Cannabis Retail Sales. Cannabis retailers may sell certain quantities of cannabis products to adults age 21 and over and to qualifying patients who are at least age 18 if they are entered in the Medical Cannabis Authorization Database (Database) and hold a valid recognition card. Cannabis retailers may sell to a purchaser any combination of the following types and amounts of cannabis products: (1) one ounce of useable cannabis; (2) 16 ounces of cannabis-infused product in solid form; (3) 72 ounces of cannabis-infused product in liquid form; and (4) seven grams of cannabis concentrate. Qualifying patients and designated providers in the Database with a valid recognition card may purchase three times those limits from a cannabis retailer.
The cannabis product types are defined as follows:
University of Washington Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute Report to the Legislature. The University of Washington Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute (ADAI) is a multidisciplinary research institute in the University of Washington School of Medicine's Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences. Pursuant to the 2021-23 Operating Budget, the Health Care Authority contracted with the ADAI to develop policy solutions in response to public health challenges of high-THC potency cannabis. A final report was submitted to the Legislature in 2022 making recommendations for policy changes to reduce negative impacts of high-THC cannabis.
Tribal-State Cannabis Agreements. The Governor may enter into agreements with federally recognized Indian tribes, which may address any cannabis-related issue that involves both state and tribal interests or has an impact on tribal-state relations. There are 29 federally recognized Indian tribes in Washington and most of these tribes have a cannabis agreement with the state addressing production, processing, and retail sales of cannabis by the tribe.
Legislative Intent. Legislative intent is provided regarding high-THC cannabis policy and funding intended to be provided to the Department of Health (DOH) to allow DOH to issue requests for proposals and contract for targeted public health messages and social marketing campaigns directed toward individuals most likely to suffer negative impacts of high THC products including persons under 25 years of age, persons reporting poor mental health, and persons living with mental health challenges.
Development of Department of Health Optional Training for Cannabis Retail Staff. By July 1, 2025, DOH must develop an optional training that cannabis retail staff may complete to better understand the health and safety impacts of high-THC cannabis products. In developing the training, DOH must consult with cannabis retail staff, cannabis consumers, persons who have been harmed by high-THC products, health care providers, prevention professionals, researchers with relevant expertise, and behavioral health providers.
Additional Age Restriction for Sales of Certain Cannabis Products. LCB must define high THC by July 1, 2026. Licensed cannabis retail outlets may not sell a cannabis product with a high THC concentration to a person who is under age 25 who is not a qualifying patient or designated provider. Penalties for violations are: (1) a five-day suspension or $500 penalty for a first violation; (2) a seven-day suspension for a second violation during a two-year period; (3) a 30-day suspension for a third violation in a two-year period; and (4) cancellation of license for a fourth violation in a two-year period.
University of Washington Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute Duties and Reports. Subject to amounts appropriated, the ADAI must develop, implement, test, and evaluate guidance and health interventions for health care providers and patients at risk for developing serious complications due to cannabis consumption who are seeking care in certain health care facilities, and for use by state poison control and recovery hotlines to promote cannabis use reduction and cessation for:
The ADAI must submit preliminary and progress reports to the Legislature and a final report, by December 1, 2028, summarizing the results of the interventions and any recommendations for implementation of health interventions.
Tribal-State Cannabis Agreements. The Governor may seek government-to-government consultations with federally recognized Indian tribes regarding raising the minimum legal age of sale of cannabis products with highTHC concentration, in tribal-state cannabis agreements. The Office of the Governor must report to the Legislature regarding the status of consultations by December 1, 2025.
The committee recommended a different version of the bill than what was heard. PRO: This is a second crack at the concern about youth using high potency cannabis and having mental health or schizophrenia psychosis triggers. Cannabis products used to have a much lower THC concentration. Now you can buy 100 percent THC products. There have been previous bills trying to lower the THC products to about 10 percent. There was stakeholdering of these issues with this somewhat agreed to bill with best practices. This bill would ban sales of products with 35 percent or more to person under 25. It does not make a statement that all cannabis is bad for people.
This bill is but just trying to protect children. Parts of brains skills for planning and decision making continue to develop into our late 20's. We support reducing access to these products for young adults. Studies show that the frequent use of these products in undeveloped brains (under age 25) may trigger outcomes like addiction, cannabis hyperemesis syndrome, anxiety, depression, and long-term and mental health issues. While researching these issues with 3,700 cannabis consumers, we learned that 32 percent of reported anxiety, psychosis, vomiting, hallucinations, flashbacks, 20 percent felt so bad they went to the ER. High THC products are harmful and should not be consumed by people under 25. We need health programs, targeted education, and clinical guidelines to help prevent psychosis.
Over a decade has passed since legalization of cannabis. Since that time, the industry has developed high potency cannabis. We don?t even know what are in these products, sometimes they have heavy metals from being cooked down. This can be very dangerous. The bill is a commonsense approach.
CON: We are opposed to the ban on sales to persons under 25. Prohibition pushes people to the illegal market. Cannabis is being treated differently than other areas. Alcohol, tobacco and gambling can cause more harm for young adults. The focus needs to be on stopping youth use before the age of 21. Substance abuse prior to 21 has a higher risk. We should not single out cannabis products.
We support the other sections on youth prevention. We have to teach the children about the dangers. We would like to see more education and public outreach for youth or adults and these should be funded. We need funding for medical research on the impacts of cannabis
The bill relies on testing that is inadequate. California just put out a study that testing methods for cannabis was off by ten points. Hash consumption has been around for a long time. The methods have changed. The bill is under developed and is a messaging bill.
PRO: Senator Jesse Salomon, Prime Sponsor; Denise Walker; Beatriz Carlini, University of Washington; Mary Lou Dickerson; Megan Moore, Washington State Public Health Association; LINDA THOMPSON, Washington Association for Substance misuse and Violence Prevention (WASAVP); Beth Ebel, Washington Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
PRO: The public education piece of this bill is a necessary component for whichever policy the Legislature implements. The public understanding of TCH is very low. This bill reduces the negative fiscal impacts of high THC products statewide by reducing negative public health outcomes, especially for those under 25 years old. This bill will save money in our healthcare, criminal justice, and other state systems. Our journey with legalization has come at the expense of health outcomes for kids. Regulation works. We need to know what is in these products and reduce them getting to kids. We need to limit exposure to high THC products for those with developing brains under 25 years old. Thirty-two percent of cannabis users are harmed by their cannabis use, reporting panic attacks, fainting, psychosis, and other ailments. Health care services to treat these conditions currently cost a lot of taxpayer money. Reduced tax revenue from selling these products will be offset by better health outcomes for kids.
CON: We are opposed to the piece of this bill that prohibits the sale of high THC products. History has shown that prohibition doesn't work. However, we do support extensive public education, and we encourage you to move forward with even more education. We recommend you look at the bill that allows higher taxes on high THC products instead. It is estimated that 25 percent of sales currently happen in the illicit market. If we ban products in the regulated market, the illicit market can step in. We enthusiastically support the House version of this bill that helps teenagers avoid experimenting with cannabis. We need to provide more money to prevention programs. According to a Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee (JLARC) study, prevention, education, and treatment received only a small amount of funding from the dedicated cannabis account. We believe there are better options being considered this session to address these concerns.