Public Water Systems. The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) is the federal law that ensures the quality of drinking water supplied by public water systems serving at least 15 connections or 25 individuals. Under the SDWA, state regulatory agencies are generally responsible for implementing drinking water standards and for direct oversight of the operation of public water systems. The Department of Health (DOH) implements Washington's drinking water program as mandated by the SDWA and state laws.
Group A and Group B Water Systems. Under state law, a Group A public water system is a public water system that:
Public water systems that do not meet the definition of a Group A public water system are Group B public water systems. Group A and Group B systems have different requirements for operations, water quality testing, and, in some cases, system design. Local jurisdictions may adopt and implement their own Group B system regulations, so long as they are no less stringent than the rules set forth by DOH.
Planning, Engineering, and Design Criteria. By DOH rule, a purveyor must calculate residential population by using a default assumption of 2.5 persons per dwelling unit when submitting a new or expanding Group B system design for approval. If the system is designed to serve ten to fourteen residential service connections, DOH rule requires a purveyor to use the planning, engineering, and design criteria for Group A systems when submitting a new or expanding Group B system design for approval.
A default number may not be used to calculate the average number of people served by a water system, where use of a default number would cause a water system that would otherwise be classified as a Group B water system to be classified as a Group A water system.
PRO: The rule requiring use of the default 2.5 occupancy assumption has required a small community on the Key Peninsula to expend almost $50,000 to classify as Group A. This community has 12 connections and nine year round residents, but because 2.5 x 12 = 30, the state treated this community as though it had 30 residents when one sought a building permit.
The consequences are more than just financial: this regulatory burden really broke up the community. It would have cost each home around $4,000 to $5,000 and there's people with money and people without. That kind of antagonism is ugly and unnecessary.
PRO: Representative Michelle Caldier, Prime Sponsor; Jack Dunne, South Head Water Association.