NOTICE: Formatting and page numbering in this document may be different

from that in the original published version.


SIXTY-SECOND DAY


------------

MORNING SESSION


------------


Senate Chamber, Olympia, Saturday, March 11, 1995

      The Senate was called to order at 9:00 a.m. by President Pritchard. The Secretary called the roll and announced to the President that all Senators were present except Senators Cal Anderson, Finkbeiner, Moyer and Rinehart. On motion of Senator Loveland, Senator Cal Anderson was excused. On motion of Senator Ann Anderson, Senators Finkbeiner and Moyer were excused.

      The Sergeant at Arms Color Guard, consisting of Pages Catherine Frerichs and Jamie Kline, presented the Colors. President Pritchard offered the prayer.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Spanel, the reading of the Journal of the previous day was dispensed with and it was approved.


MESSAGES FROM THE HOUSE

March 9, 1995

MR. PRESIDENT:

      The House has passed:

      SECOND ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL NO. 1130,

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1775,

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2036, and the same are herewith transmitted.

TIMOTHY A. MARTIN, Chief Clerk


March 9, 1995

MR. PRESIDENT:

      The House has passed:

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1104,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1231,

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1527,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1540,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1542,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1553,

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1555,

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1556,

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1594,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1625,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1639,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1663,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1665,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1673,

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1704,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1705,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1707,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1709,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1739,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1741,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1742,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1758,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1761,

      SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1814,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1843,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1862,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1871,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1910,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1938,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1977,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1991,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 2022,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 2032, and the same are herewith transmitted.

TIMOTHY A. MARTIN, Chief Clerk

 

March 9, 1995

MR. PRESIDENT:

      The House has passed:

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1209,

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1317,

      SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1318,

      ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1330,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1430,

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1431,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1432,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1437,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1459,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1465,

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1471,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1476,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1483,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1507,

      SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1524,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1536,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1632,

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1903,

      HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 4001,

      HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 4020, and the same are herewith transmitted.

TIMOTHY A. MARTIN, Chief Clerk


March 9, 1995

MR. PRESIDENT:

      The House has passed:

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1866,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1872,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1891,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1964,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1995,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2034,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 2039,

      HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 4017,

      HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 4018,

      HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 4030, and the same are herewith transmitted.

TIMOTHY A. MARTIN, Chief Clerk


INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS

 

HB 1104            by Representatives McMorris, Campbell, Pennington, Mulliken, Koster, Sheldon, Padden, Kremen, Smith, Chandler, Honeyford, Hargrove, McMahan, Benton, D. Schmidt, Chappell, Thompson, Fuhrman, Delvin, Schoesler, Casada, Blanton, Stevens, Johnson, Huff, Foreman, Hymes, Sherstad, Robertson, Backlund, L. Thomas, Mielke, Cairnes, Elliot, Goldsmith and Buck

 

Removing requirements relating to carrying firearms unloaded and enclosed in an opaque case or wrapper.

 

Referred to Committee on Law and Justice.

 

2EHB 1130        by Representatives Crouse, Dellwo, Padden, Brown, Silver, Johnson, McMorris, Elliot, Stevens, Koster and Schoesler

 

Restricting the ringing of bells or sounding of whistles on locomotives.

 

Referred to Committee on Transportation.

 

ESHB 1209        by House Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Representatives K. Schmidt, Mielke, Johnson, Quall, Mitchell, Buck, Romero, Horn and Huff)

 

Regulating commercial vehicle safety.

 

Referred to Committee on Transportation.

 

SHB 1231          by House Committee on Agriculture and Ecology (originally sponsored by Representatives Rust, Chandler, Valle, Cole, Mastin and Chopp)

 

Promoting the recycled content of products and buildings.

 

Referred to Committee on Ecology and Parks.

 

ESHB 1317        by House Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Representatives Robertson, Cairnes, B. Thomas, Mitchell, Van Luven, Dyer, Lambert, Radcliff, D. Schmidt, Backlund, Cooke, Reams, Campbell, Stevens, L. Thomas and Koster)

 

Revising the selection process for transportation systems and facilities demonstration projects.

 

Referred to Committee on Transportation.

 

2SHB 1318        by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Carlson, Mulliken and Mastin) (by request of Higher Education Coordinating Board)

 

Revising provisions for the Washington scholars program.

 

Referred to Committee on Higher Education.

 

E2SHB 1330      by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Dyer, Dellwo and Backlund) (by request of Department of Health)

 

Modifying health facility and services provisions.

 

Referred to Committee on Health and Long-Term Care.

 

SHB 1430          by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Carlson, Sehlin, Cooke, Sommers, Dellwo and Basich) (by request of Joint Committee on Pension Policy)

 

Exempting certain employers from additional retirement contributions.

 

Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.

 

ESHB 1431        by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representative Silver) (by request of Department of Retirement Systems)

 

Paying for department of retirement system expenses.

 

Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.

 

SHB 1432          by House Committee on Finance (originally sponsored by Representatives Brumsickle and Reams)

 

Providing for notice statements regarding county financial matters.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Operations.

 

SHB 1437          by House Committee on Natural Resources (originally sponsored by Representatives Foreman, Chandler, Mastin and B. Thomas)

 

Revising lease rates for amateur radio electronic repeater sites.

 

Referred to Committee on Natural Resources.

 

SHB 1459          by House Committee on Finance (originally sponsored by Representatives Van Luven and Sheldon)

 

Exempting from business and occupation tax reimbursements and advances received by property management companies for the payment of wages and benefits to on-site employees.

 

Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.

 

HB 1465            by Representatives Silver and Sommers (by request of Secretary of State Munro)

 

Concerning the employee suggestion program.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Operations.

 

ESHB 1471        by House Committee on Law and Justice (originally sponsored by Representatives Padden and Appelwick)

 

Regulating homeowners' associations.

 

Referred to Committee on Law and Justice.

 

SHB 1476          by House Committee on Health Care (originally sponsored by Representative Dyer) (by request of Department of Social and Health Services)

 

Modifying federal financial participation related to health insurer's and children's health care.

 

Referred to Committee on Health and Long-Term Care.

 

SHB 1483          by House Committee on Natural Resources (originally sponsored by Representatives Pennington, Elliot, Stevens, Huff, Mielke, Johnson, L. Thomas, McMahan and Sheahan)

 

Revising provisions on the prevention and suppression of forest wild fires.

 

Referred to Committee on Natural Resources.

 

SHB 1507          by House Committee on Capital Budget (originally sponsored by Representatives Ogden, Radcliff, Jacobsen, Brumsickle, Chopp and Dickerson) (by request of Washington State Historical Society)

 

Requiring a process to solicit proposals for and prioritize heritage capital projects.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Operations.

 

2SHB 1524        by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Chandler, Mastin and McMorris)

 

Changing weights and measures regulations.

 

Referred to Committee on Agriculture and Agricultural Trade and Development.

 

ESHB 1527        by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Benton, Clements, Koster, Dellwo, Campbell, Boldt, Kessler, Wolfe, Mielke, Thompson, Delvin, Carlson, Pelesky, D. Schmidt, Chopp, Van Luven, R. Fisher, Hickel, Sehlin, Costa, Ballasiotes, Pennington, Radcliff, Carrell, Hatfield, Romero, B. Thomas, Beeksma, Cody, Cooke, Dickerson, Conway, Jacobsen, Basich, Hargrove, L. Thomas, Chandler, Kremen, Robertson, Johnson, K. Schmidt, Smith, Dyer, Elliot, Blanton, Goldsmith, Mulliken, Schoesler and Brumsickle)

 

Recognizing veterans of World War II.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Operations.

 

SHB 1536          by House Committee on Health Care (originally sponsored by Representative Dyer)

 

Revising the Washington long-term care partnership.

 

Referred to Committee on Health and Long-Term Care.

 

SHB 1540          by House Committee on Natural Resources (originally sponsored by Representatives Fuhrman, Jacobsen, Buck, Campbell, Basich, Hargrove, L. Thomas, Chandler, Robertson, Honeyford, Johnson, Thompson, Dyer, Delvin, Elliot, Mielke, Blanton, McMorris, McMahan, Mulliken, Clements, Cooke, Brumsickle and Stevens)

 

Expanding the authority of the fish and wildlife commission.

 

Referred to Committee on Natural Resources.

 

HB 1542            by Representatives Brown, Cooke, Dickerson and Costa (by request of Department of Social and Health Services)

 

Modifying placement of juveniles, specifically addressing independent living.

 

Referred to Committee on Human Services and Corrections.

 

HB 1553            by Representative L. Thomas (by request of Attorney General Gregoire)

 

Concerning the proper form of certain ballot titles.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Operations.

 

ESHB 1555        by House Committee on Agriculture and Ecology (originally sponsored by Representatives McMorris, Foreman, Mastin, Chandler, Chappell, Koster, Boldt, Schoesler, Johnson, Honeyford, Clements, Regala, Basich, Hargrove, L. Thomas, Thompson, Delvin, Elliot, Goldsmith, McMahan, Mulliken, Fuhrman, Stevens and Lisk)

 

Revising department of ecology entry authority for water quality complaints caused by agricultural activity.

 

Referred to Committee on Ecology and Parks.

 

ESHB 1556        by House Committee on Law and Justice (originally sponsored by Representatives Wolfe, Boldt, Scott, Romero, B. Thomas, Johnson, Talcott, Delvin, Carrell, Campbell, Van Luven, Cooke, Dickerson, Kessler, Basich, Conway, Smith and Costa)

 

Revising procedures for determining visitation rights for persons other than a parent.

 

Referred to Committee on Law and Justice.

 

ESHB 1594        by House Committee on Law and Justice (originally sponsored by Representatives Foreman, Sherstad, Campbell, Benton, McMahan, Elliot, Chandler and Hargrove)

 

Requiring blood tests of injured persons if persons rendering aid came in contact with their blood.

 

Referred to Committee on Law and Justice.

 

SHB 1625          by House Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Representatives Reams, Brumsickle, Casada, Morris, Hargrove, Buck, Radcliff, Benton, Grant, Talcott, Hymes, Thompson, Elliot and Huff)

 

Regulating payment of impact fees.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Operations.

 

SHB 1632          by House Committee on Natural Resources (originally sponsored by Representatives Horn, Basich and Fuhrman)

 

Exchanging certain public lands.

 

Referred to Committee on Natural Resources.

 

SHB 1639          by House Committee on Finance (originally sponsored by Representatives B. Thomas, Van Luven, Morris, Horn, Campbell, Kremen and Sheldon)

 

Exempting vessel manufacturers and dealers from the use tax.

 

Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.

 

HB 1663            by Representatives Schoesler, Carlson, Brumsickle, Morris, Chopp, Tokuda, Dickerson, Campbell, Costa, Benton, Robertson, D. Schmidt, Thompson, Cooke, Mason and Dyer

 

Concerning the taxation of property donated to a nonprofit entity.

 

Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.

 

SHB 1665          by House Committee on Agriculture and Ecology (originally sponsored by Representatives McMorris, Campbell, Honeyford, Koster, Johnson, Huff, Cairnes, Fuhrman, D. Schmidt, Padden and Thompson)

 

Limiting review or approval of on-site sewage disposal systems by the department of ecology.

 

Referred to Committee on Ecology and Parks.

 

SHB 1673          by House Committee on Finance (originally sponsored by Representatives Dickerson, Mason, Morris, Chappell, Wolfe, Kessler, Hatfield, Conway, Benton, Kremen, Cody and Mastin)

 

Expanding property tax deferrals for senior citizens and persons retired by reason of physical disability.

 

Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.

 

ESHB 1704        by House Committee on Commerce and Labor (originally sponsored by Representatives Lisk, L. Thomas, Ballasiotes, Kremen, Chappell, Cooke, Goldsmith, Padden, Radcliff, Mulliken, Pennington, McMorris, Smith, Delvin, Hickel, Mastin, Sehlin, Beeksma, Robertson, Cairnes, Koster, Brumsickle, D. Schmidt, Horn, Reams, Campbell, Chandler, Backlund, McMahan and Elliot)

 

Eliminating registration requirements for sellers of travel.

 

Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Trade.

 

SHB 1705          by House Committee on Energy and Utilities (originally sponsored by Representatives Huff, Casada, Kremen, Patterson, Grant, Kessler, G. Fisher, Mielke, Crouse, Chandler, Hankins, Mitchell, Hatfield, Campbell, Smith, L. Thomas, Horn and Benton)

 

Excluding utility line clearing from the definition of retail sale.

 

Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.

 

HB 1707            by Representatives Hargrove, Sheahan and Pelesky

 

Correcting references to classification of cities and towns.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Operations.

 

HB 1709            by Representatives Carrell, Padden, Campbell, Backlund, Costa, Conway, Delvin, Robertson, Thompson, McMahan, Benton and Elliot

 

Limiting certain offenses to no more than fifteen percent good time credits.

 

Referred to Committee on Human Services and Corrections.

 

SHB 1739          by House Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Representatives Hymes, L. Thomas, Mielke, Fuhrman, G. Fisher, Grant and Reams)

 

Delegating to local municipal jurisdictions of hydraulic project approval authority.

 

Referred to Committee on Ecology and Parks.

 

SHB 1741          by House Committee on Agriculture and Ecology (originally sponsored by Representatives Chandler and Mastin)

 

Providing moneys for wine and wine grape research.

 

Referred to Committee on Agriculture and Agricultural Trade and Development.

 

HB 1742            by Representatives Mitchell, Casada and K. Schmidt

 

Providing that the department of community, trade, and economic development provide support for the energy facility site evaluation council.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Operations.

 

SHB 1758          by House Committee on Health Care (originally sponsored by Representatives Backlund, Sherstad, Dyer, Morris and Cody)

 

Creating the health professional data information system.

 

Referred to Committee on Health and Long-Term Care.

 

HB 1761            by Representatives Casada, Hankins, Patterson, Crouse, Huff, Carlson, Morris, Mielke, Mitchell and Kessler

 

Clarifying physical conditions for determining the output of major energy projects.

 

Referred to Committee on Energy, Telecommunications and Utilities.

 

ESHB 1775        by House Committee on Agriculture and Ecology (originally sponsored by Representatives Mulliken, Mastin, Schoesler, Chandler, McMorris, Robertson, Honeyford and Elliot)

 

Specifying how surplus water may be spread to contiguous lands.

 

Referred to Committee on Senate Select Committee on Water Policy.

 

2SHB 1814        by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representative Carlson)

 

Changing provisions relating to the Washington award for vocational excellence.

 

Referred to Committee on Higher Education.

 

HB 1843            by Representatives Lisk, Cole, Hargrove, Romero, Horn and Conway

 

Clarifying the terms of the members of the advisory board of plumbers.

 

Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Trade.

 

SHB 1862          by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Reams, K. Schmidt, Horn, Hankins and Blanton)

 

Promoting the development of model home-matching programs.

 

Referred to Committee on Financial Institutions and Housing.

 

HB 1866            by Representatives Elliot, K. Schmidt and Benton

 

Revising certain aeronautics statutes.

 

Referred to Committee on Transportation.

 

SHB 1871          by House Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Representatives Sheahan and Schoesler)

 

Providing equalization for transit systems imposing an utility tax.

 

Referred to Committee on Transportation.

 

HB 1872            by Representatives Crouse, Dyer, Dellwo, Wolfe, Morris, Sherstad, Conway, Cody and Padden

 

Modifying the authority of the board of physical therapy.

 

Referred to Committee on Health and Long-Term Care.

 

HB 1891            by Representatives Smith, Wolfe and L. Thomas

 

Providing parity among financial institutions.

 

Referred to Committee on Financial Institutions and Housing.

 

ESHB 1903        by House Committee on Agriculture and Ecology (originally sponsored by Representatives Clements, Casada, Chandler and Schoesler)

 

Establishing new procedures for rule adoption by administrative agencies.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Operations.

 

SHB 1910          by House Committee on Commerce and Labor (originally sponsored by Representatives Goldsmith, Cairnes, Hargrove and Lisk)

 

Providing for industrial insurance self-insurers to determine benefits for permanent disability.

 

Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Trade.

 

SHB 1938          by House Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance (originally sponsored by Representatives L. Thomas, Mielke, Horn and Reams)

 

Modifying the administration of the responsibilities of self-insurers.

 

Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Trade.

 

SHB 1964          by House Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Representatives K. Schmidt, R. Fisher, Robertson, Cairnes, Ogden, Hankins, Elliot, Johnson, Chandler, Scott, Tokuda, Quall, Backlund, Chopp, Horn, Koster, McMahan, Mitchell, Skinner, Benton, D. Schmidt and Stevens)

 

Simplifying accident report record-keeping.

 

Referred to Committee on Transportation.

 

SHB 1977          by House Committee on Energy and Utilities (originally sponsored by Representatives Mielke, Casada, Grant, Appelwick, Basich, Smith and L. Thomas)

 

Penalizing theft of telecommunication and cable services.

 

Referred to Committee on Energy, Telecommunications and Utilities.

 

HB 1991            by Representatives Silver, Ogden, Sommers, Valle, Chandler, Stevens and Fuhrman (by request of Legislative Budget Committee)

 

Reimbursing the legislative budget committee.

 

Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.

 

SHB 1995          by House Committee on Health Care (originally sponsored by Representatives Mielke, Morris and Dyer)

 

Providing an exemption and an offset for insurance premium and prepayment obligations for the high risk pool.

 

Referred to Committee on Health and Long-Term Care.

 

HB 2022            by Representative Fuhrman

 

Making mining claims.

 

Referred to Committee on Natural Resources.

 

HB 2032            by Representatives K. Schmidt, R. Fisher, Hatfield, Cairnes, Brown, Backlund, Romero, Johnson, D. Schmidt, Elliot, Benton and Blanton

 

Depositing certain sales or use tax revenue into the transportation fund.

 

Referred to Committee on Transportation.

 

SHB 2034          by House Committee on Higher Education (originally sponsored by Representatives Silver, Quall, Sommers and Basich) (by request of State Board for Community and Technical Colleges)

 

Changing community and technical college tuition refund and fee cancellation provisions.

 

Referred to Committee on Higher Education.

 

ESHB 2036        by House Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance (originally sponsored by Representative L. Thomas)

 

Concerning the sale of consumer credit unemployment insurance.

 

Referred to Committee on Financial Institutions and Housing.

 

HB 2039            by Representative Kremen and Chandler

 

Prescribing rights for certain applications for water rights or water transfers.

 

Referred to Committee on Senate Select Committee on Water Policy

.

HJM 4001          by Representatives Campbell, B. Thomas, Chappell, Schoesler, Talcott, Dyer, Mastin, Chandler, Casada, Kremen, Sheahan, Backlund, Beeksma, Pennington, Lambert, Smith, Delvin, Robertson, Buck, Elliot, Mulliken, Blanton, Benton, McMahan, Hargrove, Radcliff, Koster, Scott, Cooke, Johnson, Thompson, Goldsmith, Crouse, Brumsickle, G. Fisher, Basich, Grant, Sehlin, Van Luven, Hankins, McMorris, Fuhrman, Sheldon, Huff, Silver and Hymes

 

Petitioning the federal government to cease and desist mandates that are beyond the scope of its powers.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Operations.

 

HJM 4017          by Representatives Thompson, Fuhrman, Stevens, G. Fisher, Elliot, Sheldon, Cairnes, B. Thomas, Beeksma, Schoesler and Horn

 

Requesting Congress to control or eradicate nonnative noxious weeds.

 

Referred to Committee on Agriculture and Agricultural Trade and Development.

 

HJM 4018          by Representatives Casada, Chappell, Brumsickle, Kessler, Huff, Hankins, Kremen, Grant, L. Thomas and Mastin

 

Requesting a variance in order to preserve man-made wetlands.

 

Referred to Committee on Ecology and Parks.

 

HJM 4020          by Representatives Campbell, Hatfield, Wolfe, B. Thomas, McMorris, Brumsickle, Morris, Radcliff, Elliot, Beeksma, Kessler, Carrell and L. Thomas

 

Encouraging schools to provide an elementary gun safety program.

 

Referred to Committee on Education.

 

HJM 4030          by Representatives Hankins, Honeyford, Delvin, Grant and Kessler

 

Concerning federal funds for the cleanup of the Hanford waste disposal site.

 

Referred to Committee on Ecology and Parks.


SECOND READING

CONFIRMATION OF GUBERNATORIAL APPOINTMENT


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Fraser, Gubernatorial Appointment No. 9077, Carol Vipperman, as a member of the Board of Trustees for The Evergreen State College, was confirmed.


CONFIRMATION OF CAROL VIPPERMAN


      The Secretary called the roll. The appointment was confirmed by the following vote: Yeas, 45; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 3.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 45.

      Absent: Senator Rinehart - 1.

      Excused: Senators Anderson, C., Finkbeiner and Moyer - 3.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Loveland, Senator Rinehart was excused.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5871, by Senators Pelz, Hale, Fraser, Newhouse and Deccio

 

Clarifying the terms of the members of the advisory board of plumbers.


      The bill was read the second time.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Pelz, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 5871 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 5871.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 5871 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 45; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 3.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 45.

      Absent: Senator Deccio - 1.

      Excused: Senators Anderson, C., Moyer and Rinehart - 3.

      SENATE BILL NO. 5871, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


MOTION


      At 9:21 a.m., on motion of Senator Spanel, the Senate was declared to be at ease.


      The Senate was called to order at 11:30 a.m. by President Pritchard.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Spanel, the Senate advanced to the ninth order of business.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Spanel, the Committee on Law and Justice was relieved of House Bill No. 1081.

      On motion of Senator Spanel, House Bill No. 1081 was referred to the Committee on Human Services and Corrections.


MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION


      Having served prior notice, Senator Snyder moved to now reconsider the vote by which Substitute Senate Bill No 5537 failed to pass the Senate March 9, 1995.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the motion by Senator Snyder to reconsider the vote by which Substitute Senate Bill No. 5537 failed to pass the Senate.

      The motion by Senator Snyder carried on a rising vote and the Senate will reconsider the vote by which Substitute Senate Bill No. 5537 failed to pass the Senate.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Spanel, the Senate reverted to the seventh order of business.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5537, on reconsideration.

      Debate ensued.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5537, on reconsideration, and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 26; Nays, 22; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, C., Bauer, Drew, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Kohl, Loveland, McAuliffe, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Sutherland, Winsley and Wojahn - 26.

      Voting nay: Senators Anderson, A., Cantu, Deccio, Finkbeiner, Hale, Hochstatter, Johnson, Long, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Palmer, Prince, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Strannigan, Swecker, West and Wood - 22.

      Excused: Senator Moyer - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5537, on reconsideration, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5126, by Senators Drew, Oke and Owen (by request of Department of Fish and Wildlife)

 

Authorizing retention of specified moneys recovered through forfeitures or court-ordered restitution.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Drew, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5126 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5126 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Drew, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5126 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5126.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5126 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 37; Nays, 11; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, C., Bauer, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 37.

      Voting nay: Senators Anderson, A., Cantu, Deccio, Hale, Hochstatter, Johnson, Morton, Newhouse, Palmer, Roach and Schow - 11.

      Excused: Senator Moyer - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5126, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5175, by Senators Pelz and Deccio (by request of Liquor Control Board)

 

Permitting certain retail liquor licensees to be licensed as manufacturers.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Pelz, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5175 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5175 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Pelz, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5175 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5175.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5175 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 48.

      Excused: Senator Moyer - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5175, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5229, by Senators Owen, Prince and Haugen (by request of Department of Transportation)

 

Authorizing tuition waivers for ferry employees.


      The bill was read the second time.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Bauer, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 5229 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 5229.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 5229 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 35; Nays, 13; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 35.

      Voting nay: Senators Cantu, Deccio, Hale, Hochstatter, Johnson, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Palmer, Schow and Strannigan - 13.

      Excused: Senator Moyer - 1.

      SENATE BILL NO. 5229, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5920, by Senators Franklin, Pelz, McAuliffe, Rasmussen, Snyder, Winsley, Fairley and C. Anderson

 

Authorizing delegation of nursing care tasks in public schools.


      The bill was read the second time.


MOTIONS


      Senator Franklin moved that the following amendment be adopted:

      Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

      "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The legislature recognizes that many students in the K-12 setting need appropriate nursing service support to actively and fully participate in their educational program. It is not the intent of the legislature to replace the role of school nurses, but to increase their ability to delegate specific tasks safely to school employees for students needing routine health care services. The opportunity to delegate to registered and certified nursing assistants could enhance the viability and quality of care and learning in the common schools of this state. It is not the intent of the legislature to require school employees to be certified nursing assistants. Only those employees who carry out delegated nursing tasks as delineated pursuant to sections 1, 2, and 4 through 7 of this act are required to be registered or certified nurse assistants.

      (1) Registered nurses shall have the option to delegate to certified and registered nursing assistants the following tasks: Oral and topical medications and ointments; nose, ear, and eye drops and ointments; catheterization using only clean technique as provided by RCW 18.79.290; suppositories; and gastrostomy feedings in established, wound-healed gastrostomies.

      (2) The following procedures shall not be delegated: Sterile procedures; crossing the barrier of the skin; and management, manipulation, or care for intravenous devices, intravenous lines, infusion of intravenous substances, enemas, colostomy care, or dressing changes.

      (3) Delegation shall only occur for students with a "stable and predictable" condition as defined by the Washington state nursing care quality assurance commission. In addition to this section and sections 4 through 7 of this act, nurse delegation in common schools is subject to applicable provisions of law.

      (4) In order to protect the public health and safety, at the beginning of the school year public school districts and private schools that provide for delegation of nursing tasks under this section shall designate as delegatees one certificated employee or one classified employee and one alternate at each school. Any delegatee shall:

      (a) Show proof of training in infection control, developed and provided by the school district;

      (b) Register with the department of health and be subject to the uniform disciplinary act, chapter 18.130 RCW, for purposes of tasks performed as a delegatee; and

      (c) Meet all training requirements provided by the delegating nurse in accordance with protocols set by the nursing care quality assurance commission.

      (5) Sections 1, 2, and 4 through 7 of this act do not apply to emergency first aid situations.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout sections 1 and 4 through 7 of this act.

      (1) "Registered nurse" means school district nursing personnel who are licensed pursuant to chapter 18.79 RCW and may in addition hold state board of education certification as a school nurse.

      (2) "Delegating nurse" means a registered nurse as defined in this section.

      (3) "Delegatee" means a certified or registered nursing assistant.

      Sec. 3. RCW 18.79.260 and 1994 sp.s. c 9 s 426 are each amended to read as follows:

      A registered nurse under his or her license may perform for compensation nursing care, as that term is usually understood, of the ill, injured, or infirm, and in the course thereof, she or he may do the following things that shall not be done by a person not so licensed, except as provided in RCW 18.79.270:

      (1) At or under the general direction of a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, osteopathic physician and surgeon, podiatric physician and surgeon, physician assistant, osteopathic physician assistant, or advanced registered nurse practitioner acting within the scope of his or her license, administer medications, treatments, tests, and inoculations, whether or not the severing or penetrating of tissues is involved and whether or not a degree of independent judgment and skill is required except as provided in sections 4 through 7 of this act;

      (2) Delegate to other persons engaged in nursing, the functions outlined in subsection (1) of this section;

      (3) Delegate to certified and registered nursing assistants credentialed under chapter 18.130 RCW the functions outlined in sections 1 and 4 through 7 of this act;

      (4) Instruct nurses in technical subjects pertaining to nursing;

      (((4))) (5) Hold herself or himself out to the public or designate herself or himself as a registered nurse.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. (1) The Washington state nursing care quality assurance commission, as provided by chapter 18.79 RCW, shall:

      (a) Define "stable and predictable" conditions as used in section 1 of this act;

      (b) Develop a clear and readable model informed consent form that substantially complies with chapter 7.70 RCW for nurses to use to provide consumers, delegatees, and the delegating nurse information regarding the delegation process, the rights of refusal by the delegatee and the consumer and/or the parents or guardian, and agreement by all parties of the delegation of the nursing task; and

      (c) Develop delegation protocols that shall be available to schools by June 1, 1996, that include the following requirements:

      (i) Thorough student assessment by the registered nurse before consideration of delegation;

      (ii) The registered nurse obtaining written consent signed by the student and/or parent or guardian and the delegatee agreeing to the provision of delegated nursing tasks;

      (iii) The registered nurse analyzing the complexity of the nursing task that is considered for delegation;

      (iv) The registered nurse evaluating the ability of the delegatee to perform the delegated nursing task in the absence of direct nurse supervision;

      (v) The registered nurse training the delegatee the specific delegated nursing task for each student. The training requirements may vary depending upon the degree of complexity of the delegated task;

      (vi) The registered nurse informing the delegatee that the delegated nursing task is specific to a student and is not transferable;

      (vii) The registered nurse initially observing the delegatee performing the delegated task;

      (viii) The registered nurse providing written instructions to the delegatee on delegated nursing tasks;

      (ix) The registered nurse informing the delegatee to be alert to any changes observed in student status that could require reassessment by the registered nurse;

      (x) The registered nurse providing documentation of compliance or barriers to compliance in carrying out nurse delegation tasks and a written plan for nursing supervision and reevaluation of nursing tasks; and

      (xi) The registered nurse having proof that the delegatee has received infection control training from the school district.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. No one may coerce a registered nurse into compromising student safety by requiring the registered nurse to delegate if the registered nurse determines it is inappropriate to do so. The registered nurse shall have total discretion and final decision making in determining the appropriateness of delegation.

      (1) The registered nurse, delegatee, and student and/or student's parent or guardian must sign an informed consent form regarding the delegation process, rights of refusal, and agreement to delegation of nursing tasks.

      (2) Registered nurses shall not be subject to any employer reprisal or commission disciplinary action for refusing to delegate tasks or refusing to provide the required training for delegation if the registered nurse determines delegation may compromise student safety.

      (3) The delegatee shall have the right to refuse the assignment of a delegated task and the student and/or the parent or guardian shall have the right to refuse the delegation of nursing tasks.

      (4) Delegatees shall not be subject to any employer reprisal or commission disciplinary action for refusing to accept delegation of a nursing task.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. (1) The delegating nurse and delegatee shall be held accountable for their own actions in the delegation process.

      (2) Registered nurses acting within the protocols of their delegation authority are immune from suit in any action, civil or criminal, performed in the course of their delegation duties.

      (3) Delegatees are immune from suit in any civil or criminal action, when following written delegation instructions from registered nurses, and performed in the course of their duties.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. Public and private schools are subject to nurse delegation protocols under RCW 18.79.260 and 18.79.290 and sections 5 through 7 of this act, excluding those tasks under RCW 28A.210.260 and 28A.210.270.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. A new section is added to chapter 18.79 RCW to read as follows:

      Nurse delegation in public and private schools is governed by sections 1, 2, and 4 through 7 of this act.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. By June 1, 1996, the nursing care quality assurance commission shall adopt rules incorporating the requirements of sections 1, 2, and 4 through 7 of this act for the delegation of clean catheterization by registered nurses to delegatees in schools.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. The department of health in consultation with the nursing care quality assurance commission, office of the superintendent of public instruction, and other interested parties shall submit a report on nurse delegation in public schools to the legislative health committees by December 1997. The office of the superintendent of public instruction shall also implement communication strategies to assure that students, parents and/or guardians, the delegating nurse, and the delegatee have a complete understanding of the delegation process and the implications of current or revised statutes and rules. The commission shall provide data on incidence of harm to the public due to the delegation of nursing tasks, reports of registered nurses being coerced to delegate, coercion of delegatees to accept delegated nursing tasks, the number of students who received delegation, and the accumulated time involved in the delegation of nursing tasks. The report should include relevant information on serving health care needs to students before and after nurse delegation.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. Sections 1, 2, and 4 through 7 of this act are each added to chapter 28A.210 RCW.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. Sections 1 through 3 and 5 through 7 of this act shall take effect September 1, 1996."


      Senator Franklin moved that the following amendment by Senators Franklin, Gaspard, Rasmussen, Deccio, Wood, McAuliffe, Quigley, Fairley, Winsley, Owen and Oke to the striking amendment be adopted:

      On page 5, after line 35 of the amendment, insert the following:

      "NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. The legislative budget committee shall study possible funding sources for adding more registered nurses to public and private schools in Washington state. The committee shall use data on the number of school nurses in each district and the number of children needing nursing care in schools during the school year 1995-96, as compiled by the superintendent of public instruction. The committee shall report to appropriate committees of the legislature by December 1996."

      Renumber the remaining sections consecutively.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senators Franklin, Gaspard, Rasmussen, Deccio, Wood, McAuliffe, Quigley, Fairley, Winsley, Owen and Oke on page 5, after line 35, to the striking amendment by Senator Franklin to Senate Bill No. 5920.

      The motion by Senator Franklin carried and the amendment to the striking amendment was adopted.


      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the striking amendment, as amended, by Senator Franklin to Senate Bill No. 5920.

      The motion by Senator Franklin carried and the striking amendment, as amended, was adopted.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Franklin, the following title amendment was adopted:

      On page 1, line 1 of the title, after "schools;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 18.79.260; adding new sections to chapter 28A.210 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 18.79 RCW; creating new sections; and providing an effective date."

      On motion of Senator Franklin, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Senate Bill No. 5920 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 5920.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 5920 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 48.

      Excused: Senator Moyer - 1.

      ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 5920, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5000, by Senators Loveland, Snyder, Wojahn, Sheldon, Gaspard, Franklin, Haugen, Rasmussen, Quigley, Owen, McAuliffe, Winsley, McCaslin, Drew, Morton, Prentice, Bauer, Spanel, Hale and Deccio

 

Reducing property taxes.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Loveland, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5000 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      Senator Cantu moved that the following amendment by Senators Cantu and Oke be adopted:

      On page 1, after line 5, insert the following:

      "Sec. 1. RCW 84.55.010 and 1979 ex.s. c 218 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) Except as provided in this chapter, the levy for a taxing district in any year shall be set so that the regular property taxes payable in the following year shall not exceed one hundred six percent or one hundred percent plus inflation, whichever is lower, of the amount of regular property taxes lawfully levied for such district in the highest of the three most recent years in which such taxes were levied for such district plus an additional dollar amount calculated by multiplying the increase in assessed value in that district resulting from new construction, improvements to property, and any increase in the assessed value of state-assessed property by the regular property tax levy rate of that district for the preceding year.

      (2) For the purposes of this section, "inflation" means the percentage change in the implicit price deflator for the United States, as published by the federal department of commerce, for the fiscal year ending June 30th of the year preceding the year in which the taxes are due.

      Sec. 2. RCW 84.55.020 and 1971 ex.s. c 288 s 21 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) Notwithstanding the limitation set forth in RCW 84.55.010, the first levy for a taxing district created from consolidation of similar taxing districts shall be set so that the regular property taxes payable in the following year shall not exceed one hundred six percent or one hundred percent plus inflation, whichever is lower, of the sum of the amount of regular property taxes lawfully levied for each component taxing district in the highest of the three most recent years in which such taxes were levied for such district plus the additional dollar amount calculated by multiplying the increase in assessed value in each component district resulting from new construction and improvements to property by the regular property tax rate of each component district for the preceding year.

      (2) For the purposes of this section, "inflation" means the percentage change in the implicit price deflator for the United States, as published by the federal department of commerce, for the fiscal year ending June 30th of the year preceding the year in which the taxes are due.

      Sec. 3. RCW 35.61.210 and 1990 c 234 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

      The board of park commissioners may levy or cause to be levied a general tax on all the property located in said park district each year not to exceed fifty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value of the property in such park district. In addition, the board of park commissioners may levy or cause to be levied a general tax on all property located in said park district each year not to exceed twenty-five cents per thousand dollars of assessed valuation. Although park districts are authorized to impose two separate regular property tax levies, the levies shall be considered to be a single levy for purposes of the ((one hundred six percent)) limitation provided for in chapter 84.55 RCW.

      The board is hereby authorized to levy a general tax in excess of its regular property tax levy or levies when authorized so to do at a special election conducted in accordance with and subject to all the requirements of the Constitution and laws of the state now in force or hereafter enacted governing the limitation of tax levies. The board is hereby authorized to call a special election for the purpose of submitting to the qualified voters of the park district a proposition to levy a tax in excess of the seventy-five cents per thousand dollars of assessed value herein specifically authorized. The manner of submitting any such proposition, of certifying the same, and of giving or publishing notice thereof, shall be as provided by law for the submission of propositions by cities or towns.

      The board shall include in its general tax levy for each year a sufficient sum to pay the interest on all outstanding bonds and may include a sufficient amount to create a sinking fund for the redemption of all outstanding bonds. The levy shall be certified to the proper county officials for collection the same as other general taxes and when collected, the general tax shall be placed in a separate fund in the office of the county treasurer to be known as the "metropolitan park district fund" and paid out on warrants.

      Sec. 4. RCW 70.44.060 and 1990 c 234 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

      All public hospital districts organized under the provisions of this chapter shall have power:

      (1) To make a survey of existing hospital and other health care facilities within and without such district.

      (2) To construct, condemn and purchase, purchase, acquire, lease, add to, maintain, operate, develop and regulate, sell and convey all lands, property, property rights, equipment, hospital and other health care facilities and systems for the maintenance of hospitals, buildings, structures, and any and all other facilities, and to exercise the right of eminent domain to effectuate the foregoing purposes or for the acquisition and damaging of the same or property of any kind appurtenant thereto, and such right of eminent domain shall be exercised and instituted pursuant to a resolution of the commission and conducted in the same manner and by the same procedure as in or may be provided by law for the exercise of the power of eminent domain by incorporated cities and towns of the state of Washington in the acquisition of property rights: PROVIDED, That no public hospital district shall have the right of eminent domain and the power of condemnation against any health care facility.

      (3) To lease existing hospital and other health care facilities and equipment and/or other property used in connection therewith, including ambulances, and to pay such rental therefor as the commissioners shall deem proper; to provide hospital and other health care services for residents of said district by facilities located outside the boundaries of said district, by contract or in any other manner said commissioners may deem expedient or necessary under the existing conditions; and said hospital district shall have the power to contract with other communities, corporations, or individuals for the services provided by said hospital district; and they may further receive in said hospitals and other health care facilities and furnish proper and adequate services to all persons not residents of said district at such reasonable and fair compensation as may be considered proper: PROVIDED, That it must at all times make adequate provision for the needs of the district and residents of said district shall have prior rights to the available hospital and other health care facilities of said district, at rates set by the district commissioners.

      (4) For the purpose aforesaid, it shall be lawful for any district so organized to take, condemn and purchase, lease, or acquire, any and all property, and property rights, including state and county lands, for any of the purposes aforesaid, and any and all other facilities necessary or convenient, and in connection with the construction, maintenance, and operation of any such hospitals and other health care facilities, subject, however, to the applicable limitations provided in subsection (2) of this section.

      (5) To contract indebtedness or borrow money for corporate purposes on the credit of the corporation or the revenues of the hospitals thereof, and the revenues of any other facilities or services that the district is or hereafter may be authorized by law to provide, and to issue and sell: (a) Revenue bonds, revenue warrants, or other revenue obligations therefor payable solely out of a special fund or funds into which the district may pledge such amount of the revenues of the hospitals thereof, and the revenues of any other facilities or services that the district is or hereafter may be authorized by law to provide, to pay the same as the commissioners of the district may determine, such revenue bonds, warrants, or other obligations to be issued and sold in the same manner and subject to the same provisions as provided for the issuance of revenue bonds, warrants, or other obligations by cities or towns under the Municipal Revenue Bond Act, chapter 35.41 RCW, as may hereafter be amended; (b) general obligation bonds therefor in the manner and form as provided in RCW 70.44.110 and 70.44.130, as may hereafter be amended; or (c) interest-bearing warrants to be drawn on a fund pending deposit in such fund of money sufficient to redeem such warrants and to be issued and paid in such manner and upon such terms and conditions as the board of commissioners may deem to be in the best interest of the district; and to assign or sell hospital accounts receivable, and accounts receivable for the use of other facilities or services that the district is or hereafter may be authorized by law to provide, for collection with or without recourse. General obligation bonds shall be issued and sold in accordance with chapter 39.46 RCW. Revenue bonds, revenue warrants, or other revenue obligations may be issued and sold in accordance with chapter 39.46 RCW.

      (6) To raise revenue by the levy of an annual tax on all taxable property within such public hospital district not to exceed fifty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value, and an additional annual tax on all taxable property within such public hospital district not to exceed twenty-five cents per thousand dollars of assessed value, or such further amount as has been or shall be authorized by a vote of the people. Although public hospital districts are authorized to impose two separate regular property tax levies, the levies shall be considered to be a single levy for purposes of the ((one hundred six percent)) limitation provided for in chapter 84.55 RCW. Public hospital districts are authorized to levy such a general tax in excess of their regular property taxes when authorized so to do at a special election conducted in accordance with and subject to all of the requirements of the Constitution and the laws of the state of Washington now in force or hereafter enacted governing the limitation of tax levies. The said board of district commissioners is authorized and empowered to call a special election for the purpose of submitting to the qualified voters of the hospital district a proposition or propositions to levy taxes in excess of its regular property taxes. The superintendent shall prepare a proposed budget of the contemplated financial transactions for the ensuing year and file the same in the records of the commission on or before the first Monday in September. Notice of the filing of said proposed budget and the date and place of hearing on the same shall be published for at least two consecutive weeks in a newspaper printed and of general circulation in said county. On the first Monday in October the commission shall hold a public hearing on said proposed budget at which any taxpayer may appear and be heard against the whole or any part of the proposed budget. Upon the conclusion of said hearing, the commission shall, by resolution, adopt the budget as finally determined and fix the final amount of expenditures for the ensuing year. Taxes levied by the commission shall be certified to and collected by the proper county officer of the county in which such public hospital district is located in the same manner as is or may be provided by law for the certification and collection of port district taxes. The commission is authorized, prior to the receipt of taxes raised by levy, to borrow money or issue warrants of the district in anticipation of the revenue to be derived by such district from the levy of taxes for the purpose of such district, and such warrants shall be redeemed from the first money available from such taxes when collected, and such warrants shall not exceed the anticipated revenues of one year, and shall bear interest at a rate or rates as authorized by the commission.

      (7) To enter into any contract with the United States government or any state, municipality, or other hospital district, or any department of those governing bodies, for carrying out any of the powers authorized by this chapter.

      (8) To sue and be sued in any court of competent jurisdiction: PROVIDED, That all suits against the public hospital district shall be brought in the county in which the public hospital district is located.

      (9) To pay actual necessary travel expenses and living expenses incurred while in travel status for (a) qualified physicians who are candidates for medical staff positions, and (b) other qualified persons who are candidates for superintendent or other managerial and technical positions, when the district finds that hospitals or other health care facilities owned and operated by it are not adequately staffed and determines that personal interviews with said candidates to be held in the district are necessary or desirable for the adequate staffing of said facilities.

      (10) To make contracts, employ superintendents, attorneys, and other technical or professional assistants and all other employees; to make contracts with private or public institutions for employee retirement programs; to print and publish information or literature; and to do all other things necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

      Sec. 5. RCW 84.08.115 and 1991 c 218 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) The department shall prepare a clear and succinct explanation of the property tax system, including but not limited to:

      (a) The standard of true and fair value as the basis of the property tax.

      (b) How the assessed value for particular parcels is determined.

      (c) The procedures and timing of the assessment process.

      (d) How district levy rates are determined, including the ((one hundred six percent)) limit under chapter 84.55 RCW.

      (e) How the composite tax rate is determined.

      (f) How the amount of tax is calculated.

      (g) How a taxpayer may appeal an assessment, and what issues are appropriate as a basis of appeal.

      (h) A summary of tax exemption and relief programs, along with the eligibility standards and application processes.

      (2) Each county assessor shall provide copies of the explanation to taxpayers on request, free of charge. Each revaluation notice shall include information regarding the availability of the explanation."

      Renumber the remaining sections consecutively and correct any internal references accordingly.


POINT OF ORDER


      Senator Loveland: "I call for a point of order. The amendment by Senators Cantu and Oke should be scoped. The underlying bill, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 relates only to the state levy and does not have anything to do with local government regular levies being artificially scaled back. The Cantu/Oke amendment places a lid on all regular levies. This is beyond my underlying bill."

      Further debate ensued.

      There being no objection, the President deferred further consideration of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000.


      There being no objection, the Senate resumed consideration of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5875 and the pending amendment by Senators Morton, Snyder, Hargrove and Oke on page 3, line 20, deferred March 10, 1995.


RULING BY THE PRESIDENT


      President Pritchard: "In ruling upon the point of order raised by Senator Fraser, the President finds that Substitute Senate Bill No. 5875 is a measure which provides a process for interagency agreements among local, state and federal governments for the operation of wetland mitigation banks and establishes issues which must be considered in the agreements.

      "The amendment proposed by Senators Morton, Snyder, Hargrove and Oke on page 3, line 20, would prohibit the agencies involved in interagency agreements on wetland mitigation banks from using a delineation process in the agreement which is more stringent than that adopted by the Army Corps of Engineers.

      "The President, therefore, finds that the proposed amendment does not change the scope and object of the bill and the point of order is not well taken."


      The amendment by Senators Morton, Snyder, Hargrove and Oke on page 3, line 20, to Substitute Senate Bill No. 5875 was ruled in order.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senators Morton, Snyder, Hargrove and Oke on page 3, line 20, to Substitute Senate Bill No. 5875.

      Debate ensued.

      Senator McCaslin demanded a roll call and the demand was sustained.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the adoption of the amendment by Senators Morton, Snyder, Hargrove and Oke on page 3, line 20, to Substitute Senate Bill No. 5875.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll and the amendment was adopted by the following vote: Yeas, 29; Nays, 19; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Finkbeiner, Hale, Hargrove, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Long, Loveland, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Prince, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Snyder, Strannigan, Swecker, West, Winsley and Wood - 29.

      Voting nay: Senators Anderson, C., Drew, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Haugen, Kohl, McAuliffe, Pelz, Prentice, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Sheldon, Smith, Spanel, Sutherland and Wojahn - 19.

      Excused: Senator Moyer - 1.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Fraser, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5875 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5875.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substiute Senate Bill No. 5875 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 48.

      Excused: Senator Moyer - 1.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5875, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5282, by Senators Fraser and Newhouse (by request of Department of Revenue)

 

Modifying department of revenue tax information disclosure regulations.


      The bill was read the second time.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Smith, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 5282 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 5282.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 5282 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 48.

      Excused: Senator Moyer - 1.

      SENATE BILL NO. 5282, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5336, by Senators McAuliffe, Moyer, Fairley and Winsley (by request of Department of Health)

 

Regulating food industry safety.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Quigley, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5336 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5336 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      Debate ensued.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Quigley, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5336 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5336.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5336 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 43; Nays, 4; Absent, 1; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 43.

      Voting nay: Senators Hargrove, Haugen, Owen and Snyder - 4.

      Absent: Senator Newhouse - 1.

      Excused: Senator Moyer - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5336, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5680, by Senators Hargrove, Long, Franklin, Kohl and Winsley (by request of Department of Social and Health Services)

 

Modifying licensing enforcement for child care agencies.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Hargrove, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5680 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5680 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5680 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Cal Anderson, Senators Fairley and Wojahn were excused.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5680.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5680 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 45; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 3.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley and Wood - 45.

      Absent: Senator Pelz - 1.

      Excused: Senators Fairley, Moyer and Wojahn - 3.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5680, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING



      SENATE BILL NO. 5084, by Senators Drew, Prince, Haugen, Wood, Fairley, Franklin, Deccio and Sheldon (by request of Department of General Administration)

 

Reducing commute trips.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Owen, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5084 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5084 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Drew, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5084 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


POINT OF INQUIRY


      Senator Prentice: "Senator Drew, does Substitute Senate Bill No. 5084 prohibit labor/management negotiations on commute trip reduction issues, including parking fees at individual state agencies?"

      Senator Drew: "No, nothing in Substitute Senate Bill No. 5084, including Section 4, is intended to change or supersede any labor/management rights and obligations under existing law."

      Senator Prentice: "Thank you."

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5084.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5084 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 44; Nays, 1; Absent, 1; Excused, 3.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West and Winsley - 44.

      Voting nay: Senator Anderson, A. - 1.

      Absent: Senator Wood - 1.

      Excused: Senators Fairley, Moyer and Wojahn - 3.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5084, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING



      SENATE BILL NO. 5685, by Senators Long, Haugen, Wood, Kohl, Prince, Fraser, Owen, Schow, Sellar, Heavey, Rasmussen, Winsley and Sheldon

 

Updating regulation of salvaged vehicles.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Owen, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5685 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5685 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Haugen, the following amendment by Senators Owen and Haugen was adopted:

      On page 12, after line 9, insert the following:

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 22. (1) The legislature recognizes that currently the state patrol inspects rebuilt vehicles for stolen parts. However, they are not authorized to perform complete safety inspections.

      (2) The state patrol shall assemble a study group and complete a study, to be submitted to the legislative transportation committee no later than January 1, 1996, on the feasibility of implementing safety inspections for vehicles that are rebuilt after surrender of the certificate of ownership to the department of licensing under RCW 46.12.070 due to the vehicle's destruction or declaration as a total loss. The study shall include, but is not limited to:

      (a) An examination of safety inspection systems in other states;

      (b) A determination of how a safety inspection program might be implemented in Washington state;

      (c) An analysis of the cost of conducting a safety inspection and who should be responsible for bearing those costs; and

      (d) An evaluation of whether state agencies or private business might most effectively and efficiently conduct safety inspections.

      (3) The study group prescribed in subsection (2) of this section must include representatives of the state patrol, the department of licensing, the Washington traffic safety commission, the insurance industry, the autobody industry, and other appropriate groups.

      (4) Section 24 of this act and RCW 46.12.050 require notification on the certificates of ownership and registration as to whether a vehicle has previously been destroyed or declared a total loss. The department of licensing, in consultation with the study group members prescribed in subsection (3) of this section, shall study the feasibility of expanding the notification requirement to apply to all vehicles, regardless of age. The study group shall also develop a recommendation regarding the feasibility of differentiating on the certificates of ownership and registration whether the vehicle has sustained cosmetic damage or structural damage. The department shall report its findings to the legislative transportation committee no later than January 1, 1996.

      Sec. 23. RCW 46.12.030 and 1990 c 238 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

      The application for certificate of ownership shall be upon a blank form to be furnished by the department and shall contain:

      (1) A full description of the vehicle, which shall contain the proper vehicle identification number, the number of miles indicated on the odometer at the time of delivery of the vehicle, and any distinguishing marks of identification;

      (2) The name and address of the person who is to be the registered owner of the vehicle and, if the vehicle is subject to a security interest, the name and address of the secured party;

      (3) Such other information as the department may require. The department may in any instance, in addition to the information required on the application, require additional information and a physical examination of the vehicle or of any class of vehicles, or either. A physical examination of the vehicle is mandatory if it previously was registered in any other state or country or if it has been rebuilt after surrender of the certificate of ownership to the department under RCW 46.12.070 due to the vehicle's destruction or declaration as a total loss. The inspection must verify that the vehicle identification number is genuine and agrees with the number shown on the foreign title and registration certificate. If the vehicle is from a jurisdiction that does not issue titles, the inspection must verify that the vehicle identification number is genuine and agrees with the number shown on the registration certificate. The inspection must also confirm that the license plates on the vehicle are those assigned to the vehicle by the jurisdiction in which the vehicle was previously licensed. The inspection must be made by a member of the Washington state patrol or other person authorized by the department to make such inspections.

       The application shall be subscribed by the registered owner and be sworn to by that applicant in the manner described by RCW 9A.72.085. The department shall retain the application in either the original, computer, or photostatic form.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 24. A new section is added to chapter 46.12 RCW to read as follows:

      (1) Effective January 1, 1997, the department shall issue a unique certificate of ownership and certificate of license registration, as required by chapter 46.16 RCW, for vehicles less than four years old that are rebuilt after surrender of the certificate of ownership to the department under RCW 46.12.070 due to the vehicle's destruction or declaration as a total loss. Each certificate shall conspicuously display across its front, a word indicating that the vehicle was rebuilt.

      (2) Beginning January 1, 1997, upon inspection of a vehicle that has been rebuilt under RCW 46.12.030, the state patrol shall securely affix or inscribe a marking at the driver's door latch indicating that the vehicle has previously been destroyed or declared a total loss.

      (3) It is unlawful for a person to remove the marking prescribed in subsection (2) of this section. Upon conviction, the person is guilty of a class C felony.

      (4) The department may adopt rules as necessary to implement this section.

      Sec. 25. RCW 46.63.020 and 1994 c 275 s 33 and 1994 c 141 s 2 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:

      Failure to perform any act required or the performance of any act prohibited by this title or an equivalent administrative regulation or local law, ordinance, regulation, or resolution relating to traffic including parking, standing, stopping, and pedestrian offenses, is designated as a traffic infraction and may not be classified as a criminal offense, except for an offense contained in the following provisions of this title or a violation of an equivalent administrative regulation or local law, ordinance, regulation, or resolution:

      (1) RCW 46.09.120(2) relating to the operation of a nonhighway vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or a controlled substance;

      (2) RCW 46.09.130 relating to operation of nonhighway vehicles;

      (3) RCW 46.10.090(2) relating to the operation of a snowmobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or narcotics or habit-forming drugs or in a manner endangering the person of another;

      (4) RCW 46.10.130 relating to the operation of snowmobiles;

      (5) Chapter 46.12 RCW relating to certificates of ownership and registration and markings indicating that a vehicle has been destroyed or declared a total loss;

      (6) RCW 46.16.010 relating to initial registration of motor vehicles;

      (7) RCW 46.16.011 relating to permitting unauthorized persons to drive;

      (8) RCW 46.16.160 relating to vehicle trip permits;

      (9) RCW 46.16.381 (6) or (9) relating to unauthorized use or acquisition of a special placard or license plate for disabled persons' parking;

      (10) RCW 46.20.021 relating to driving without a valid driver's license;

      (11) RCW 46.20.336 relating to the unlawful possession and use of a driver's license;

      (12) RCW 46.20.342 relating to driving with a suspended or revoked license or status;

      (13) RCW 46.20.410 relating to the violation of restrictions of an occupational driver's license;

      (14) RCW 46.20.420 relating to the operation of a motor vehicle with a suspended or revoked license;

      (15) RCW 46.20.750 relating to assisting another person to start a vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device;

      (16) RCW 46.25.170 relating to commercial driver's licenses;

      (17) Chapter 46.29 RCW relating to financial responsibility;

      (18) RCW 46.30.040 relating to providing false evidence of financial responsibility;

      (19) RCW 46.37.435 relating to wrongful installation of sunscreening material;

      (20) RCW 46.44.180 relating to operation of mobile home pilot vehicles;

      (21) RCW 46.48.175 relating to the transportation of dangerous articles;

      (22) RCW 46.52.010 relating to duty on striking an unattended car or other property;

      (23) RCW 46.52.020 relating to duty in case of injury to or death of a person or damage to an attended vehicle;

      (24) RCW 46.52.090 relating to reports by repairmen, storagemen, and appraisers;

      (25) RCW 46.52.100 relating to driving under the influence of liquor or drugs;

      (26) RCW 46.52.130 relating to confidentiality of the driving record to be furnished to an insurance company, an employer, and an alcohol/drug assessment or treatment agency;

      (27) RCW 46.55.020 relating to engaging in the activities of a registered tow truck operator without a registration certificate;

      (28) RCW 46.55.035 relating to prohibited practices by tow truck operators;

      (29) RCW 46.61.015 relating to obedience to police officers, flagmen, or fire fighters;

      (30) RCW 46.61.020 relating to refusal to give information to or cooperate with an officer;

      (31) RCW 46.61.022 relating to failure to stop and give identification to an officer;

      (32) RCW 46.61.024 relating to attempting to elude pursuing police vehicles;

      (33) RCW 46.61.500 relating to reckless driving;

      (34) RCW 46.61.502, 46.61.504, 46.61.5051, 46.61.5052, and 46.61.5053 relating to persons under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs;

      (35) RCW 46.61.520 relating to vehicular homicide by motor vehicle;

      (36) RCW 46.61.522 relating to vehicular assault;

      (37) RCW 46.61.525 relating to negligent driving;

      (38) RCW 46.61.527(4) relating to reckless endangerment of roadway workers;

      (39) RCW 46.61.530 relating to racing of vehicles on highways;

      (40) RCW 46.61.685 relating to leaving children in an unattended vehicle with the motor running;

      (41) RCW 46.64.010 relating to unlawful cancellation of or attempt to cancel a traffic citation;

      (42) RCW 46.64.048 relating to attempting, aiding, abetting, coercing, and committing crimes;

      (43) Chapter 46.65 RCW relating to habitual traffic offenders;

      (44) Chapter 46.70 RCW relating to unfair motor vehicle business practices, except where that chapter provides for the assessment of monetary penalties of a civil nature;

      (45) Chapter 46.72 RCW relating to the transportation of passengers in for hire vehicles;

      (46) Chapter 46.80 RCW relating to motor vehicle wreckers;

      (47) Chapter 46.82 RCW relating to driver's training schools;

      (48) RCW 46.87.260 relating to alteration or forgery of a cab card, letter of authority, or other temporary authority issued under chapter 46.87 RCW;

      (49) RCW 46.87.290 relating to operation of an unregistered or unlicensed vehicle under chapter 46.87 RCW.

      Sec. 26. RCW 46.70.180 and 1994 c 284 s 13 are each amended to read as follows:

      Each of the following acts or practices is unlawful:

      (1) To cause or permit to be advertised, printed, displayed, published, distributed, broadcasted, televised, or disseminated in any manner whatsoever, any statement or representation with regard to the sale or financing of a vehicle which is false, deceptive, or misleading, including but not limited to the following:

      (a) That no down payment is required in connection with the sale of a vehicle when a down payment is in fact required, or that a vehicle may be purchased for a smaller down payment than is actually required;

      (b) That a certain percentage of the sale price of a vehicle may be financed when such financing is not offered in a single document evidencing the entire security transaction;

      (c) That a certain percentage is the amount of the service charge to be charged for financing, without stating whether this percentage charge is a monthly amount or an amount to be charged per year;

      (d) That a new vehicle will be sold for a certain amount above or below cost without computing cost as the exact amount of the factory invoice on the specific vehicle to be sold;

      (e) That a vehicle will be sold upon a monthly payment of a certain amount, without including in the statement the number of payments of that same amount which are required to liquidate the unpaid purchase price.

      (2) To incorporate within the terms of any purchase and sale agreement any statement or representation with regard to the sale or financing of a vehicle which is false, deceptive, or misleading, including but not limited to terms that include as an added cost to the selling price of a vehicle an amount for licensing or transfer of title of that vehicle which is not actually due to the state, unless such amount has in fact been paid by the dealer prior to such sale.

      (3) To set up, promote, or aid in the promotion of a plan by which vehicles are to be sold to a person for a consideration and upon further consideration that the purchaser agrees to secure one or more persons to participate in the plan by respectively making a similar purchase and in turn agreeing to secure one or more persons likewise to join in said plan, each purchaser being given the right to secure money, credits, goods, or something of value, depending upon the number of persons joining the plan.

      (4) To commit, allow, or ratify any act of "bushing" which is defined as follows: Taking from a prospective buyer of a vehicle a written order or offer to purchase, or a contract document signed by the buyer, which:

      (a) Is subject to the dealer's, or his or her authorized representative's future acceptance, and the dealer fails or refuses within forty-eight hours, exclusive of Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, and prior to any further negotiations with said buyer, to deliver to the buyer either the dealer's signed acceptance or all copies of the order, offer, or contract document together with any initial payment or security made or given by the buyer, including but not limited to money, check, promissory note, vehicle keys, a trade-in, or certificate of title to a trade-in; or

      (b) Permits the dealer to renegotiate a dollar amount specified as trade-in allowance on a vehicle delivered or to be delivered by the buyer as part of the purchase price, for any reason except:

      (i) Failure to disclose that the vehicle's certificate of ownership has been branded for any reason, including, but not limited to, status as a rebuilt vehicle as provided in RCW 46.12.050 and section 24 of this act; and

      (ii) Substantial physical damage or latent mechanical defect occurring before the dealer took possession of the vehicle and which could not have been reasonably discoverable at the time of the taking of the order, offer, or contract; or

      (c) Fails to comply with the obligation of any written warranty or guarantee given by the dealer requiring the furnishing of services or repairs within a reasonable time.

      (5) To commit any offense relating to odometers, as such offenses are defined in RCW 46.37.540, 46.37.550, 46.37.560, and 46.37.570. A violation of this subsection is a class C felony punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW.

      (6) For any vehicle dealer or vehicle salesman to refuse to furnish, upon request of a prospective purchaser, the name and address of the previous registered owner of any used vehicle offered for sale.

      (7) To commit any other offense under RCW 46.37.423, 46.37.424, or 46.37.425.

      (8) To commit any offense relating to a dealer's temporary license permit, including but not limited to failure to properly complete each such permit, or the issuance of more than one such permit on any one vehicle.

      (9) For a dealer, salesman, or mobile home manufacturer, having taken an instrument or cash "on deposit" from a purchaser prior to the delivery of the bargained-for vehicle, to commingle the "on deposit" funds with assets of the dealer, salesman, or mobile home manufacturer instead of holding the "on deposit" funds as trustee in a separate trust account until the purchaser has taken delivery of the bargained-for vehicle. Delivery of a manufactured home shall be deemed to occur in accordance with RCW 46.70.135(5). Failure, immediately upon receipt, to endorse "on deposit" instruments to such a trust account, or to set aside "on deposit" cash for deposit in such trust account, and failure to deposit such instruments or cash in such trust account by the close of banking hours on the day following receipt thereof, shall be evidence of intent to commit this unlawful practice: PROVIDED, HOWEVER, That a motor vehicle dealer may keep a separate trust account which equals his or her customary total customer deposits for vehicles for future delivery. For purposes of this section, "on deposit" funds received from a purchaser of a manufactured home means those funds that a seller requires a purchaser to advance before ordering the manufactured home, but does not include any loan proceeds or moneys that might have been paid on an installment contract.

      (10) For a dealer or manufacturer to fail to comply with the obligations of any written warranty or guarantee given by the dealer or manufacturer requiring the furnishing of goods and services or repairs within a reasonable period of time, or to fail to furnish to a purchaser, all parts which attach to the manufactured unit including but not limited to the undercarriage, and all items specified in the terms of a sales agreement signed by the seller and buyer.

      (11) For a vehicle dealer to pay to or receive from any person, firm, partnership, association, or corporation acting, either directly or through a subsidiary, as a buyer's agent for consumers, any compensation, fee, gratuity, or reward in connection with the purchase or sale of a new motor vehicle.

      (12) For a buyer's agent acting directly or through a subsidiary to pay to or to receive from any motor vehicle dealer any compensation, fee, gratuity, or reward in connection with the purchase or sale of a new motor vehicle.

      (13) For a buyer's agent to arrange for or to negotiate the purchase, or both, of a new motor vehicle through an out-of-state dealer without disclosing in writing to the customer that the new vehicle would not be subject to chapter 19.118 RCW.

      (14) Being a manufacturer, other than a motorcycle manufacturer governed by chapter 46.94 RCW, to:

      (a) Coerce or attempt to coerce any vehicle dealer to order or accept delivery of any vehicle or vehicles, parts or accessories, or any other commodities which have not been voluntarily ordered by the vehicle dealer: PROVIDED, That recommendation, endorsement, exposition, persuasion, urging, or argument are not deemed to constitute coercion;

      (b) Cancel or fail to renew the franchise or selling agreement of any vehicle dealer doing business in this state without fairly compensating the dealer at a fair going business value for his or her capital investment which shall include but not be limited to tools, equipment, and parts inventory possessed by the dealer on the day he or she is notified of such cancellation or termination and which are still within the dealer's possession on the day the cancellation or termination is effective, if: (i) The capital investment has been entered into with reasonable and prudent business judgment for the purpose of fulfilling the franchise; and (ii) the cancellation or nonrenewal was not done in good faith. Good faith is defined as the duty of each party to any franchise to act in a fair and equitable manner towards each other, so as to guarantee one party freedom from coercion, intimidation, or threats of coercion or intimidation from the other party: PROVIDED, That recommendation, endorsement, exposition, persuasion, urging, or argument are not deemed to constitute a lack of good faith.

      (c) Encourage, aid, abet, or teach a vehicle dealer to sell vehicles through any false, deceptive, or misleading sales or financing practices including but not limited to those practices declared unlawful in this section;

      (d) Coerce or attempt to coerce a vehicle dealer to engage in any practice forbidden in this section by either threats of actual cancellation or failure to renew the dealer's franchise agreement;

      (e) Refuse to deliver any vehicle publicly advertised for immediate delivery to any duly licensed vehicle dealer having a franchise or contractual agreement for the retail sale of new and unused vehicles sold or distributed by such manufacturer within sixty days after such dealer's order has been received in writing unless caused by inability to deliver because of shortage or curtailment of material, labor, transportation, or utility services, or by any labor or production difficulty, or by any cause beyond the reasonable control of the manufacturer;

      (f) To provide under the terms of any warranty that a purchaser of any new or unused vehicle that has been sold, distributed for sale, or transferred into this state for resale by the vehicle manufacturer may only make any warranty claim on any item included as an integral part of the vehicle against the manufacturer of that item.

      Nothing in this section may be construed to impair the obligations of a contract or to prevent a manufacturer, distributor, representative, or any other person, whether or not licensed under this chapter, from requiring performance of a written contract entered into with any licensee hereunder, nor does the requirement of such performance constitute a violation of any of the provisions of this section if any such contract or the terms thereof requiring performance, have been freely entered into and executed between the contracting parties. This paragraph and subsection (14)(b) of this section do not apply to new motor vehicle manufacturers governed by chapter 46.96 RCW.

      (15) Unlawful transfer of an ownership interest in a motor vehicle as defined in RCW 19.116.050."

      Renumber the section following consecutively.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Owen, the following title amendment was adopted:

      On line 4 of the title, after "46.80.170," strike the remainder of the title and insert "46.80.900, 46.12.030, and 46.70.180; reenacting and amending RCW 46.63.020; adding new sections to chapter 46.12 RCW; adding new sections to chapter 46.80 RCW; creating a new section; repealing RCW 46.80.055; and prescribing penalties."

      On motion of Senator Owen, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5685 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Ann Anderson, Senator Wood was excused.

      On motion of Senator Loveland, Senator Prentice was excused.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5685.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5685 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 45; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 4.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley and Wojahn - 45.

      Excused: Senators Fairley, Moyer, Prentice and Wood - 4.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5685, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


      President Pro Tempore Wojahn assumed the Chair.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 6002, by Senators Bauer, Wood, Rinehart and Kohl (by request of State Board for Community and Technical Colleges)

 

Changing community and technical college tuition refund and fee cancellation provisions.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Bauer, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6002 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6002 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Bauer, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6002 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


MOTION



      On motion of Senator Ann Anderson, Senator Roach was excused.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6002.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6002 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 46; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 3.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 46.

      Excused: Senators Moyer, Prentice and Roach - 3.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6002 having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5773, by Senators Pelz, Newhouse and Deccio (by request of Employment Security Department)

 

Revising provision relating to charges against industrial insurance awards.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Pelz, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5773 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5773 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Pelz, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5773 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Ann Anderson, Senator Long was excused.

      On motion of Senator Loveland, Senator Spanel was excused.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5773.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5773 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 43; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 5.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 43.

      Absent: Senator Deccio - 1.

      Excused: Senators Long, Moyer, Prentice, Roach and Spanel - 5.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5773, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5769, by Senator Deccio (by request of Employment Security Department)

 

Revising provision on recovery of unemployment insurance overpayments.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Pelz, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5769 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5769 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Pelz, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5769 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5769.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5769 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 43; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 5.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Loveland, McAuliffe, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 43.

      Absent: Senator McCaslin - 1.

      Excused: Senators Long, Moyer, Prentice, Roach and Spanel - 5.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5769, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5497, by Senators McAuliffe, Fraser, Spanel, C. Anderson and Kohl

 

Assessing a fee and providing recycling incentive payments on automotive motor oil sold.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator McAuliffe, Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5497 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5497 and the second substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator McAuliffe, the rules were suspended, Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5497 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5497.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5497 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 35; Nays, 11; Absent, 0; Excused, 3.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, C., Bauer, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Johnson, Kohl, Loveland, McAuliffe, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 35.

      Voting nay: Senators Anderson, A., Cantu, Hale, Hochstatter, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Palmer, Prince and Schow - 11.

      Excused: Senators Long, Moyer and Roach - 3.

      SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5497, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5990, by Senators Long, Bauer, Cantu, Rinehart, Newhouse, Winsley, Wood, Deccio, Johnson, Finkbeiner, Loveland and Hochstatter

 

Requiring public notice regarding excess compensation.


      The bill was read the second time.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Bauer, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 5990 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 5990.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 5990 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote:

Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 47.

      Excused: Senators Moyer and Roach - 2.

      SENATE BILL NO. 5990, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5747, by Senators Sheldon, Roach, Sellar and Fraser

 

Regulating housing authorities.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Sheldon, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5747 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5747 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Sheldon, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5747 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5747.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5747 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 37; Nays, 10; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Drew, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Sutherland, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 37.

      Voting nay: Senators Cantu, Deccio, Finkbeiner, Hale, Johnson, Morton, Palmer, Schow, Strannigan and Swecker - 10.

      Excused: Senators Moyer and Roach - 2.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5747, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5916, by Senators McAuliffe, Kohl and Pelz

 

Providing for racial equality in school districts.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Pelz, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5916 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5916 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      Senator Johnson moved that the following amendments by Senators Johnson, Hochstatter and McAuliffe be considered simultaneously and be adopted:

      On page 1, after line 3, insert the following:

      "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The legislature recognizes that discrimination and harassment based on race, color, or national origin should not be tolerated in the public schools of the state. The legislature finds that each local school district can make the best decisions about which actions or policies are necessary to prevent discrimination and harassment from occurring in their district."

      Renumber the sections consecutively and correct any internal references accordingly.

      On page 1, after line 14 after "(b)", strike all material down to and including "policy" on page 2, line 11, and insert "School districts may adopt and implement written policies concerning racial harassment. The policies may apply to all school district employees, volunteers, parents, and students, including, but not limited to, conduct between students."

      Renumber the subsections consecutively and correct any internal references accordingly.

      Debate ensued.


POINT OF INQUIRY


      Senator Franklin: "Senator McAuliffe, I appreciate and I think that within our society that there should be no discrimination against race, creed, color, gender. Constitutionally, this is quite true and I think schools are the place where we learn. Do you commit yourself, as one who is a strong supporter of schools--and so am I--that we will work on this issue to see that racial discrimination is wiped out in our schools?"

      Senator McAuliffe: "Thank you, Senator Franklin, and yes, I will commit myself to continue this process. As we see SPI develop their rules, I will be a part of those also, so I thank you for committing me to that."

      Further debate ensued.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendments by Senators Johnson, Hochstatter and McAuliffe on page 1, after line 3, and after line 14, to Substitute Senate Bill No. 5916.

      The motion by Senator Johnson carried and the amendments were adopted.


      President Pritchard assumed the Chair.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Pelz, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5916 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5916.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5916 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 47.

      Excused: Senators Moyer and Roach - 2.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5916, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.



SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5043, by Senators Winsley and Haugen

 

Revising procedures for adoption of codes and statutes by reference by code cities.


      The bill was read the second time.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Winsley, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 5043 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 5043.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 5043 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote:

Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 47.

      Excused: Senators Moyer and Roach - 2.

      SENATE BILL NO. 5043, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


      There being no objection, the Senate resumed consideration of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 and the pending amendment by Senators Cantu and Oke on page 1, after line 5, deferred earlier today.


RULING BY THE PRESIDENT


      President Pritchard: "In ruling upon the point of order raised by Senator Loveland, the President finds that Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 is a measure which reduces the property tax that would be levied by the state and creates a funding mechanism using funds in excess of the general fund-state expenditure limit established by Initiative 601.

      "The amendment proposed by Senators Cantu and Oke on page 1, after line 5, would change the 106 percent levy limitation on various local taxing districts.

      "The President, therefore, finds that the proposed amendment does change the scope and object of the bill and the point of order is well taken."


      The amendment by Senators Cantu and Oke on page 1, after line 5, to Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 was ruled out of order.


MOTION BY SENATOR WEST


      Senator West: "Thank you, Mr. President I move that the following amendment be adopted:

      Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

      "Sec. 1. RCW 84.48.080 and 1994 c 301 s 43 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) Annually during the months of September and October, the department of revenue shall examine and compare the returns of the assessment of the property in the several counties of the state, and the assessment of the property of railroad and other companies assessed by the department, and proceed to equalize the same, so that each county in the state shall pay its due and just proportion of the taxes for state purposes for such assessment year, according to the ratio the valuation of the property in each county bears to the total valuation of all property in the state.

      First. The department shall classify all property, real and personal, and shall raise and lower the valuation of any class of property in any county to a value that shall be equal, so far as possible, to the true and fair value of such class as of January 1st of the current year for the purpose of ascertaining the just amount of tax due from each county for state purposes. In equalizing personal property as of January 1st of the current year, the department shall use the assessment level of the preceding year. Such classification may be on the basis of types of property, geographical areas, or both. For purposes of this section, for each county that has not provided the department with an assessment return by December 1st, the department shall proceed, using facts and information and in a manner it deems appropriate, to estimate the value of each class of property in the county.

      Second. The department shall keep a full record of its proceedings and the same shall be published annually by the department.

      (2) The department shall levy the state taxes authorized by law((: PROVIDED, That)). The amount levied in any one year for general state purposes shall not exceed the lawful dollar rate on the dollar of the assessed value of the property of the entire state, which assessed value shall be one hundred percent of the true and fair value of such property in money. The amount levied in any year shall be reduced by the amount that general fund--state revenues are forecast to be in excess of the state expenditure limit for the following fiscal year under chapter 43.135 RCW.

      The department shall apportion the amount of tax for state purposes levied by the department, among the several counties, in proportion to the valuation of the taxable property of the county for the year as equalized by the department: PROVIDED, That for purposes of this apportionment, the department shall recompute the previous year's levy and the apportionment thereof to correct for changes and errors in taxable values reported to the department after October 1 of the preceding year and shall adjust the apportioned amount of the current year's state levy for each county by the difference between the apportioned amounts established by the original and revised levy computations for the previous year. For purposes of this section, changes in taxable values mean a final adjustment made by a county board of equalization, the state board of tax appeals, or a court of competent jurisdiction and shall include additions of omitted property, other additions or deletions from the assessment or tax rolls, any assessment return provided by a county to the department subsequent to December 1st, or a change in the indicated ratio of a county. Errors in taxable values mean errors corrected by a final reviewing body.

      In addition to computing a levy under this subsection that is reduced by the amount that general fund--state revenues are forecast to be in excess of the state expenditure limit, the department shall compute a hypothetical levy without regard to the reduction. This hypothetical levy shall also be apportioned among the several counties in proportion to the valuation of the taxable property of the county for the year, as equalized by the department, in the same manner as the actual levy and shall be used by the county assessors for the purpose of recomputing and establishing a consolidated levy under RCW 84.52.010.

      (3) The department shall have authority to adopt rules and regulations to enforce obedience to its orders in all matters in relation to the returns of county assessments, the equalization of values, and the apportionment of the state levy by the department.

      (4) After the completion of the duties ((hereinabove)) prescribed in this section, the director of the department shall certify the record of the proceedings of the department under this section, the tax levies made for state purposes and the apportionment thereof among the counties, and the certification shall be available for public inspection.

      Sec. 2. RCW 84.52.010 and 1994 c 124 s 36 are each amended to read as follows:

      Except as is permitted under RCW 84.55.050, all taxes shall be levied or voted in specific amounts.

      The rate percent of all taxes for state and county purposes, and purposes of taxing districts coextensive with the county, shall be determined, calculated and fixed by the county assessors of the respective counties, within the limitations provided by law, upon the assessed valuation of the property of the county, as shown by the completed tax rolls of the county, and the rate percent of all taxes levied for purposes of taxing districts within any county shall be determined, calculated and fixed by the county assessors of the respective counties, within the limitations provided by law, upon the assessed valuation of the property of the taxing districts respectively.

      When a county assessor finds that the aggregate rate of tax levy on any property, that is subject to the limitations set forth in RCW 84.52.043 or 84.52.050, ((as now or hereafter amended,)) exceeds the limitations provided in either of these sections, the assessor shall recompute and establish a consolidated levy in the following manner:

      (1) The full certified rates of tax levy for state, county, county road district, and city or town purposes shall be extended on the tax rolls in amounts not exceeding the limitations established by law; however any state levy shall take precedence over all other levies and shall not be reduced for any purpose other than that required by RCW 84.55.010; however, if as a result of the levies imposed under RCW 84.52.069, 84.34.230, and 84.52.105, the combined rates of regular property tax levies exceed one percent of the true and fair value of any property, then the levies imposed under RCW 84.34.230 and 84.52.105, and any portion of the levy imposed under RCW 84.52.069 that is in excess of thirty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value, shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated until the combined rates of regular property tax levies no longer exceed one percent of the true and fair value of any property; and

      (2) The certified rates of tax levy subject to these limitations by all junior taxing districts imposing taxes on such property shall be reduced or eliminated as follows to bring the consolidated levy of taxes on such property within the provisions of these limitations:

      (a) First, the certified property tax levy rates of those junior taxing districts authorized under RCW 36.68.525, 36.69.145, and 67.38.130 shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;

      (b) Second, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates of flood control zone districts shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;

      (c) Third, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates of all other junior taxing districts, other than fire protection districts, library districts, the first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levies for metropolitan park districts, and the first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levies for public hospital districts, shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;

      (d) Fourth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates authorized to fire protection districts under RCW 52.16.140 and 52.16.160 shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated; and

      (e) Fifth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates authorized for fire protection districts under RCW 52.16.130, library districts, metropolitan park districts under their first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levy, and public hospital districts under their first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levy, shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated.

      In determining whether the aggregate rate of tax levy on any property, that is subject to the limitations set forth in RCW 84.52.050, exceeds the limitations provided in that section, the assessor shall use the hypothetical state levy, as apportioned to the county under RCW 84.48.080, that was computed under RCW 84.48.080 without regard to the reduction in the levy for the amount that general fund--state revenues are forecast to be in excess of the state expenditure limit.

      Sec. 3. RCW 84.55.092 and 1988 c 274 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

      The regular property tax levy for each taxing district ((other than the state)) may be set at the amount which would be allowed otherwise under this chapter if the regular property tax levy for the district for taxes due in prior years beginning with 1986 had been set at the full amount allowed under this chapter.

      The purpose of this section is to remove the incentive for a taxing district to maintain its tax levy at the maximum level permitted under this chapter, and to protect the future levy capacity of a taxing district that reduces its tax levy below the level that it otherwise could impose under this chapter, by removing the adverse consequences to future levy capacities resulting from such levy reductions.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. This act applies to taxes levied in 1995 for collection in 1996 and thereafter."


FURTHER REMARKS BY SENATOR WEST


      Senator West: "Thank you, Mr. President and members of the Senate. The underlying bill, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 is an excellent bill; it is an excellent concept. The problem is, though, unless we fix it, it is a hollow promise. The underlying bill will amend 601 and it will put a new catch-basin, so to speak, under the revenue. So, the way 601 works now, this cup is like 601. This is all the revenue that the state can spend. Anything that spills over the top of the rim of this cup, the state can't spend, so the sponsor of the bill suggested that anything that spills over the rim--or under 601 currently--anything that spills over the rim, goes into the emergency fund.

      "What the sponsor of this bill suggests is that anything that spills over the rim goes into a new fund called, 'The property tax reduction fund.' Then, as that fund fills up, as we eliminate the property tax, which is three dollars and sixty cents, as we eliminate the state's share of the property tax, once that occurs, then the excess revenue will spill over and fill up the emergency reserve fund. If the emergency reserve fund ever fills up, the money spills off the plate and stays for school construction. The emergency reserve fund would have to be five percent of the value that is cut and that requires us to amend 601.

      "What my amendment says is instead of waiting until the end of the year and seeing how much spills over the top, the Revenue Forecast Council will tell us, as they do every year, how much revenue we expect and how much will go over the top of this cup. Then, the Department of Revenue will have to take the excess out and put it in this property tax before it starts filling up. If you don't do that, what happens is, as it starts filling up, the Legislature will grab a hundred forty seven million dollars and give it away as relief to big business in the form of a sales tax exemption and then the Legislature will reach in and grab one hundred million and give it back to the people in the form of sales tax relief on over-the-counter drugs, and then the Legislature will reach in and grab some more to give back to the B & O tax fund and then they will reach in and grab some more and it never gets to the rim.

      "So, the bill as it stands, the people will have been frauded--a fraud will have been committed on the people, because the revenue will never reach the rim. It will never spill over into this property tax relief. Failure to pass this amendment would cause that to happen. If you pass this amendment, again, the Department of Revenue, the first scoop out of the cup would be into the property tax reduction fund--before you did the one hundred forty seven million for big business--before you did the hundred million for the people through this drug tax relief--before you did the B & O tax relief--before you did the Frank Russell relief--before you did anybody else's tax relief, the people would get their property tax back.

      "I ask you not to perpetuate a hollow property tax relief, but pass this amendment. This amendment will not cost one cent to administer. This amendment will not affect the five hundred million dollar surplus that is projected this year. This amendment will not affect schools negatively. This amendment provides a three hundred and sixty dollar per hundred thousand dollar of assessed dollar reductions when the state tax levies eliminate it. With this amendment, revenue projections indicate that in five years, the property tax levy will be totally eliminated. Without it, it may happen or it may not. With this amendment, it will happen. With this amendment, local government will not be able to backfill. As we lower the state rates, they will not be able to backfill. With this amendment, it only affects the future revenue forecast and this amendment--this amendment--not this bill without this amendment--but this amendment is the only true property tax relief that we will probably see out of this Legislature. Failure to pass this amendment is a hollow promise. It is a--maybe if there is any money left over that gets up as high as the rim, you will get your property tax back.

      "When you go back to your districts and say, 'I voted to give you property tax relief,' and your voters next year get nothing back, they are going to be mad. They are going to be real mad. If you remember what happened to Danny Rostenkowski after he tricked the little old people into passing his OBRA bill back in 1989, that is what is going to happen to us. They are going to chase us down the street, because we are going to go home and say, 'We passed property tax relief,' but guess what, the budget that will come out of the Senate, the budget that will come out of the House, there will be nothing that spills over the rim--absolutely nothing. Even if it does in the budget that comes out of the Senate, I will guarantee you--the Conference Committee Report--there will be not a dime that flows into the property tax relief unless this amendment passes. Thank you very much. Please pass this amendment."


REMARKS BY SENATOR LOVELAND


      Senator Loveland: "Thank you, Mr. President. I rise to oppose the amendment. That was pretty good, Senator West. I like the cup and the saucer; I should have thought of that. However, there are a few things that the striking amendment does not do. One, it does not protect the school levy where Subsitute Senate Bill No. 5000 directs the money to go into an account and be directly credited to schools. Your striker does not take care of that. In addition to that, your striker talks about revenue projections. I came here three years ago and revenue projections said that we were one point two billion dollars short and I voted to increase taxes and I am here today and there is a five hundred million dollar ending-fund balance.

      "I'm not willing to put this body and the body across from us in a position of taking revenue projections and reducing the state's levy when those projections are so inaccurate. It would put the Legislature in a position of guessing how much money was there and if it wasn't there, require the Legislature to cut below the expenditure limit, fund the reduction of the property tax levy and cut other programs in order to do that. I chose a responsible way to have true property tax reduction. Everyone equally shares in the amount of money and I will give you my one, two, three, and I compliment Senator West for using most of my points of what my bill does to explain his. Remember, the striker does not protect schools; it's based on a guess of how much money is going to be there instead of an actual amount. I urge you to vote against the amendment."


REMARKS BY SENATOR BAUER


      Senator Bauer: "Thank you, Mr. President and members of the Senate. I promised the Governor it would be a little short one, but I can remember a couple three weeks ago Senator West criticized us, because we had a formula by which we would require the Legislature or, you know, give the Legislature a little fund to put real money into higher education as opposed to some other gimmick. He criticized the tuition and tied the tuition to the state corporation and to personal income and said, 'Why don't we just put real money into that?' Well, this is the real money he is talking about. You know, you take three or four hundred million out of that cup that he has there, below the lid, and you have taken it out of higher ed. K-12 is pretty well guaranteed its funding by the court decision in seventy-seven, but what do we have left? Well, we have left about half of the biennial budget that we can bargain with and higher education comes into that piece. So, if you are taking that money out underneath that lid of that cup he had there, it is taking it out of higher ed and other programs. You can't have it both ways; you can't spend it and still have it. I think this amendment here has to be taken in light of 'what are you going to do to have to pass a budget and properly fund higher education?' You can't do both."


FURTHER REMARKS BY SENATOR WEST


      Senator West: "Thank you, Mr. President. Well, the good Senator from Vancouver makes my point. He is not going to vote for the final passage, I guess, or if he does, it is because it really doesn't give back any tax money. That is exactly what 5000, without this amendment, is. It is a false hope; it is a false promise. You are telling people that you are going to give back a tax relief, the property tax relief, and you are not. Frankly, the revenue forecast was not wrong. What was wrong was your guesstimate about how much money you would get off your taxes and that was based on fiscal notes, that wasn't the Revenue Forecasting Council. The Revenue Forecasting Council actually is very accurate, you know, and predicts very well. I would ask for your support on the amendment and Mr. President, I would like for this to be a recorded vote."


REMARKS BY PRESIDENT PRITCHARD


      President Pritchard: "All right, do one-sixth of the members sustain the demand? All right, a recorded vote is ordered. The clerk will call the roll on the striking amendment offered by Senator West."


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas, 22; Nays, 25; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Cantu, Deccio, Finkbeiner, Hale, Hochstatter, Johnson, Long, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Palmer, Prince, Schow, Sellar, Strannigan, Swecker, West, Winsley and Wood - 22.

      Voting nay: Senators Anderson, C., Bauer, Drew, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Kohl, Loveland, McAuliffe, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Sutherland and Wojahn - 25.

      Excused: Senators Moyer and Roach - 2.


MOTION BY SENATOR ANN ANDERSON


      Senator Ann Anderson: Thank you, Mr. President, I move that Senator West's remarks be spread upon the Journal."


REPLY BY THE PRESIDENT


      President Pritchard: "All right, hearing no objection. Is it just the remarks on the amendment?"


MOTION BY SENATOR SNYDER


      Senator Snyder: "As long as we are spreading on the Journal, we might as well put all the remarks in the Journal, I think."


REPLY BY THE PRESIDENT


      President Pritchard: "All right, if there is no objection, we will put the remarks in the Journal."


MOTION BY SENATOR LOVELAND


      Senator Loveland: "Thank you, Mr. President. I move that the rules be suspended and Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 be advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill be placed on final passage."


REMARKS BY PRESIDENT PRITCHARD


      President Pritchard: "Senator Loveland moves the bill to third reading and final passage. Hearing no objection, so ordered."


POINT OF ORDER


      Senator West: "A point of order. Would the President rule on whether or not this requires a super majority to pass, because it is an amendment of 601?"


RULING BY THE PRESIDENT


      President Pritchard: "You will have to wait a minute. We'll be just a few minutes. The President's position is that it does affect 601, yes. Do you have any argument with that Senator Loveland? We are all in agreement, just for once. That is amazing. We are in our cups; that is the problem. All right, it takes thirty-three votes to pass the bill."


REMARKS BY SENATOR LOVELAND


      Senator Loveland: "Thank you, Mr. President. I hope that everybody appreciates the fact that I was trying to do something that made a difference for everybody in this state where property taxes were concerned. My background, as most of you know, is I collected property taxes for thirty years. I've heard every excuse; I've seen every sad story; I've seen those who would cheat the system if they possibly could and I believe in the property tax system of this state. People pay taxes based on the value of their property, but we all know that a lot of things have occurred over the years and those occurrences are not within the control of the people who live in their homes or try to run their businesses and that increased property values. You must remember that most people love to have the value of their property increased at all times, except when they have to pay taxes on that value.

      "Having said that, I would like for you to know that I bared my soul, I've provided each one of you a copy of my 1995 property tax statement as an illustration of what Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 would do if all of us have the courage to actually do tax reform in property taxes in this session. If you will look at the tax statement that I provided you, where it says 'state schools,' five hundred and eighty-three dollars and ninety cents is the share when I pay my property taxes that come to the state to pay state schools. If Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 isn't enacted and if the Legislature allows those surpluses, in future years, to be put toward state schools to reduce the state levy and if all of this occurs within five years, that five hundred and eighty-three dollars and ninety cents will be an amount that I will no longer pay in property taxes. That's true property tax reduction.

      "If you will turn to the page that I provided that Senator West quoted from, wherever it was convenient, this law--I promised that I would work, not to create some nightmare out there that no one could understand and had smoke and mirrors. That is exactly what I did; it doesn't cost one penny to administer it. It does not affect the five hundred million dollars that Senator West was talking about. His final arguments on the amendment were talking about dipping into the cup and we were all going to give back all these tax breaks and that's the five hundred million ending-fund balance that only exists once, because, ladies and gentlemen, in July 1, 1995, 601 kicks in. My property tax bill deals with monies above the 601 expenditure limits in the future, so I am not touching the five hundred million dollars.

      "Under Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000, revenue projections do indicate that within five years, the state's property tax levy would be eliminated. I have watched initiatives in the state of California and the state of Oregon absolutely disrupt the ability of those legislative bodies to do the work of the people. This is my attempt at real property tax reform to avoid an initiative that will be unworkable for all of us and those in the future. It does show that each of us pay three hundred and sixty dollars for one hundred thousand dollars of assessed value. I live in a modest home; my house was built in 1951 and has seventeen hundred square feet in it, nothing to sneeze about, and yet I am paying five hundred and eighty-three dollars a year just in state property taxes. I am one of those, too, who am not going to be able to continue to afford to live in my home.

      "Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000, for those of you who have any doubts about what my credentials or my ability to understand the property tax system, all thirty-nine county assessors in this state, helped me put this piece together. They all support it; they all are encouraging and working with the editorial boards at home and talking to groups explaining what this is. This isn't any flash in the pan. They believe in it; they understand it and it is good tax reform.

      "Finally, the other responsible portion of this bill is that I did not want to harm schools. The reason that we developed this special account to take the excess money above 601 and put into a special account was so that it couldn't be trickled off, dribbled off or grabbed off for something other than schools. It goes into the account, it moves over and it buys the levy and it is gone. I submit to you that this is the only true tax reform that we are looking at this legislative session. We will take the property tax that the state collects, eliminate it, it will be a local tax and the state of Washington can continue its business and they will do their business without property tax out of the taxpayers pockets at home. I urge your support of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000. Thank you."


POINT OF INQUIRY


      Senator Sellar: "Senator Loveland, as Vice-Chairman of Ways and Means, is this figured into this year's budget and what would be your estimate of the property tax relief as a result of this year's budget?"

      Senator Loveland: "Is this in the future?"

      Senator Sellar: "If this bill were in effect right now."

      Senator Loveland: "If this bill were to pass, my tax statement is already out, so obviously there is no tax reduction in 1995. The tax reduction would be based on the amount of revenue above the expenditure level in 1996 projected to be seventy-nine million dollars. It could be more; it could be less. Property taxes on the state level will be reduced by whatever amount that is."

      Senator Sellar: "So, you are confident, as a result of this budget, there will be a seventy-nine million dollar property tax relief in 1996?"

      Senator Loveland: "I would guess that it is probably going to be more than that, but, yes, I am confident."

      Senator Sellar: "Thank you."

      Further debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 and the bill failed to receive a two-thirds majority by the following vote: Yeas, 25; Nays, 22; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, C., Bauer, Drew, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Kohl, Loveland, McAuliffe, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Sheldon, Smith, Spanel, Winsley and Wojahn - 25.

      Voting nay: Senators Anderson, A., Cantu, Deccio, Finkbeiner, Hale, Hochstatter, Johnson, Long, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Prince, Schow, Sellar, Snyder, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West and Wood - 22.

      Excused: Senators Moyer and Roach - 2.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5000, having failed to receive the constitutional two-thirds majority, was declared lost.


STATEMENT FOR THE JOURNAL


      Explanation of vote: I changed by vote from 'aye' to 'nay' in order to reconsider the vote by which Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 failed to receive the two-thirds vote that may be required under provisions of Initiative 601.

SENATOR SID SNYDER, District No. 19


MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION


      Senator Snyder moved that the Senate immediately reconsider the vote by which Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 failed to pass the Senate.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the motion by Senator Snyder to immediately reconsider the vote by which Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 failed to pass the Senate.

      The motion by Senator Snyder carried and the Senate will immediately reconsider the vote by which Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 failed to pass the Senate.


MOTION


      Senator West moved that the rules be suspended and Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 be returned to second reading.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the motion by Senator West to return Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 to second reading.

      The motion by Senator West failed and Substitute Senate Bill No. 5000 was held on the third reading calendar.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5962, by Senators Rasmussen and Newhouse

 

Changing dairy products regulations.


      The bill was read the second time.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Rasmussen, the following Committee on Agriculture and Agricultural Trade and Development amendment was adopted:

      On page 1, beginning on line 4, strike all of section 1

      Renumber the remaining section.

      On motion of Senator Rasmussen, the following amendments by Senators Rasmussen, Loveland and Morton was adopted:

      On page 1, after line 3, insert the following:

      "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The department of agriculture shall develop a proposal to impose a civil penalty that would be in lieu of a degrade or summary suspension for violations of the pasteurized milk ordinance. The department shall inquire as to the acceptability of the proposed civil penalty authority with the federal food and drug administration, with regulatory agencies that implement the requirements of the pasteurized milk ordinance in states to which milk produced in Washington state is shipped, and with other public and private organizations that may be affected by the issue. The department shall provide a written report containing its conclusions and recommendations to the house of representatives and senate committees having jurisdiction over milk quality issues by December 15, 1995."

      Renumber the remaining sections and correct internal references.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Rasmussen, the following title amendments were considered simultaneously and were adopted:

      On page 1, line 1 of the title, strike "15.36.111 and"

      On page 1, beginning on line 1, after "products;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 15.36.111 and 15.36.121; and creating a new section."


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Rasmussen, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Senate Bill No. 5962 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 5962.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 5962 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 47.

      Excused: Senators Moyer and Roach - 2.

      ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 5962, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5466, by Senators Smith, Oke, Heavey, Winsley and Franklin

 

Protecting children from sexually explicit films, publications, and devices.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Smith, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5466 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5466 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      Senator Finkbeiner moved that the following amendment by Senators Finkbeiner, Smith and Sutherland be adopted:

      On page 4, after "decisions" on line 19, insert ";

      (3) A provider of on-line services that allows another person access to information stored in an electronic form, such as an electronic bulletin board or the internet. For purposes of this subsection, a "provider" means a person who is in the business of providing access to information stored in an electronic form but who has no ability to control the content of the information and no ability to limit or restrict the viewing or displaying of such information."

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senators Finkbeiner, Smith and Sutherland on page 4, line 19, to Substitute Senate Bill No. 5466.

      The motion by Senator Finkbeiner carried and the amendment was adopted.


MOTION


      Senator Kohl moved that the following amendment by Senators Kohl, Cal Anderson, McAuliffe, Pelz, Fairley, Spanel and Rinehart be adopted:

      On page 4, line 19, after "decisions" insert "; or

      (3) Instructional materials reviewed and recommended by an instructional materials committee and approved by the local school district's board of directors in accordance with RCW 28A.320.230"

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senators Kohl, Cal Anderson, McAuliffe, Pelz, Fairley, Spanel and Rinehart on page 4, line 19, to Substitute Senate Bill No. 5466.

      The motion by Senator Kohl carried and the amendment was adopted.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Kohl, the following amendment by Senators Kohl, Cal Anderson, Fairley, McAuliffe, Rinehart, Spanel and Pelz was adopted:

      On page 4, line 19, after "decisions" insert ";

      (3) The official distribution or use of material by a health care provider, or health agency under the supervision and control, or funded in whole or in part by the state, county, municipality, or other political division of the state;

      (4) Devices designed for contraceptive purposes; or

      (5) The depiction of a female breast feeding an infant"


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Smith, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5466 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5466.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5466 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 41; Nays, 6; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 41.

      Voting nay: Senators Anderson, C., Fairley, Finkbeiner, Kohl, Pelz and Spanel - 6.

      Excused: Senators Moyer and Roach - 2.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5466, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5305, by Senators Heavey, Schow, Sheldon, Oke, Wood and Winsley

 

Using county auditors and subagents by the director of licensing.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Owen, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5305 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5305 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Owen, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5305 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5305.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5305 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 47.

      Excused: Senators Moyer and Roach - 2.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5305, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5735, by Senators West, Winsley, McCaslin, Haugen, Deccio, Hochstatter, Palmer, Roach, Schow, Wood, Hale, Strannigan and Fraser

 

Paying county fees by credit cards.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Haugen, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5735 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5735 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Haugen, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5735 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5735.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5735 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 46; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 46.

      Absent: Senator Franklin - 1.

      Excused: Senators Moyer and Roach - 2.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5735, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5108, by Senators Snyder, Winsley and Palmer

 

Concerning the hunter education training program.


      The bill was read the second time.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Drew, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 5108 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 5108.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 5108 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 44; Nays, 1; Absent, 2; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Finkbeiner, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 44.

      Voting nay: Senator Fairley - 1.

      Absent: Senators Franklin and Quigley - 2.

      Excused: Senators Moyer and Roach - 2.

      SENATE BILL NO. 5108, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5214, by Senators Smith, C. Anderson, Winsley, Haugen and Kohl

 

Making admissible childrens' statements concerning acts of physical abuse.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Smith, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5214 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5214 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Smith, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5214 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5214.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5214 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 47.

      Excused: Senators Moyer and Roach - 2.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5214, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5167, by Senator Smith

 

Allowing service of process on a marital community by serving either spouse.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Smith, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5167 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5167 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Smith, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5167 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5167.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5167 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 46; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 46.

      Absent: Senator McDonald - 1.

      Excused: Senators Moyer and Roach - 2.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5167, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


SECOND READING


      SENATE BILL NO. 5403, by Senators Fraser, A. Anderson, Rasmussen, Prince, Spanel, Morton, Loveland, Swecker, Snyder, Palmer, Owen, Quigley and Roach

 

Establishing the Washington state horse park.


MOTIONS


      On motion of Senator Fraser, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5403 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5403 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Fraser, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5403 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Sheldon, Senator Loveland was excused.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5403.


ROLL CALL


      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5403 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 45; Nays, 1; Absent, 0; Excused, 3.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Anderson, C., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gaspard, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, McAuliffe, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Palmer, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 45.

      Voting nay: Senator McCaslin - 1.

      Excused: Senators Loveland, Moyer and Roach - 3.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5403, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.


MOTION


      At 3:51 p.m., on motion of Senator Spanel, the Senate adjourned until 9:00 a.m., Monday, March 13, 1995.


JOEL PRITCHARD, President of the Senate


MARTY BROWN, Secretary of the Senate