacy services administration organization, or other HCBM.
Pharmacy Benefit Manager Regulation. A PBM is a person that contracts with pharmacies on behalf of an insurer, third party payer, or the prescription drug purchasing consortium to:
A PBM may not:
A PBM must receive affirmative authorization before filling a prescription for a covered person through a nonresident pharmacy. If a covered person uses a nonresident pharmacy, the PBM must allow for dispensing at a local network pharmacy if the mail-order is delayed by more than one day, or if the order arrives in a unusable condition. The PBM must also ensure that covered persons using a nonresident pharmacy have easy and timely access to prescription counseling by a pharmacist.
The committee recommended a different version of the bill than what was heard. PRO: Prohibiting spread pricing has the potential to save millions of dollars. PBMs control all aspects of obtaining drugs including price, who fills the prescription, and what drugs are available to patients. This bill builds on existing regulations and adds additional accountability and transparency. PBMs continue to charge fees to pharmacy because the currently law only applies to state regulated plans. PBM practices are forcing community pharmacies to close. State laws should apply to all PBMs regardless of who they contract with. Patients should have the ability to choose where and when they obtain their prescriptions. Mail order pharmacies do not offer the same services that community pharmacies do.
CON: PBMs are essential to keeping drug prices affordable. Independent pharmacies make more money from higher drug costs. Requiring an opt-in for mail order pharmacy services is confusing for current customers. Plans must be able to manage costs for provider-administered drugs. This bill limits the ability for plans to design affordable networks.
OTHER: Under the bill, pharmacies can refuse to fill a prescription if the reimbursement is too low. This puts consumer in the middle of dispute between the pharmacy and the PBM.
OTHER: PBMs keep finding loopholes in the legislative efforts to approach the use of nonresident pharmacies and continue to have record earnings. Constituents would like to see the current version of this bill return to its original version. The changes made stripped away patient protections and accountability provisions, removed exclusion for specialty drugs, and failed to address the widespread practice of patient steering. Patients rely on their prescriptions for various reasons, including treatment of serious, chronic, and life-threatening illness. Since the pandemic, there has been an increase in mail order delivery for patients. For some, mail order auto delivery is helpful in receiving medications in a timely manner. However, mail order delivery can cost around 40% more than getting prescriptions from a local pharmacy. Additionally, medications that require specific temperature management are delivered in Styrofoam coolers which contribute to pollution. The timing of delivery can be inconvenient for patients and there is no recourse for poor service. There are concerns regarding language and practical applications in this bill. Affirmative authorization before filling a prescription can create a barrier for those who receive maintenance medications if they are required to receive authorization each time a refill is needed. This legislation should avoid double-dispensing medications.