Anadromous Fish Management.
Several species of salmon, as well as Puget Sound steelhead trout, are listed as either threatened or endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act. The Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) is responsible for managing the state's fish and wildlife resources. Other state agencies are responsible for various other issues that relate to salmon recovery: for example, water quality, land management, and fish passage barrier removal. Those agencies include the Department of Ecology (Ecology), the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT).
The Governor's Salmon Recovery Office.
The Governor's Salmon Recovery Office (SRO) is responsible for coordinating the statewide strategy for salmon recovery to healthy, sustainable population levels. A primary purpose of the SRO is to coordinate and assist in the development, implementation, and revision of regional salmon recovery plans. For administrative purposes, the SRO is located within the Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO).
The Salmon Advisory Commission.
A Salmon Advisory Commission (Commission) is established to:
The members of the Commission are as follows:
The Commission must meet twice per year, choose cochairs from among its legislative membership, and be staffed by legislative staff. The Commission's first report to the Governor and Legislature containing recommendations regarding anadromous fish recovery is due October 1, 2026, and subsequent reports are due by June 1 and December 1 of each year.
(In support) Salmon are not just a species, they are the fundamental essence of Washington's identity and ecosystems. Salmon and steelhead populations continue to decline. The question that persists is "who is in charge of the salmon?" Washington has strong agencies and dedicated agency staff working on salmon recovery, but decisions are often siloed. The state should ensure coordination between the executive branch, the legislative branch, and honoring the comanagement responsibilities and obligations to our Washington tribes and those tribes who have treaty rights within Washington Territory. Climate change and environmental impacts are accelerating on stream flows, water temperatures, habitat resilience, delays and misalignment now, having irreversible consequences. Tribes are bearing the brunt of these failures, as salmon decline, directly undermining treaty-reserved fishing rights upheld by the state and the federal law. This process does not replace the government-to-government relationship between the state and tribes, and it does not replace agency authority. The goal is to identify and address gaps and overlaps to improve salmon recovery. Tribes are not stakeholders, but sovereign governments and comanagers and the state's partners and allies.
(Opposed) None.
(Other) Some of the best salmon recovery efforts have been done by tribes. Tribes have both local knowledge and accountability, and that is what is necessary to keep salmon recovery on track. There is not a need for more bureaucracy. The state has had trouble recovering salmon, and the solution is to put more decisions in the hands of those with local knowledge and experience. The Legislature, unfortunately, has allowed the streamlining of certain permitting processes to lapse.