Fire Protection Sprinkler Systems and Contractors. A fire protection sprinkler system contractor is a person or organization that offers to undertake the execution of contracts for the installation, inspection, maintenance, or servicing of a fire protection sprinkler system or any part of such a system.
A fire protection sprinkler system is an assembly of underground and overhead piping or conduit, or both, beginning at the connection to the primary water supply, whether public or private, that conveys water with or without other agents to dispersal openings or devices to extinguish, control, or contain fire, and to provide protection from exposure to fire or other products of combustion.
Licensing Fees. The State Director of Fire Protection (director) administers examinations, issues certificates of competency, and licenses fire protection sprinkler system contractors in accordance with statute. The licensing fees for contractors who install, inspect, maintain, or service certain fire protection sprinkler systems may not exceed:
Fines. The director has authority to adopt rules defining infractions under the fire sprinkler system contractors statute and associated fines for such infractions. A contractor who commits an infraction is subject to a fine no less than $200, and no more than $5,000. A contractor who fails to obtain a certificate of competency is subject to a fine no less than $1,000, and no more than $5,000.
Fire Protection Sprinkler Fitting. The director also administers the fire protection sprinkler fitting statute, including adopting and administering examinations for applicants for certificates of competency, and possessing discretion to investigate alleged violations of the fire protection sprinkler fitting statute.
Licensing Fees. The licensing fees for fire protection sprinkler system contractors who install, inspect, maintain, or service certain fire protection sprinkler systems may not exceed:
The licensing fees may not be increased until 2028.
Enforcement and Fines. The minimum and maximum fines for a contractor who commits an infraction are:
A fire protection sprinkler system contractor who fails to obtain a certificate of competency shall be assessed a fine as follows:
An authorized representative of the director must investigate violations of the fire sprinkler fitter licensing statute. Permissive language under the current statute is removed.
Fire Protection Compliance Account. The Fire Protection Compliance Account is established in the custody of the state treasury. Fines collected for contractor infractions and failure to obtain certificates of competency are to be deposited into this account. Expenditures from the account may only be used for enforcing the fire protection statutes, and the account is subject to allotment procedures, but no appropriation is required for expenditures.
Fire Sprinkler Fitter Trainees. A person with a trainee certificate may perform sprinkler fitting work under supervision. Supervision must consist of the trainee being on the same jobsite and under the control of either a residential or journey-level fire protection sprinkler fitter certified to perform the type of work the trainee is performing. The required ratio of trainees performing journey-level fire sprinkler fitter work to certified sprinkler fitters is 1:1. The required ratio of trainees performing residential fire sprinkler fitter work to certified sprinkler fitters is 2:1.
Changes the required supervision ratio of trainees performing residential fire sprinkler fitter work from 1:1 to 2:1.
The committee recommended a different version of the bill than what was heard. PRO: Increasing fees can increase personnel for enforcement and the supervision requirements will ensure personnel as well-trained. The ratios will give trainees more time to work with a journeyman, which is critical for education. Trainees are left alone on jobsites. Proper installation is critical for public safety. The bill addresses illegal fire sprinkler contractors with escalating penalties and will encourage licensure. The bill will give parity with other trades. Small penalties are not a disincentive. The bill will stop repeat offenders.
CON: The doubling and tripling of fines is excessive when each day of a violation is a separate infraction. This could bankrupt a small company. The new account lacks restrictions on spending that the licensing account has. Removing penalties from the current account will exacerbate the current shortfall. Requiring investigations will create nuisance complaints from competitors.