Discrimination in Compensation Based on Gender Prohibited. Under the Washington Equal Pay and Opportunities Act, any employer who discriminates in providing compensation based on gender between similarly employed employees of the employer is guilty of a misdemeanor. If any employee receives less compensation because of discrimination on account of gender in violation of this law, that employee is entitled to certain remedies. Employees are similarly employed if the individuals work for the same employer, the performance of the job requires similar skill, effort, and responsibility, and the jobs are performed under similar working conditions. Job titles alone are not determinative of whether employees are similarly employed.
Discrimination does not include a differential in compensation based in good faith on a bona fide job-related factor or factors that:
More than one factor may account for the differential. Bona fide factors include:
A differential in compensation based in good faith on a local government ordinance providing for a minimum wage different from state law does not constitute discrimination under this section. The employer carries the burden of proof on these defenses.
Discrimination in Career Advancement Opportunities Based on Gender Prohibited. An employer may not, on the basis of gender, limit or deprive an employee of career advancement opportunities that would otherwise be available. A differential in career advancement based on a bona fide job-related factor or factors that meet the above criteria does not constitute discrimination within the meaning of this section. Such bona fide factors described above apply. If it is determined an employer committed a pattern of violations as to an employee or committed a violation through application of a formal or informal employer policy or practice, the employee is entitled to certain remedies.
Retaliation Prohibited. An employer may not retaliate against an employee because the employee has filed any complaint, or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding, or has testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding, or because of the exercise by such employee on behalf of the employee or others of any right afforded by the law.
Investigations and Remedies. Upon complaint by an employee, the director must investigate to determine if there has been compliance with the law. The Department of Labor & Industries (L&I), upon complaint, may also initiate an investigation on behalf of one or more employees for a violation. If L&I determines a violation occurred, L&I must attempt to resolve the violation by conference and conciliation. If no agreement is reached and the director determines: (1) a wage discrimination occurred, or (2) the employer committed a pattern of violations of career advancement opportunity discrimination as to an employee or committed a violation through application of a formal or informal employer policy or practice, L&I may issue a citation and notice of assessment and order:
In addition to the citation and notice of assessment, L&I may order payment to L&I:
Private Right of Action. An employee may bring a civil action against an employer for violations for actual damages; statutory damages equal to the actual damages or $5,000, whichever is greater, and interest of 1 percent per month on all compensation owed; and costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. The court may also order reinstatement and injunctive relief.
The employee must bring a civil action within three years of the date of the alleged violation regardless of whether the employee pursued an administrative complaint. Filing a civil action terminates L&I's processing of the complaint. Recovery of any wages and interest owed must be calculated from four years from the last violation prior to the date of filing the civil action.
An employee alleging a violation related to career opportunities is entitled to relief only if the court determines the employer committed a pattern of violations as to the employee or committed a violation through application of a formal or informal employer policy or practice.
Prohibitions on discrimination in wages and career advancement opportunities are extended to a person's membership in a protected class.
Protected class means a person's age, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, race, creed, color, national origin, citizenship or immigration status, honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability or the use of a trained guide dog or service animal by a person with a disability as currently defined in state law.
Makes the act effective on July 1, 2025.
The committee recommended a different version of the bill than what was heard. PRO: Washington's current Equal Pay Act does not help protect other than gender and leaves out many workers. Every worker deserves to be paid equally and fairly without discrimination. Equal pay day comes later for women, persons of color, and others. There are staggering inequalities. The pay gap has widen over time.
This bill helps address pay gaps other than a person's performance. The bill helps build a stronger inclusive community. Identities are multifacitive and this is how people show up in the workplace. The bill takes a comprehensive approach to pay discrimination. There must be a remedy. WLAD is not sufficient to protect people. The Equal Pay Act has worked well and should be applied to all protected classes.
OTHER: We request a little more time to July 1, 2025 to implement the bill. It has been amended over the past years and have done a lot of outreach to the business community on the laws. We have concerns about broadness in definition. For the term sensory, there are five senses and this could be interpreted more broadly. For perceived disabilities, there is no requirement of communication between employer or employee. Using "or" is a lot simpler and more clear. Education and rulemaking is needed for clarity and fairness.