NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 44.68 RCW to read as follows:

      The legislature and legislative agencies through the joint legislative systems committee, shall:

      (1)Continue to plan for and implement processes for making legislative information available electronically;

      (2) Promote and facilitate electronic access to the public of legislative information and services;

      (3) Establish technical standards for such services;

      (4) Consider electronic public access needs when planning new information systems or major upgrades of information systems;

      (5) Develop processes to determine which legislative information the public most wants and needs;

      (6) Increase capabilities to receive information electronically from the public and transmit forms, applications and other communications and transactions electronically;

      (7) Use technologies that allow continuous access twenty-four hours a day, seven days per week, involve little or no cost to access, and are capable of being used by persons without extensive technology ability; and

      (8) Consider and incorporate wherever possible ease of access to electronic technologies by persons with disabilities."

      Renumber remaining sections consecutively

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Sutherland, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6556 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Thibaudeau, Senator Snyder was excused.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6556.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6556 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn, Wood and Zarelli - 48.

      Excused: Senator Snyder - 1.

      ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6556, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6097, by Senator Rasmussen

Promoting beekeeping operations.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Rasmussen, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6097 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6097 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Rasmussen, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6097 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6097.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6097 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn, Wood and Zarelli - 48.

      Excused: Senator Snyder - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6097, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6522, by Senators Spanel, Long and Kohl

Limiting political activities of citizen members of the legislative ethics board.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Sheldon, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6522 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6522 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Sheldon, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6522 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

POINT OF INQUIRY

      Senator Spanel: "Senator McCaslin, are you opposing the bill, would you say?"

      Senator McCaslin: "How did you guess?"

      Further debate ensued.

POINT OF INQUIRY

      Senator Cantu: "Senator Spanel, the question I have, and I don't serve on the committee--I was just going over to see Senator McCaslin--but it states under the revised bill that a member can serve as a precinct committee officer and they can hold a part-time position, but it is non-partisan. It seems to me that we allow them to participate in a political party as an elected member of the party and yet, if they hold a position of part-time, it has to be non-partisan."

      Senator Spanel: "Well, that is actually--"

      Senator Cantu: "I was wondering the rationale for that. I am not trying--"

      Senator Spanel: "Existing law allows them to be a precinct committee person. That is the only elected position they can hold right now. That's the way it was written in the ethics bill when we passed it last year or the year before. So, it doesn't change that. So, that is a partisan position, I agree."

      Senator Cantu: "But, if they hold a part-time position, it has to be non partisan and I was just wondering the rationale. If you can be an elected party officer, if you will, because you have to run for that office of precinct committee person and the part-time job has to be non-partisan. I was just wondering of the rationale; it seems inconsistent, but--"

      Senator Spanel: "I think I didn't participate in that rationale."

      Further debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6522.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6522 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 1; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn, Wood and Zarelli - 47.

      Voting nay: Senator McCaslin - 1.

      Excused: Senator Snyder - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6522, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

MOTION

      At 2:52 p.m., on motion of Senator Spanel, the Senate was declared to be at ease.

      The Senate was called to order at 4:20 p.m. by President Pritchard.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6422, by Senators Haugen, Morton, Hale, Swecker, Prentice and Sutherland

Requiring additional planning for general aviation facilities.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Haugen, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6422 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6422 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Haugen, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6422 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Thibaudeau, Senator Fairley was excused.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6422.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6422 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 45; Nays, 0; Absent, 3; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, McAuliffe, McCaslin, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn, Wood and Zarelli - 45.

      Absent: Senators Loveland, McDonald and Sutherland - 3.

      Excused: Senator Fairley - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6422, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6514, by Senators Long, Hargrove, Schow, Kohl and Winsley

Enhancing preservation services for families.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6514 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6514 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6514 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6514.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6514 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 49; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 0.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn, Wood and Zarelli - 49.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6514, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6642, by Senators Heavey and Schow

Limiting voters of a port commissioner district to elect commissioners in districts with populations of five hundred thousand or more.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Haugen, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6642 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6642 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Haugen, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6642 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6642.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6642 and the bill failed to pass the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 24; Nays, 25; Absent, 0; Excused, 0.

      Voting yea: Senators Deccio, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Johnson, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, Morton, Oke, Owen, Prince, Rasmussen, Roach, Schow, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Sutherland and Wojahn - 24.

      Voting nay: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Drew, Fairley, Hale, Hochstatter, Kohl, Long, McDonald, Moyer, Newhouse, Pelz, Prentice, Quigley, Rinehart, Sellar, Sheldon, Strannigan, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wood and Zarelli - 25.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6642, having failed to receive the constitutional majority, was declared lost.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6177, by Senators Bauer and Kohl (by request of Higher Education Coordinating Board)

Changing provisions for degree granting institutions.

      The bill was read the second time.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Bauer, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6177 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6177.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6177 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 49; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 0.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn, Wood and Zarelli - 49.

      SENATE BILL NO. 6177, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

      Having voted on the prevailing side, Senator Winsley moved to reconsider the vote by which Substitute Senate Bill No. 6642 failed to pass the Senate earlier today.

      Senator Smith demanded a roll call and the demand was sustained.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the motion by Senator Winsley to reconsider the vote by which Substitute Senate Bill No. 6642 failed to pass the Senate.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll and the motion by Senator Winsley for reconsideration failed by the following vote: Yeas, 23; Nays, 25; Absent, 1; Excused, 0.

      Voting yea: Senators Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Johnson, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, Morton, Oke, Owen, Prince, Roach, Schow, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Sutherland, Winsley and Wojahn - 23.

      Voting nay: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Hale, Hochstatter, Kohl, Long, McDonald, Moyer, Newhouse, Pelz, Prentice, Quigley, Rinehart, Sellar, Sheldon, Strannigan, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Wood and Zarelli - 25.

      Absent: Senator Rasmussen - 1.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6694, by Senators Morton, A. Anderson and Rasmussen

Microchipping equine.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Rasmussen, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6694 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6694 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Rasmussen, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6694 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6694.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6694 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 1; Absent, 0; Excused, 0.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wood and Zarelli - 48.

      Voting nay: Senator Wojahn - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6694, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

      Having served prior notice, Senator Smith moved that the Senate now reconsider the amendment by Senators Schow, Zarelli, Morton and Johnson on page 2, beginning on line 1, to Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5375.

      Debate ensued.

      Senator Smith demanded a roll call and the demand was sustained.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the motion by Senator Smith to reconsider the vote by which the amendment by Senators Schow, Zarelli, Morton and Johnson on page 2, beginning on line 1, to Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5375 was adopted earlier today.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll and the motion for reconsideration of the amendment carried by the following vote: Yeas, 25; Nays, 24; Absent, 0; Excused, 0.

      Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Drew, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Haugen, Heavey, Kohl, Loveland, McAuliffe, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Sutherland, Thibaudeau, Winsley and Wojahn - 25.

      Voting nay: Senators Anderson, A., Cantu, Deccio, Finkbeiner, Hale, Hargrove, Hochstatter, Johnson, Long, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Prince, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Strannigan, Swecker, West, Wood and Zarelli - 24.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the reconsideration of the amendment by Senators Schow, Zarelli, Morton and Johnson on page 2, beginning on line 1, to Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5375.

      Debate ensued.

POINT OF INQUIRY

      Senator Wood: "Senator Smith, in your statement just a minute ago, you were talking about only a driver's license can be suspended."

      Senator Smith: "In the amendment, I believe that is what it says."

      Senator Wood: "I'm looking at the summary of the second substitute bill and in the first paragraph it talks about license suspension; it doesn't name what kind of license. Then in the second paragraph, it says, 'a noncustodial parent may seek judicial suspension of a custodial parent's driver's license or occupational or professional license.' Then, in the rest of the substitute, it doesn't describe what kind of license can be withheld. Could you clear it up for me, please?"

      Senator Smith: "Certainly. In the underlying bill, it is the same bill--and I guess I got a little presumptuous here since we had passed this now three or four times--and I assumed we had a better understanding of that. The underlying bill says a wide variety of business licenses, including bar associations--licensed attorneys--which has troubled some. A wide variety of business licenses are included in this bill as was included in the bill that was attached to the welfare bill. The reason that I mention the driver's licenses is that in the amendment it strips all of that away and says, 'just the driver's license can be taken away'--taking out all the other business licenses. The other states that have had success on this have had success in going after all the other licenses, not just the driver's license. That's the difference."

      Senator Wood: "Thank you. I just find this to be a very confusing bill that does not seem to state things in the way that I would like to see them clarified and if somebody else has more clarifications, it would certainly help."

      Senator Schow demanded a roll call and the demand was sustained.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the amendment by Senators Schow, Zarelli, Morton and Johnson on page 2, beginning on line 1, on reconsideration, to Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5375.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll and the amendment, on reconsideration, was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas, 22; Nays, 27; Absent, 0; Excused, 0.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Cantu, Deccio, Finkbeiner, Hale, Hargrove, Hochstatter, Johnson, Long, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Prince, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Strannigan, Swecker, West and Zarelli - 22.

      Voting nay: Senators Bauer, Drew, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Haugen, Heavey, Kohl, Loveland, McAuliffe, Moyer, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Sutherland, Thibaudeau, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 27.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Smith, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5375 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5375.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5375 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 35; Nays, 14; Absent, 0; Excused, 0.

      Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Kohl, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 35.

      Voting nay: Senators Anderson, A., Cantu, Finkbeiner, Hale, Hochstatter, Johnson, Long, Newhouse, Prince, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Swecker and Zarelli - 14.

      ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5375, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6274, by Senators Long, Hargrove, Roach, Quigley, Wood, Smith, Schow, Winsley, Oke, A. Anderson, Rasmussen, Haugen and McAuliffe

Providing for increased supervision of sex offenders for up to the entire maximum term of the sentence.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6274 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6274 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6274 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6274.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6274 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 0.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wood and Zarelli - 48.

      Absent: Senator Wojahn - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6274, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6391, by Senators Long, Prentice, Owen, Prince, Schow, Sellar and Haugen

Inspecting rebuilt salvage vehicles.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Owen, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6391 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6391 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Owen, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6391 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6391.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6391 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 49; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 0.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn, Wood and Zarelli - 49.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6391, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6235, by Senators Drew, McDonald, Haugen, Rinehart, Snyder, Kohl, Winsley, Sheldon, Bauer, Wood and Finkbeiner

Adopting ethics standards for academic or scientific public service work.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Drew, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6235 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6235 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Drew, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6235 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6235.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6235 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 0.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn, Wood and Zarelli - 48.

      Absent: Senator Hargrove - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6235, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6206, by Senators Haugen, Pelz, Winsley, Hale and Prentice

Regulating cosmetology, barbering, esthetics, and manicuring.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Haugen, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6206 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6206 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Haugen, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6206 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Hochstatter, Senator West was excused.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6206.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6206 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, Thibaudeau, Winsley, Wojahn, Wood and Zarelli - 47.

      Absent: Senator Hargrove - 1.

      Excused: Senator West - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6206, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6239, by Senators Wojahn, Winsley, Thibaudeau, Loveland, Kohl, Long, Fairley, A. Anderson, Prentice, McAuliffe, Sheldon, Wood, Rinehart, Roach, Spanel, Hale, Drew, Franklin, Rasmussen, Snyder, Haugen, Fraser and Bauer

Providing for osteoporosis prevention and treatment education.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Wojahn, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6239 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6239 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Wojahn, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6239 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Thibaudeau, Senator Hargrove was excused.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6239.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6239 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn, Wood and Zarelli - 48.

      Excused: Senator Hargrove - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6239, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6260, by Senators Drew, Owen, Prince, Haugen, Prentice, Kohl, Wood, Long, Sheldon, Schow, Strannigan, Sellar, Finkbeiner, Heavey, Fairley, McAuliffe, Rasmussen, Quigley, Rinehart, Goings, Thibaudeau and Winsley

Revising the state ride share tax credit.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Owen, Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6260 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6260 and the second substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Owen, the rules were suspended, Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6260 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6260.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6260 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 0.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn, Wood and Zarelli - 48.

      Absent: Senator Heavey - 1.

      SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6260, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6189, by Senators Haugen, Smith and McCaslin (by request of Supreme Court)

Creating the office of public defense.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Haugen, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6189 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6189 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Haugen, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6189 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6189.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6189 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 49; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 0.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn, Wood and Zarelli - 49.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6189, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6736, by Senators Goings, Pelz, Heavey, Rasmussen, McAuliffe, Fraser, Bauer, Franklin, Loveland, Sheldon, Spanel, Fairley, Thibaudeau, Wojahn, Snyder, Sutherland, Drew, Rinehart, Kohl, Smith, Haugen and Winsley

Providing for binding arbitration for employees of school districts.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Pelz, Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6736 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6736 and the second substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      Senator West moved that the following amendment be adopted:

      On page 4, line 31, after "is" strike "not granted" and insert "prohibited"

      Renumber the sections consecutively and correct any internal references accordingly.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senator West on page 4, line 31, to Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6736.

      The motion by Senator West carried and the amendment was adopted.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Pelz, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6736 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

POINT OF INQUIRY

      Senator Oke: "Senator Pelz, knowing that you are a sport's enthusiast and knowing that you watch sports very carefully, do you feel that binding arbitration has been good for sports in this country, when one price goes up, the next one goes up and up? I can just imagine, if I might continue before you respond, one area in this state having binding arbitration work out and some very nice things and then everywhere else that wants that--is that going to happen in the state of Washington?"

      Senator Pelz: "Well, I think that maybe you are speaking about salary arbitration, which, in sports has been somewhat of a disaster, but also, I think in sports, the economic picture has been changing and there has been more and more revenue available to the teams. I think that we know that K-12 is not an arena in which there is going to be more and more revenue available for the teams that an arbitrator might pick from. We have greater fiscal sense in Washington right now. We have 601, we have tough budgets to come out of the state--voters are rejecting levies. I think there are limited finances that school districts, such as I know the one that you represent, and which has had some difficult times, there are very limited financial resources in some of those districts and in binding arbitration, the arbitrator will take that into consideration."

      Further debate ensued.

POINT OF INQUIRY

      Senator Deccio: "Senator Pelz, the original bill had a provision that if there was no other recourse, a school district could not come back to the Legislature in regards to the level we have set for salaries. That has been removed, so in the event they can't raise the money in a special levy, they can come back to the Legislature to request those additional dollars. What happens if the spirit of 601 is violated and the Legislature turns down the increase, then what will happen? There is no penalty for a strike. Is it possible a school district could strike in that event?"

      Senator Pelz: "Well, the bill lays out a time table for bargaining and I believe the time table kicks in about May when the two sides begin to bargain. What happens is, they will bargain as they do today, and biding arbitration only kicks in at the point when an impasse--a serious impasse--is reached and this is after mediation. The bill has a procedure for mediation, so the system isn't that much different than it is today where they sit down around May and they begin to do collective bargaining.

      "Unfortunately, our school districts are currently suffering under a great problem, which in May, they often don't know the kind of resources the Legislature is going to give them that year. So, currently across the state, districts begin bargaining before they know how much the Legislature will give them. Basically, as the bargaining progresses through the summer, hopefully, we have the good sense to get out of Olympia every year and by May and June, the school districts do know how much money is on the table to bargain. In many ways, this bill does not change that element of the process."

      Senator Deccio: "I don't know that you have answered my question. We removed the prohibition against coming back to the Legislature. My question again is, if the Legislature refuses to grant those additional funds, binding arbitration says,' You will pay whether you can afford to pay or not.' That's what the cities and the counties say at least and if these are the same binding arbitration rules, the same rules hold effect. Once, the binding arbitration is made, they would have to pay regardless. If they can't get the money from the Legislature, because it violates 601, where does the school district go for the money?"

      Senator Pelz: "Again, Senator Deccio, the fiscal condition of the school district is clearly an issue that the arbitrator has to consider. If the district is broke, I would contend that the arbitrator is not going to force the district to pay fantastic amounts of money that they don't have. I think that that is going to be clearly a limitation placed on the arbitration. You are right, the school district will not be able to come back to the Legislature, but I think what binding arbitration is all about is making sure that school districts aren't stuck with hugh settlements that they can't afford. Maybe there will be a case out there where that is not true, but it is just hard for me to project, sir, and I am trying my best to answer your question."

      Senator Deccio: "I think I have made my case, Mr. President. Thank you."

      Further debate ensued.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Wood, Senator McCaslin was excused.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6736.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6736 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 31; Nays, 17; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Drew, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Kohl, Loveland, McAuliffe, Moyer, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Wood - 31.

      Voting nay: Senators Cantu, Deccio, Finkbeiner, Hale, Hochstatter, Johnson, Long, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Prince, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Swecker and Zarelli - 17.

      Excused: Senator McCaslin - 1.

      ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6736, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Spanel, the Senate commenced consideration of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 5841.

SECOND READING

      ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 5841, by Senators Pelz, Winsley, Gaspard, Roach, Snyder, Loveland, Rinehart, McAuliffe, Spanel, Heavey, Franklin, Bauer, Smith, Fairley, Prentice, Fraser, Kohl, Quigley, Rasmussen, Sutherland, Sheldon, Drew, Wojahn, West, Wood, C. Anderson and Moyer (by request of Governor Lowry)

Enacting the personnel system reform act of 1995.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Pelz, Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5841 was substituted for Engrossed Senate Bill No. 5841 and the second substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Pelz, the rules were suspended, Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5841 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Wood, Senator Moyer was excused.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5841.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5841 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 27; Nays, 20; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Drew, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hargrove, Heavey, Kohl, Loveland, McAuliffe, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Sutherland, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley and Wojahn - 27.

      Voting nay: Senators Anderson, A., Cantu, Deccio, Finkbeiner, Hale, Haugen, Hochstatter, Johnson, Long, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Prince, Schow, Sellar, Strannigan, Swecker, Wood and Zarelli - 20.

      Excused: Senators McCaslin and Moyer - 2.

      SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5841, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6718, by Senators Sutherland, McDonald, Finkbeiner, Winsley, Haugen and Hochstatter (by request of State Archivist)

Funding local government archives and records management.

      The bill was read the second time.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Haugen, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6718 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6718.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6718 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 41; Nays, 6; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Deccio, Drew, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McDonald, Morton, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Sutherland, Swecker, Thibaudeau, Winsley, Wojahn, Wood and Zarelli - 41.

      Voting nay: Senators Cantu, Finkbeiner, Hochstatter, Schow, Strannigan and West - 6.

      Excused: Senators McCaslin and Moyer - 2.

      SENATE BILL NO. 6718, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6672, by Senators Hargrove, Long and Oke (by request of Department of Social and Health Services and Department of Corrections)

Requiring department of corrections personnel to report suspected abuse of children and adult dependent and developmentally disabled persons.

      The bill was read the second time.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6672 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6672.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6672 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 1.

      Voting yea: Senators Anderson, A., Bauer, Cantu, Deccio, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Kohl, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McDonald, Morton, Moyer, Newhouse, Oke, Owen, Pelz, Prentice, Prince, Quigley, Rasmussen, Rinehart, Roach, Schow, Sellar, Sheldon, Smith, Snyder, Spanel, Strannigan, Sutherland, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn, Wood and Zarelli - 47.

      Absent: Senator Drew - 1.

      Excused: Senator McCaslin - 1.

      SENATE BILL NO. 6672, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      SENATE BILL NO. 6266, by Senators Morton, Haugen, McCaslin, Rasmussen, Hargrove and Schow

Establishing lost and uncertain boundaries.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Smith, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6266 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6266 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Morton, the following amendment was adopted:

      Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

      "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The purpose of this chapter is to provide alternative procedures for fixing boundary points or lines when they cannot be determined from the existing public record and landmarks or are otherwise in dispute. This chapter does not impair, modify, or supplant any other remedy available at law or equity.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. As used in this chapter, "surveyor" means every person authorized to practice the profession of land surveying under the provisions of chapter 18.43 RCW.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. Whenever a point or line determining the boundary between two or more parcels of real property cannot be identified from the existing public record, monuments, and landmarks, or is in dispute, the landowners affected by the determination of the point or line may resolve any dispute and fix the boundary point or line by one of the following procedures:

      (1) If all of the affected landowners agree to a description and marking of a point or line determining a boundary, they shall document the agreement in a written instrument, using appropriate legal descriptions and including a survey map, filed in accordance with chapter 58.09 RCW. The written instrument shall be signed and acknowledged by each party in the manner required for a conveyance of real property. The agreement is binding upon the parties, their successors, assigns, heirs and devisees and runs with the land. The agreement shall be recorded with the real estate records in the county or counties in which the affected parcels of real estate or any portion of them is located;

      (2) If all of the affected landowners cannot agree to a point or line determining the boundary between two or more parcels of real estate, any one of them may bring suit for determination as provided in RCW 58.04.020.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. Any surveyor authorized by the court and the surveyor's employees may, without liability for trespass, enter upon any land or waters and remain there while performing the duties as required in sections 1 through 4 of this act. The persons named in this section may, without liability for trespass, investigate, construct, or place a monument or reference monuments for the position of any land boundary mark or general land office corner or mark and subdivisional corners thereof. Persons entering lands under the authority of sections 1 through 4 of this act must exercise due care not to damage property while on land or waters performing their duties, and are liable for property damage, if any, caused by their negligence or willful misconduct. Where practical, the persons named in this section must announce and identify themselves and their intention before entering upon private property in the performance of their duties.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. A person who intentionally disturbs a survey monument placed by a surveyor in the performance of the surveyor's duties is guilty of a gross misdemeanor and is liable for the cost of the reestablishment.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. RCW 58.04.010 and 1895 c 77 s 9 are each repealed.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. Sections 1 through 5 of this act are each added to chapter 58.04 RCW.

      Sec. 8. RCW 58.04.020 and 1886 p 104 s 1 are each amended to read as follows: