Nonpublic Agencies. If a student's special education needs cannot be met by their resident school district, the district may contract with an approved nonpublic agency (NPA) to provide a program of special education and related services. Provisions directing approval processes and oversight responsibilities reside in state rule.
Nonpublic Agency Approval Process. NPAs must be approved by the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) and must re-apply for approval every three years. The contracting school district must conduct an on-site visit of the nonpublic agency and submit those results in the application for approval. OSPI may conduct an independent on-site visit, if appropriate, before determining whether an application will be approved.
School District Oversight Responsibilities. Each school district that contracts with an NPA remains responsible for ensuring their enrolled student is provided a free appropriate public education and that the NPA is able to provide the services required to meet the unique needs of the student. A school district that places a student with an NPA must develop a written contract that includes, among other elements:
The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction Oversight Responsibilities. OSPI is responsible for approving and renewing NPA contracts. OSPI must monitor compliance through written reports, on-site visits, and parent questionnaires. OSPI may suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew its approval of an NPA if the NPA fails to maintain the approval standards, violates the rights of students eligible for special education services, or refuses to implement any corrective actions ordered by OSPI. OSPI must make information regarding currently approved NPAs available on its website.
Restraint and Isolation. Restraint or isolation of any student is permitted only when reasonably necessary to control spontaneous behavior that poses an imminent likelihood of serious harm. Restraint or isolation must be closely monitored to prevent harm to the student, and must be discontinued as soon as the likelihood of serious harm has dissipated. A student's individualized education program (IEP) may not include the use of restraint or isolation as a planned behavior intervention unless the student's individual needs require it and the student's parent or guardian agrees. Each student's IEP must include procedures for notification of a parent or guardian regarding the use of restraint and isolation.
Following the release of a student from the use of restraint or isolation, a school must implement the following procedures:
By January 1st of each year, each school district must summarize all written reports pertaining to restraint and isolation incidents and submit the summary to OSPI. The district must include the following information for each school: the number of individual incidents of restraint and isolation, the number of students involved in the incidents, the number of injuries to students and staff, and the types of restraints used. OSPI must publish this data on its website within 90 days, and may use the data to investigate the training, practices, and other efforts used by schools and districts to reduce the use of restraint and isolation.
Nonpublic Agencies. The term "nonpublic agency" means a private in-state or any out-of-state agency that contracts with a school district to provide a program of special education. A "nonpublic agency school" is a subcategory of nonpublic agency, and means a Washington State private school approved by the State Board of Education (SBE) that contracts with a school district to provide a program of special education for students with disabilities.
OSPI is given the duty and authority to establish standards for approving, monitoring, and investigating NPAs that contract with school districts to provide special education programs for students with disabilities. All standards must ensure that any student served by an NPA has the same rights and protections that they would have if served by a school district.
Nonpublic Agency Approval. OSPI must create an application process to approve nonpublic agencies that contract with school districts to provide special education services to students with disabilities. NPA schools may be approved for a period of up to five years, and all other NPAs may be approved for a period of up to three years.
To qualify for approval an NPA must, at a minimum, meet the following requirements:
Before approving an NPA, OSPI must conduct an onsite visit to ensure that the NPA's facilities, staffing levels, and procedural safeguards are sufficient to provide a safe and appropriate learning environment.
OSPI may suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew its approval of an NPA if the NPA fails to maintain approval standards, fails to comply with all school district contract elements, violates the rights of students, or refuses to implement any corrective actions order by OSPI. OSPI must notify the SBE of if any NPA school is investigated for noncompliance, is directs to complete corrective action, or fails to maintain approval.
The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction Complaint Process. OSPI must develop and publish on its website a complaint process for individuals to report noncompliance or violations of student rights at NPAs. OSPI must use the complaint process to identify and address patterns of misconduct at nonpublic agencies, including issuing corrective action or revoking NPA approval.
School District Contract. A school district that chooses to contract with an NPA must develop a written contract to establish the responsibilities of the school district and NPA and set forth the rights of the students receiving special education services. The contract must include, at a minimum, the following elements:
School District Responsibilities. A school district remains responsible for ensuring that the student being served is provided with a free appropriate public education, provided with special education and related services at no cost to the student's parents and in conformance with an individualized education program, provided with an opportunity to participate in state and district assessments, provided at least the minimum state requirements for hours and days of instruction, and provided with an opportunity to fulfill the requirements to receive a state diploma.
A school district must conduct an annual onsite visit to ensure that an NPAs facilities, staffing levels, and procedural safeguards are sufficient to provide a safe and appropriate learning environment and meet the unique needs of the student being served.
A school district must provide, to the parents or guardians of the student being served, a summary of the district and NPA responsibilities and processes for reporting incidents of isolation and restraint and a copy of the complaint procedure developed by OSPI.
Reports. Beginning December 1, 2023, OSPI must annually submit a report to the education committees of the Legislature regarding student placements at NPAs. The data published in the report must be disaggregated by NPA when it is possible to do so without disclosing a student's personally identifiable information. A summary of the report, including a link to the full report content, must be posted on the OSPI website. The report must include:
Restraint and Isolation. If a student is served by an NPA, the student's IEP must specify any additional procedures required to ensure the NPA fully complies with restraint and isolation procedures.
The term "school" is defined within the isolation and restraint statute to mean a public school or a nonpublic agency that contracts with a school district.
OSPI may use the summarized restraint and isolation data submitted by school districts to determine if an NPA is in compliance with all contract obligations and approval standards.
Safety and Security Training. Safety and security training provided by educational service districts may be provided to NPAs located in Washington that contract with school districts to provide a program of special education to students with disabilities.
The committee recommended a different version of the bill than what was heard. PRO: The Seattle Times recently published an article that spoke to what is happening to students with disabilities in places we expect them to be cared for. The investigations showed that Washington State failed to regulate these facilities. These schools receive millions of dollars every year without much oversight, and there have been complaints of abuse and lack of academic progress. Further reports indicate students are regressing, that staff are relying heavily on restraint and isolation, and that parents aren't receiving information they would receive from public schools. Every student has the right to educational services that are safe, supportive, and maximize access to general education settings. Expanding OSPI oversight for non-public agencies will better protect and serve students eligible for special education. Collaboration with OSPI provides a clearer picture for families on what is accessible to them and their students.
CON: There is a difference between NPAs that are approved as private schools by the State Board of Education and NPAs that are not. NPAs that are also approved by the SBE go through the rigorous approval and accreditation process and are already being closely monitored, reporting to the school board and OSPI annually. Public schools are not equipped to provide the resources that students with special needs require. NPAs providing special needs educational services are equipped with highly specialized staff that would not benefit from district training. This bill requires stringent barriers that may limit the ability of NPAs to provide faith-based or other traditional support mechanisms. Adding new layers to a system that is already working will slow down its ability to serve students and take the small personal team out of the equation.
OTHER: The changes proposed are complex and demand more attention. It is appalling what happened at NW Soil and it is unacceptable that nobody with authority submitted a complaint.
The committee recommended a different version of the bill than what was heard. PRO: A single system should remain the same across all NPAs as stated in the bill to ensure equitable special education. There are concerns in the amended language about conducting on-site visits within 30 days of a student’s placement. The language needs some adjustments between organizations so that they can continue their partnership.