Authorized Uses and Requirements for Automated Traffic Safety Cameras.
The use of automated traffic safety cameras (traffic safety cameras) is permitted:
The local legislative authority with jurisdiction where the traffic safety cameras are to be located must prepare an analysis of the locations within the jurisdiction where traffic safety cameras are proposed to be located before enacting an ordinance authorizing their use, and before adding additional traffic safety cameras or relocating any existing traffic safety camera. The analysis required of a city and county prior to the installation of traffic safety cameras must include an assessment of equity considerations, including the impact on livability, accessibility, economics, education, and environmental health. The analysis must also consider the results of the equity assessment when identifying where to locate traffic safety cameras. The analysis must show a demonstrated need for traffic safety cameras based on rates of collision reports showing near collisions, travel by vulnerable roadway users, evidence of vehicles speeding, and on anticipated or actual ineffectiveness or infeasibility of other mitigation measures.
An ordinance is required to be enacted in cities and counties with traffic safety cameras installed on or after July 24, 2005. The ordinance must incorporate the restrictions required by state law and provisions for public notice and signage.
The location where the traffic safety camera has been installed must be clearly marked at least 30 days prior to activation of the traffic safety camera through the placement of signs at that location that follows federal guidelines as adopted by the Washington State Department of Transportation. Cities and counties must post traffic safety camera restrictions and requirements, including requirements for public notice and signage, on their websites. Signs required at all locations where traffic safety cameras are used must clearly indicate either that the driver is within an area where traffic safety cameras are authorized or that the driver is entering an area where violations are enforced by a traffic safety camera. The signs must be readily visible to a driver approaching a traffic safety camera. Public transportation vehicles utilizing a vehicle-mounted system must post a sign on the rear of the vehicle indicating that the vehicle is equipped with a traffic safety camera to enforce bus stop zone violations.
Traffic cameras are also authorized for use on school buses for the enforcement of failure to stop for a school bus violation, as well as in state highway work zones for speeding violations.
Required Reporting.
Cities and counties using traffic safety cameras must post an annual report on their websites that includes the number of traffic collisions that occurred at each location with a traffic safety camera, the number of notices of traffic infractions issued for each traffic safety camera, and other relevant information. By January 1, 2026, the annual report required to be posted on a city's or county's website with information on the number of traffic collisions and notices of infraction issued at traffic safety camera locations must also include:
The Washington Traffic Safety Commission (Traffic Safety Commission) is required to provide an annual report to the Transportation Committees of the Legislature and to post the report to its website for public access, beginning July 1, 2026, that includes:
To the extent practicable, the Traffic Safety Commission must also provide in its annual report the number of traffic accidents, speeding violations, single vehicle accidents, pedestrian accidents, and driving under the influence violations that occurred at each location where a traffic safety camera is located in the five years prior to a traffic safety camera's authorization and following a traffic safety camera's authorization.
Restrictions on Use of Automated Traffic Safety Cameras.
Traffic safety cameras may only take pictures of the vehicle and vehicle license plate while an infraction is occurring, and the pictures taken must not reveal the face of the driver or passengers in the vehicle. Photos, electronic images, and other personally identifying information captured by a traffic safety camera may only be used for the enforcement of traffic infractions for which their use has been authorized, and may not be retained longer than would be necessary for these enforcement purposes. Photos, electronic images, and personally identifying information are not available to the public, and may not be used in a court in a pending action or proceeding unless that action or proceeding relates to a traffic infraction for which their use has been authorized.
Automated Traffic Safety Camera-Captured Infractions.
A notice of traffic infraction must be mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle within 14 days of the violation (or to its renter within 14 days of his or her name and address being established). A notice of traffic infraction may be issued by a law enforcement officer or a civilian employee who works for a law enforcement agency or a local public works or transportation department, and who is sufficiently trained and certified by peace officers or traffic engineers. The person issuing the notice must include a certificate or copy of a certificate stating the facts supporting the notice, which serves as prima facie evidence of the facts contained in it. The photographs or electronic images that serve as evidence of the violation must be available for inspection and admission into evidence in a proceeding on the infraction.
The registered owner of a vehicle is held responsible for the infraction unless he or she states under oath in a written statement to the court or in testimony before the court that the vehicle was stolen or was in the care, custody, or control of some other person at the time of the infraction. The traffic safety camera infraction is not part of the registered owner's driving record and must be processed in the same manner as parking infractions. The infraction may not exceed $145, adjusted for inflation every five years. The maximum penalty amount may be doubled for a traffic safety camera-enforced school speed zone infraction.
Registered owners of vehicles who receive notices of infraction for traffic safety camera-enforced infractions and who are recipients of state public assistance other than Medicaid, and who request reduced penalties, must be granted reduced penalties of 50 percent of what would otherwise be assessed for first traffic safety camera violations and subsequent traffic violations issued within 21 days of the first violation's issuance. Recipients of notices of infraction must be provided with information on their eligibility and the opportunity to apply for a reduction in penalties. A city or county may also adopt the use of an online ability-to-pay calculator to process and grant requests for reduced fines or civil penalties for traffic safety camera violations.
Automated Traffic Safety Camera Revenue Use.
Revenues generated by traffic safety cameras may only be used by a city or county that collects them for traffic safety activities related to construction and preservation projects and maintenance and operations, and for the costs to administer, install, operate, and maintain traffic cameras, including costs associated with the processing of infractions.
For cities and counties with a population of 10,000 or greater, the revenue used for traffic safety activities must include the use of revenue that, at a minimum, is proportionate to the share of the population who are residents of census tracts with household incomes in the lowest quartile and in areas that experience above average rates of injury crashes in the city or county. Cities and counties with a population of less than 10,000 are required to make revenue use determinations that are informed by the Department of Health's Environmental Health Disparities Map.
Beginning four years after a traffic safety camera is initially placed into use, 25 percent of the revenue generated from traffic safety cameras placed into use (excluding revenue for costs associated with administering, installing, operating, and maintaining traffic cameras), must be deposited in the Cooper Jones Active Transportation Safety Account, except for revenue generated from red light and school zone cameras for existing traffic safety camera programs with:
Maximum Permissible Noise Levels.
The Department of Ecology (Ecology) is authorized to adopt maximum permissible noise levels in identified environments, including the adoption of motor vehicle noise performance standards. Maximum permissible noise levels adopted by Ecology must be administered according to testing and inspection procedures adopted by rule by the Washington State Patrol (WSP).
By Ecology rule, no person is permitted to operate a motor vehicle on a public roadway under any condition of grade, load, acceleration, or deceleration in a manner that exceeds maximum permissible sound levels for the specified speed permitted and based on vehicle weight, as measured at a distance of 50 feet from the center of the lane of travel. Permitted sound levels are provided for vehicles 10,000 pounds or less and for those over 10,000 pounds (as measured by gross vehicle weight rating), and for roadways with a speed limit of 45 miles per hour (mph) or less and roadways with a speed limit of greater than 45 mph.
Every motor vehicle is required to be equipped with an exhaust system and muffler in good working order that is used during operation of the vehicle at all times to prevent excessive or unusual noise. No person may operate a motor vehicle on a public roadway if the vehicle exhaust system exceeds the maximum permissible sound level by vehicle category and year of manufacture, as established in rule by Ecology.
The Traffic Safety Commission is required to oversee a pilot program authorized until July 1, 2028, in cities with a population of at least 2,000 people that implements the use of automated vehicle noise enforcement cameras (noise enforcement cameras) in zones designated by ordinance as vehicle-racing camera enforcement zones. Noise enforcement cameras, defined as a type of traffic safety camera that use a combination of camera and microphone technologies, are authorized to be used to detect maximum permissible vehicle equipment sound level violations in zones designated by ordinance as vehicle-racing camera enforcement zones under this pilot program, subject to the restrictions applicable to traffic safety cameras.
Noise enforcement cameras may be used to detect violations of noise standards that exceed the maximum permissible vehicle sound levels established by Ecology in rule, or by an equivalent local ordinance, and are exempt from testing and inspection procedures adopted in rule by the WSP. Noise enforcement cameras may only record audio of the vehicle immediately before, during, and after a violation.
The Traffic Safety Commission must provide a report on the pilot program to the Transportation Committees of the Legislature by January 1, 2028, which includes information on the number of noise enforcement cameras in use by type and location, with an analysis of camera placement in the context of area demographics and household incomes. The report must also include the number of violations that occurred at each location. Cities using noise enforcement cameras are required to provide the Traffic Safety Commission with the data requested for this report.
The substitute bill modifies the authorization for noise enforcement cameras by authorizing their use only as part of a pilot program authorized through June 30, 2028, to be overseen by the Traffic Safety Commission, for which cities with populations over 2,000 are eligible. It requires the Traffic Safety Commission to provide a report on the pilot program to the Transportation Committees of the Legislature by January 1, 2028, that includes information on the number of noise enforcement cameras in use by type and location, with an analysis of camera placement by demographics and household income, and on the number of maximum permissible sound level violations by location. It also requires cities using noise enforcement cameras to provide the Traffic Safety Commission with the requested data needed to complete its report.
The substitute bill removes the authorization for noise enforcement cameras to be used to enforce racing of vehicle violations, and clarifies the statutory authority for maximum permissible vehicle equipment sound level violations. In addition, it exempts noise enforcement cameras from following WSP procedures for the measurement of maximum permissible vehicle sound levels that would apply in the case of a law enforcement officer measuring vehicle sound levels.
(In support) This bill allows jurisdictions to use a different type of camera to identify vehicles that exceed the permissible sound threshold. Vehicles are used in street racing, which has resulted in a number of deaths.
The purpose of these cameras is to address street racing, as well as wildly excessive noise from vehicles, that occurs at all hours. There has been a trend in recent years to make exhaust systems extremely loud, with backfiring as loud as gunshots. Vehicles accelerate repeatedly, resulting in repeated backfires. The noise impact reaches thousands of people.
The bill includes protections for privacy and civil rights. Microphones turn on and record for three seconds and then shut off. The recording is then reviewed by a human being to confirm the sound levels have exceeded what is permitted before a citation is issued.
(Opposed) These cameras may result in inaccurate infraction detection, discriminatory targeting, and the capturing of ambient noise. Poor and minority communities are often targeted for enforcement. This bill does not mandate a limit to how long the cameras can record, and the limitation on storage does not apply to photos and videos. There is no decibel level limitation for what will activate a camera. Washington does not allow for the recording of private conversations. These cameras could record all audio in an area, including private conversations, in violation of state law.
(In support) Representative Brandy Donaghy, prime sponsor; and Ben Zarlingo, Everett City Council.