SENATE BILL REPORT
ESSB 6110
As Amended by House, March 4, 2026
Title: An act relating to addressing electric-assisted bicycles and electric motorcycles.
Brief Description: Addressing electric-assisted bicycles and electric motorcycles.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Senators Shewmake, Liias, Dhingra and Nobles).
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Transportation: 1/26/26, 1/29/26 [DPS, DNP, w/oRec].
Floor Activity: Passed Senate: 2/11/26, 42-7.
Passed House: 3/4/26, 91-3.
Brief Summary of Engrossed First Substitute Bill
  • Clarifies the definition of an electric-assisted bicycle.
  • Directs the Department of Licensing to convene a work group to study and recommend a statutory framework for electric motorcycles.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 6110 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.
Signed by Senators Liias, Chair; Krishnadasan, Vice Chair; Lovick, Vice Chair; King, Ranking Member; Alvarado, Chapman, Cortes, Harris, Hunt, Lovelett, Nobles, Shewmake and Valdez.
Minority Report: Do not pass.
Signed by Senators Christian, Fortunato and MacEwen.
Minority Report: That it be referred without recommendation.
Signed by Senators Goehner, Assistant Ranking Member; Holy and Wilson, J..
Staff: Brandon Popovac (786-7465)
Background:

An electric-assisted bicycle (e-bike) is defined as a bicycle with two or three wheels, a saddle, fully operative pedals for human propulsion, and an electric motor. The electric motor must have a power output of no more than 750 watts. An e-bike must satisfy one of the following class requirements:

  • class 1 electric-assisted bicycle—defined as having a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling and stops providing assistance when the bicycle reaches a speed of 20 miles per hour (mph);
  • class 2 electric-assisted bicycle—defined as having a motor that may be used exclusively to propel the bicycle and stops providing assistance when the bicycle reaches a speed of 20 mph; or
  • class 3 electric-assisted bicycle—defined as having a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling and that stops providing assistance when the bicycle reaches a speed of 28 mph, and is equipped with a speedometer.

 

By definition, an e-bike is not a motorcycle or motorized foot scooter, and a driver's license or vehicle registration is not required to operate an e-bike.

 

Provisions that apply to a bicycle or bicycle operator typically apply to an e-bike and an e-bike operator, with some exceptions.

 

Class 1 and class 2 e-bikes may be operated on a shared-use path or any part of a highway designated for the use of bicycles, unless restricted or limited or otherwise regulated by local jurisdictions or state agencies.

 

Persons under 16 years of age may not operate a class 3 e-bike. Class 3 e-bikes may not be operated on a sidewalk unless there is no alternative to travel over a sidewalk that is part of a bicycle or pedestrian path or if authorized by the local jurisdiction. Class 3 e-bikes may be operated on facilities that are within or adjacent to a highway, but may not be operated on a shared-use path unless authorized by the local jurisdiction. State agencies or local jurisdictions may regulate the use of class 3 e-bikes on facilities and properties under their jurisdiction and control.

 

A manufacturer or distributor of new e-bikes offered for sale or distribution in the state must:

  • permanently affix a label that contains the classification number, top assisted speed, and motor wattage of the e-bike; and
  • comply with the equipment and manufacturing requirements for bicycles adopted by the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission.

 

A person is prohibited from tampering with or modifying an e-bike to change its speed capability without replacing the label, indicating a reclassification of the vehicle.

Summary of Engrossed First Substitute Bill:

An e-bike is further defined as excluding:

  • any vehicle capable of exceeding 20mph solely on its electric motor; and
  • any vehicle modified or designed to be easily modified to exceed limitations described in current e-bike classifications.

 

The Department of Licensing (DOL) must convene a work group to study and recommend a statutory framework for electric motorcycles (e-motos), and may contract with a third-party consultant for work group support and drafting the statutory framework. The work group must include the following members:

  • the secretary of the Washington State Department of Transportation or the secretary's designee;
  • the executive director of the Washington Traffic Safety Commission or the executive director's designee;
  • the chief of the Washington State Patrol or the chief's designee;
  • a representative from the Cooper Jones Active Transportation Safety Council;
  • a representative of the Association of Washington Cities;
  • a representative of the Washington State Association of Counties;
  • a representative of a nonprofit organization specializing in active transportation or electric bicycle safety;
  • a representative of a nonprofit organization with expertise in electric bicycles;
  • a representative of a statewide association representing parks and recreation; and
  • any other representative deemed necessary by DOL.

 

The work group must address:

  • how e-motos should be defined or classified, and if there are any new definitions for or modifications needed to other similarly defined vehicle or mobility types;
  • if e-motos should be subject to annual registration and license fees, and if driver licensing examinations should include an e-bike or e-moto component;
  • if the operation of an e-moto should be subject to mandatory driver education requirements, driver's license or permit requirements, or a minimum age requirement;
  • appropriate rules of the road or equipment requirements for e-motos;
  • appropriate penalties for deceptive e-bike marketing practices and e-bike tampering;
  • if e-bike manufacturers and vendors should provide disclosure statements or notices to consumers regarding the type of vehicle being purchased; and
  • any other component deemed necessary by the work group.

 

The work group must submit a final report, with recommendations or draft legislation, to the Office of the Governor and transportation committees of the Legislature by December 15, 2027.

Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Creates Committee/Commission/Task Force that includes Legislative members: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony on First Substitute:

PRO: The bill focuses on how to define an e-moto and puts them outside of current e-bike classifications. E-motos are scary and more dangerous than e-bikes. E-bike injuries are increasing nationwide, especially among 10 to 13 year olds. E-bikes modified to travel over legal speeds are becoming more accessible, and are practically motorcycles. E-motos create safety risks, are incorrectly labeled and marketed as e-bikes, and unfairly ruin the reputation of legal e-bikes. Many e-motos are operated by teenagers who are not educated in their use. A fish and wildlife survey says e-bike use is more practical for persons with limited mobility and for younger riders. Clear distinctions between e-bikes and e-motos will increase safety for all riders. E-bikes help people commute or run errands for daily activities. E-motos have no maximum speed controls and a limited ability to slow down, which creates different safety and risk concerns compared to e-bikes. Cities prefer an e-moto definition now. Enforcement through the juvenile court system is the only method to prosecute children riding e-motos or e-bikes unlawfully. E-motos do not fit within state law categories. E-bikes flatten hills and make cities more accessible. E-motos are a concern in other states, and have a negative impact on trails and within parks. There needs to be more education among young people regarding e-bikes and e-motos. E-motos are similar in appearance to e-bikes but go as fast as motorcycles.

Persons Testifying: PRO: Senator Sharon Shewmake, Prime Sponsor; Lee Lambert, Washington Bikes; Katherine Hollis, Eastrail Partners; Amy Falcone, Kirkland City Councilmember; Eunjae Jeon; William Callahan; Tate Kuhn; Malia Donohue; Emerson Repass; Clare Goodrich; Ted Weinberg, Mercer Island City Council; Steven Ellis, Association of Washington Cities; Hunter George, Washington Recreation and Park Association; Eddie Espinosa, Evergreen MTB Alliance.
Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: No one.
EFFECT OF HOUSE AMENDMENT(S):
  • Includes an intent section, with legislative recognition that many vehicles excluded from the e-bike definition fall under definitions for motorcycles and mopeds.
  • Expands the e-bike definition to exclude a vehicle designed, manufactured, or intended by the manufacturer or seller to be easily configured to not meet the requirements of an e-bike by a mechanical switch or button, changes in software settings controlling the drive system, or use of an online application.
  • Expands work group membership to include a representative of:
    1. a trails organization that represents certain nonmotorized users;
    2. a nonprofit motorcycle organization or motorcycle rider;
    3. a tribal government or its designee; and
    4. a statewide organization directly engaged in recreational e-moto use.
  • Expands the scope of work group responsibilities to include addressing opportunities for consistent enforcement of e-moto rules of the road and equipment requirements, and exploring the establishment of civil infractions that may be imposed by local jurisdictions on juveniles between the ages of 12 and 16 and civil penalties for adults who provide e-motos to individuals under the age of 16.
  • Moves up the effective date of the bill to take effect immediately.
  • Requires submission of an interim work group report by December 15, 2026, with recommendations and draft legislation on vehicle definitions, as well as on related registration, driver education and licensing, and rules of the road requirements.
  • Moves up the deadline for submission of the final work group report from December 15, 2027, to October 31, 2027.