FINAL BILL REPORT
SSB 6015
C 274 L 24
Synopsis as Enacted
Brief Description: Concerning residential parking configurations.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Local Government, Land Use & Tribal Affairs (originally sponsored by Senators Shewmake, Kuderer and Liias).
Senate Committee on Local Government, Land Use & Tribal Affairs
House Committee on Local Government
Background:

Growth Management Act. The Growth Management Act (GMA) is the comprehensive land use planning framework for counties and cities in Washington. The GMA establishes land-use designation and environmental protection requirements for all Washington counties and cities. The GMA also establishes a significantly wider array of planning duties for 28 counties, and the cities within those counties, obligated to satisfy all planning requirements of the GMA. These jurisdictions are sometimes said to be fully planning under the GMA.?


The GMA also directs fully planning jurisdictions to adopt internally consistent comprehensive land use plans. Comprehensive plans are implemented through locally adopted development regulations, and both the plans and the local regulations are subject to review and revision requirements prescribed in the GMA. A comprehensive plan must be reviewed and, if necessary, revised every ten years to ensure that it complies with the GMA. When developing their comprehensive plans, counties and cities must consider various goals set forth in statute.?


Minimum Residential Parking Requirements. Minimum residential parking requirements mandated by municipal zoning ordinances of cities and counties planning under the GMA are subject to the following requirements:?

  • for affordable housing units that are affordable to very low-income or extremely low-income individuals and located within one-quarter mile of a transit stop receiving transit service at least two times per hour for 12 or more hours a day, minimum residential parking requirements may be no greater than one parking space per bedroom or a three-quarter space per unit;
  • for housing units specifically for seniors or people with disabilities and located within one-quarter mile of a transit stop receiving transit service at least four times per hour for 12 or more hours a day, a city may not impose minimum residential parking requirements for the residents of such housing units;
    1. a city may require a developer to record a covenant that prohibits the rental of a unit subject to this parking restriction for any purpose other than providing housing for seniors or people with disabilities; and
  • for market rate multifamily housing units located within one-quarter mile of a transit stop that receives transit service from at least one route that provides service at least four times per hour for 12 or more hours per day, minimum residential parking requirements may be no greater than one parking space per bedroom or a three-quarter space per unit.?

?

A city may establish a requirement for the provision of additional parking space per bedroom or per unit if the jurisdiction has determined a particular housing unit to be in an area with a lack of access to street parking capacity, physical space impediments, or other reasons supported by evidence that would make on-street parking infeasible for the unit.?

?

Minimum Parking Standards for Middle Housing Types. Cities that are required or choose to plan under the GMA may not:

  • require off-street parking as a condition of permitting development of middle housing within one-half?mile walking distance of a major transit stop;
  • require more than one off-street parking space per unit as a condition of permitting development of middle housing on lots smaller than 6000 square feet; and
  • require more than two off-street parking spaces per unit as a condition of permitting development of middle housing on lots greater than 6000 square feet.

?

These minimum parking standards do not apply:

  • if a local government submits to the Department of Commerce an empirical study that clearly demonstrates the application of the parking limitations will be significantly less safe for vehicle drivers or passengers, pedestrians, or bicycles; or
  • to portions of cities within a one-mile radius of a commercial airport in Washington with at least 9 million?enplanements.

?

Cities and counties that are?required or choose to plan under the GMA are subject to the same off-street parking standards when permitting the development of ?accessory dwelling units (ADUs). A city may not require the provision of off-street parking for ADUs within one-quarter mile of a major transit stop unless the city has determined the ADU is in an area with a lack of access to street parking capacity, physical space impediments, or other reasons supported by evidence that would make on-street parking infeasible for the ADU.

Summary:

Cities and counties must enforce the following land use regulations for residential development:?

  • garages and carports may not be required as a way to meet minimum parking requirements for residential development;
  • parking spaces that count towards minimum parking requirements may be enclosed or unenclosed;
  • parking spaces in tandem count towards meeting minimum parking requirements at a rate of one space for every 20 linear feet, with any necessary provisions for turning radius;
  • the existence of non-conforming gravel surfacing in existing designated parking areas may not be a reason for prohibiting the use of existing space in the parking area to meet local parking standards;
  • parking spaces may not be required to exceed 8 feet by 20 feet, except for required parking for people with disabilities; and
  • parking spaces that consist of grass block pavers may count towards minimum parking regulations.

?

Existing parking spaces that do not conform to these requirements are not required to be modified or resized, except for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Existing paved parking lots are not required to change the size of existing parking paces during resurfacing if doing so will be more costly or require significant reconfiguration of the parking space locations.

?

Any county planning under the GMA, and any city within the county with a population greater than 6,000, may not require off-street parking as a condition of permitting a residential project if compliance with tree retention would otherwise make a proposed residential development or redevelopment infeasible.

?

Portions of cities within a one-mile radius of a commercial airport with at least 9 million annual enplanments are exempt from the requirements of this act.

Votes on Final Passage:
Final Passage Votes
Senate 30 19
House 95 1 (House amended)
Senate 28 21 (Senate concurred)
Effective:

June 6, 2024