Growth Management Act. The Growth Management Act (GMA) is the comprehensive land use planning framework for counties and cities in Washington. The GMA establishes land-use designation and environmental protection requirements for all Washington counties and cities. The GMA also establishes a significantly wider array of planning duties for 28 counties, and the cities within those counties, that are obligated to satisfy all planning requirements of the GMA. These jurisdictions are sometimes said to be fully planning under the GMA.
Counties that fully plan under the GMA must designate urban growth areas (UGAs), within which urban growth must be encouraged and outside of which growth may occur only if it is not urban in nature. Each city in a county must be included in a UGA. Planning jurisdictions must include within their UGAs sufficient areas and densities to accommodate projected urban growth for the succeeding 20-year period.
The GMA also directs fully planning jurisdictions to adopt internally consistent comprehensive land use plans. Comprehensive plans are implemented through locally adopted development regulations, and both the plans and the local regulations are subject to review and revision requirements prescribed in the GMA. Comprehensive plans must be reviewed, and if necessary, revised every ten years to ensure that it complies with the GMA. When developing their comprehensive plans, counties and cities must consider various goals set forth in statute.
Each comprehensive plan must include a plan, scheme, or design for certain enumerated elements, including a mandatory housing element. The housing element must ensure the vitality and character of established residential neighborhoods and among other requirements consider the role of accessory dwelling units in meeting housing needs.
Accessory Dwelling Units. Any county fully planning under the GMA, city with a population of over 20,000, or county with a population of over 125,000 must have accessory dwelling unit (ADU) provisions incorporated in their development regulations, zoning regulations, or official controls. These provisions must be consistent with a 1993 report from the Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development that provided recommendations to encourage the development and placement of ADUs in areas zoned for single-family residential use. However, local communities have some flexibility to adapt these recommendations to local needs and preferences.
As of July 1, 2021, fully planning cities under the GMA may not require the provision of off-street parking for ADUs within a quarter mile of a major transit stop, such as a high capacity transportation system stop, a rail stop, or certain bus stops, unless the city determines that on-street parking is infeasible for the ADU.
An ADU is a residential living unit providing independent living facilities and permanent provisions for sleeping, cooking, sanitation, and living on the same lot as a single-family home, duplex, triplex, townhome, or other housing unit. A short-term rental is a lodging use, outside of a hotel, motel, or bed and breakfast, in which a room is offered for a fee for fewer than consecutive nights.
Cities and counties fully planning under the GMA must allow for the construction of ADUs within UGAs. When regulating ADUs, such cities and counties may not:
Cities and counties may apply certain regulations to ADUs, including:
Cities and counties may adopt ordinances, development regulations, and other official controls that waive or defer fees, including impact fees, defer the payment of taxes, or waive specific regulations to incentivize the development or construction of ADUs. Such units are subject to effective binding commitments or covenants that the units will not be regularly offered for short-term rental. Fully planning cities and counties must comply with these new ADU requirements by the time of their next comprehensive plan update after July 1, 2021. Such new requirements apply and take effect, and any contrary development regulations are preempted and superseded, after this deadline. A restrictive covenant or deed restriction created after the effective date of the act may not prohibit the construction, development, or use of an ADU within a UGA. A city or county that issues a permit for the construction of an ADU may not be held civilly liable on the basis that the construction would violate the restrictive covenant or deed restriction that was created after the effective date of the act.
The committee recommended a different version of the bill than what was heard. PRO: ADUs are a piece of the puzzle to build more affordable housing and fit into existing neighborhoods very well. These can be part of that gentle density, and if this gets rolled into a larger missing middle bill that is fine. This policy will allow for a couple more options and was worked on last year. This is a good bill.
OTHER: There are concerns with the prescriptive nature of the bill. The requirement for two units on every lot is the primary challenge. This would remove the discretion of cities to make this determination. Local elected officials have authority to make land use decisions in their communities. They do so after robust public participation. They are the elected officials closest to their communities and those decisions should stay local. Section five of the bill is confusing. This bill should be very explicit that these are allowed in the urban growth boundary and only in the urban growth boundary.