H-1527.1

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1592

State of Washington
69th Legislature
2025 Regular Session
ByHouse Civil Rights & Judiciary (originally sponsored by Representatives Peterson, Low, Goodman, Nance, Parshley, Taylor, Ortiz-Self, Rude, Duerr, Richards, Steele, Barnard, Farivar, Simmons, Zahn, Timmons, Doglio, Pollet, and Reed)
READ FIRST TIME 02/21/25.
AN ACT Relating to public defense services; amending RCW 10.101.050, 10.101.060, 10.101.070, and 10.101.080; adding a new section to chapter 10.101 RCW; and adding a new section to chapter 2.56 RCW.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1. RCW 10.101.050 and 2005 c 157 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Beginning in fiscal year 2026, funding responsibility for public defense services shall be shared by the state, counties, and cities.
(a) Beginning in fiscal year 2026, the state shall be responsible for 50 percent of the cost of public defense services based on an average of the actual expenditures for public defense services reported, and paid for, by eligible counties for the previous five years looking back from fiscal year 2024. Beginning in fiscal year 2026, eligible counties shall not be responsible for public defense services costs that exceed this five-year average.
(b) Beginning in fiscal year 2026, the state shall be responsible for 50 percent of the cost of public defense services based on an average of the actual expenditures for public defense services paid for by eligible cities for the previous five years looking back from fiscal year 2024. Beginning in fiscal year 2026, eligible cities shall not be responsible for public defense services costs that exceed this five-year average.
(c) In fiscal year 2026 and thereafter, the state shall be responsible for all public defense services costs that exceed the five-year average set forth in this section.
The Washington state office of public defense shall disburse appropriated funds to eligible counties ((and cities)) for the ((purpose of improving the quality of public defense services))costs that exceed the five-year average set forth in this section consistent with RCW 10.101.060(2) (a) through (d) and to eligible cities for the costs that exceed the five-year average set forth in this section consistent with RCW 10.101.080.
(d) Any county funds supplanted by the funding distributions described in this section that were previously spent on public defense services may only be used for the following activities:
(i) Pretrial or precharge diversion programs;
(ii) Alternatives to incarceration;
(iii) Reentry services for those exiting incarceration;
(iv) Administrative expenditures related to the provision of public defense services including, but not limited to:
(A) Information technology;
(B) Human resources;
(C) Office space;
(D) Other indirect costs;
(v) Behavioral health facilities and services;
(vi) Costs of developing affordable and supportive housing, consistent with eligible activities outlined in RCW 82.14.540;
(vii) Other activities as approved by the Washington state office of public defense. ((Counties))
(2) Eligible counties may apply for up to their pro rata share as set forth in RCW 10.101.060 provided that counties conform to application procedures established by the office of public defense and improve the quality of services for both juveniles and adults. ((Cities may apply for moneys pursuant to the grant program set forth in RCW 10.101.080.))
(3) In order to receive funds, each ((applying)) county ((or city)) must ((require that attorneys providing public defense services attend training approved by the office of public defense at least once per calendar year. Each applying county or city shall report)):
(a) Report the expenditure for all public defense services in the previous calendar year, as well as case statistics for that year, including per attorney caseloads, and shall provide a copy of each current public defense contract to the office of public defense ((with its application. Each individual or organization that contracts to perform public defense services for a county or city shall report to the county or city));
(b) Require public defense lawyers to keep and report hours worked on each public defense case. The county shall collect data of assigned and resolved cases and annually report to the office of public defense and the Washington state bar association the (i) number of assigned and resolved cases of each case type consistent with appendix B of the Washington state bar association indigent defense standards, and (ii) average number of billable attorney hours spent on resolved cases of each type. The office of public defense shall create forms consistent with the collection of necessary data and regularly use the billable hour data to review and reconsider the categorization of each case type included in appendix B of the Washington state bar association indigent defense standards;
(c) Designate a public defense coordinator who shall serve as the primary contact between the county and the office of public defense. The public defense coordinator shall be a lawyer with public defense experience. Cities and counties are encouraged to work together and with the office of public defense to create public defense districts, if needed, consistent with RCW 36.26.020.
(4) Cities may apply for moneys pursuant to the distributions set forth in RCW 10.101.080. In order to receive funds, each applying city must require that attorneys providing public defense services attend training approved by the office of public defense at least once per calendar year. Each applying city shall report the expenditure for all public defense services in the previous calendar year, as well as case statistics for that year, including per attorney caseloads, and shall provide a copy of each current public defense contract to the office of public defense with its application. Each individual or organization that contracts to perform public defense services for a city shall report to the city hours billed for nonpublic defense legal services in the previous calendar year, including number and types of private cases.
Sec. 2. RCW 10.101.060 and 2005 c 157 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:
(1)(((a) Subject to the availability of funds appropriated for this purpose, the))The office of public defense shall disburse to ((applying))all counties that meet the requirements of RCW 10.101.050 designated funds under this chapter on a pro rata basis pursuant to the formula set forth in RCW 10.101.070 and shall disburse to eligible cities, funds pursuant to RCW 10.101.080.
(2) Any county with a population density of less than 50 persons per square mile may request that the office of public defense assume responsibility for providing all or a designated portion of the public defense services for defendants appearing in a court under the county's jurisdiction. If the office of public defense determines that it has the capacity to provide these services on behalf of the county:
(a) The office of public defense must notify the county of its decision to accept the request within 180 days.
(b) The county's pro rata share of funding described in RCW 10.101.070 shall be retained by the office of public defense for the purposes of delivering public defense services within the county. The office of public defense may designate employees of the department or contract with external legal counsel to deliver public defense services within the county.
(c) The office of public defense, at its discretion and consistent with standards for the provision of indigent defense services as endorsed by the Washington state bar association, may establish service delivery standards, support staffing, and administrative functions to facilitate the effective delivery of public defense services within the county.
(d) The county shall contribute funds in an amount equal to its responsibility for public defense services within its jurisdiction as described in RCW 10.101.050 toward the delivery of public defense services by the office of public defense within its jurisdiction.
(3) Each fiscal year for which it receives state funds under this chapter, a county or city must annually document to the office of public defense that it is meeting the standards for provision of indigent defense services as endorsed by the Washington state bar association or that the funds received under this chapter have been used to make appreciable demonstrable improvements in the delivery of public defense services((, including the following:
(i) Adoption by ordinance of a legal representation plan that addresses the factors in RCW 10.101.030. The plan must apply to any contract or agency providing indigent defense services for the county or city;
(ii) Requiring attorneys who provide public defense services to attend training under RCW 10.101.050;
(iii) Requiring attorneys who handle the most serious cases to meet specified qualifications as set forth in the Washington state bar association endorsed standards for public defense services or participate in at least one case consultation per case with office of public defense resource attorneys who are so qualified. The most serious cases include all cases of murder in the first or second degree, persistent offender cases, and class A felonies. This subsection (1)(a)(iii) does not apply to cities receiving funds under RCW 10.101.050 through 10.101.080;
(iv) Requiring contracts to address the subject of compensation for extraordinary cases;
(v) Identifying funding specifically for the purpose of paying experts (A) for which public defense attorneys may file ex parte motions, or (B) which should be specifically designated within a public defender agency budget;
(vi) Identifying funding specifically for the purpose of paying investigators (A) for which public defense attorneys may file ex parte motions, and (B) which should be specifically designated within a public defender agency budget.
(b) The cost of providing counsel in cases where there is a conflict of interest shall not be borne by the attorney or agency who has the conflict)). The office of public defense may create standards to determine the eligibility of counties and cities requesting funds.
(((2)))(4) The office of public defense shall monitor trial level public defense services to determine eligibility of counties and cities to receive state funds under this chapter. ((If a determination is made that a county or city receiving state funds under this chapter did not substantially comply with this section, the office of public defense shall notify the county or city of the failure to comply and unless the county or city contacts the office of public defense and substantially corrects the deficiencies within ninety days after the date of notice, or some other mutually agreed period of time, the county's or city's eligibility to continue receiving funds under this chapter is terminated. If an applying county or city disagrees with the determination of the office of public defense as to the county's or city's eligibility, the county or city may file an appeal with the advisory committee of the office of public defense within thirty days of the eligibility determination. The decision of the advisory committee is final))The office of public defense shall create data collection criteria and reporting forms to ensure consistent statewide data and application.
(5) The moneys under RCW 10.101.050 shall be distributed to each county and city determined to be eligible under this section by the office of public defense.
Sec. 3. RCW 10.101.070 and 2005 c 157 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:
The moneys shall be distributed to each county determined to be eligible to receive moneys by the office of public defense as determined under this section. ((Ninety percent of the funding appropriated))Beginning in fiscal year 2026 and in each year thereafter, the state shall appropriate to the office of public defense funds necessary to comply with RCW 10.101.050(1)(a). These funds shall be designated as "county moneys" and shall be distributed as follows:
(1) ((Six percent of the county moneys appropriated shall be distributed as a base allocation among the eligible counties. A county's base allocation shall be equal to this six percent divided by the total number of eligible counties.
(2) Ninety-four percent of the))The county moneys appropriated shall be distributed among the eligible counties as follows:
(a) Fifty percent of this amount shall be distributed on a pro rata basis to each eligible county based upon the population of the county as a percentage of the total population of all eligible counties; and
(b) Fifty percent of this amount shall be distributed on a pro rata basis to each eligible county based upon the annual number of criminal cases filed in the county superior court as a percentage of the total annual number of criminal cases filed in the superior courts of all eligible counties.
(2) Beginning in fiscal year 2027 and each year thereafter, the county moneys appropriated shall be distributed among the eligible counties on a pro rata basis based upon the annual number of cases filed in courts under the county's jurisdiction for which a public defender was assigned.
(3) Under this section:
(a) The population of the county is the most recent number determined by the office of financial management;
(b) The annual number of criminal cases filed in the county superior court is determined by the most recent annual report of the courts of Washington, as published by the office of the administrator for the courts;
(c) ((Distributions and eligibility for distributions in the 2005-2007 biennium shall be based on 2004 figures for the annual number of criminal cases that are filed as described under (b) of this subsection. Future distributions shall be based on the most recent figures for the annual number of criminal cases that are filed as described under (b) of this subsection))The annual number of cases filed in courts under the county's jurisdiction for which a public defender was assigned is determined by the most recent annual report of the courts of Washington, as published by the office of the administrator for the courts.
NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4. A new section is added to chapter 10.101 RCW to read as follows:
The office of public defense shall:
(1) Examine and make recommendations to reduce trial level public defense caseloads and backlogs;
(2) Require counties to report to the office of public defense the number of accused who are unrepresented because of a shortage of qualified lawyers;
(3) Make recommendations to increase retention of experienced public defenders in high-need counties; and
(4) Report findings and recommendations to the appropriate fiscal and policy committees of the legislature not later than December 1, 2026.
NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5. A new section is added to chapter 2.56 RCW to read as follows:
The office of the administrator for the courts shall collect data in a manner consistent with the responsibilities outlined in chapter 2.68 RCW detailing the number of cases assigned a public defender and shall include in its annual report of the courts of Washington the total number of such cases in each county and city.
Sec. 6. RCW 10.101.080 and 2007 c 59 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
The moneys under RCW 10.101.050 shall be distributed to each city determined to be eligible under this section by the office of public defense. ((Ten percent of the))Beginning in fiscal year 2026, and in each year thereafter, the state shall appropriate to the office of public defense funds necessary to comply with RCW 10.101.050(1)(b). The funding appropriated shall be designated as "city moneys" and distributed as follows:
(1) ((The))Beginning in fiscal year 2026, the office of public defense shall ((administer a grant program to select))distribute the city moneys to the cities eligible to receive city moneys on a pro rata basis based upon the annual number of misdemeanor criminal cases filed in courts under the city's jurisdiction or for which the city is financially responsible for which a public defender was assigned. ((Incorporated cities may apply for grants. Applying cities must conform to the requirements of RCW 10.101.050 and 10.101.060.))
(2) ((City moneys shall be distributed in a timely manner to accomplish the goals of the grants.
(3) Criteria for award of grants shall be established by the office of public defense after soliciting input from the association of Washington cities. Award of the grants shall be determined by the office of public defense.))Under this section the annual number of misdemeanor criminal cases filed in courts under the city's jurisdiction or for which the city is financially responsible for which a public defender was assigned is determined by the most recent annual report of the courts of Washington, as published by the office of the administrator for the courts.
--- END ---