Growth Management Act. The Growth Management Act (GMA) is the comprehensive land use planning framework for counties and cities in Washington. The GMA establishes land use designation and environmental protection requirements for all Washington counties and cities. The GMA also establishes a significantly wider array of planning duties for 28 counties, and the cities within those counties, that are obligated to satisfy all planning requirements of the GMA. These jurisdictions are sometimes said to be fully planning under the GMA.
The GMA directs fully planning jurisdictions to adopt internally consistent comprehensive land use plans. Comprehensive plans are implemented through locally adopted development regulations, and must include a plan, scheme, or design for certain enumerated elements, including mandatory land use and rural elements. The rural element must provide for a variety of rural densities, uses, essential public facilities, and rural governmental services needed to serve the permitted densities and uses.
Counties that fully plan under the GMA must designate urban growth areas (UGAs), within which urban growth must be encouraged and outside of which growth may occur only if it is not urban in nature.
Major Industrial Development. Counties may establish a process for approval of a major industrial development outside of the UGA for a specific business. A major industrial development is defined as a master planned location for a specific manufacturing, industrial, or commercial business that:
A major industrial development may be approved outside the UGA if certain criteria are met, including but not limited to:
Final approval of an application for major industrial development is considered an adopted amendment to the comprehensive plan and may be considered any time. Upon application approval the development is designated as a UGA.
Industrial Land Banks. In addition to major industrial developments, the GMA allows certain counties to designate industrial land banks outside of UGAs. Counties that meet this criteria may establish, in consultation with its cities, a process for designating a land bank of no more than two master planned locations for major industrial activity outside urban growth areas.
A master planned location for major industrial developments may be approved through a two-step process where:
In selecting locations for the industrial land bank priority must be given to locations that are in close proximity to a UGA. Final approval of an application for an industrial land bank is considered an adopted amendment to the comprehensive plan and may be considered any time.
Counties must adopt development regulations for the approval of specific major industrial developments through a master plan process. Regulations must include, but are not limited to:
County authority to designate land banks expired December 31, 2016.
A rural county planning under the GMA that meets certain population criteria may establish, in consultation with its cities, a process for designating a land bank of no more than two master planned locations of natural resource-based industrial activity outside UGAs.
Natural resource-based industrial developments may be approved by:
If a county adopts development regulations for review and approval of specific natural resource-based industrial developments through a local master plan process, the regulations must ensure, at minimum:
Natural resource-based industrial development means a location suitable for natural resource or agricultural related industrial business that:
For purposes of this bill, a rural county is defined as a county with a population density of less than 100 persons per square mile or a county smaller than 225 square miles as determined by the Office of Financial Management.
PRO: Mattawa is a rural, disadvantaged community that does not have the resources to extend the UGA to allow for industrial development. Some food processing companies have looked at developing in Mattawa and can get a conditional use permit but can't get financing to build. This bill would provide a solution for rural ports such as Mattawa and would attract economic development, as well as more jobs.
CON: There may be an opportunity to work at the local level to address the conditional use permit and financing issues if the land is already zoned as an allowable use. Stakeholders are working with the ports to solve the issue within the parameters of the current statute.
OTHER: There needs to be a clear path forward for natural resource-based industrial development in rural areas, but some of the specific and technical issues on the bill are concerning.