WSR 00-12-086PREPROPOSAL STATEMENT OF INQUIRY
OFFICE OF THEINSURANCE COMMISSIONER
[
Insurance Commissioner Matter No. R 2000-02 --
Filed June 6, 2000,
4:05 p.m.
]Subject of Possible Rule Making: The commissioner will
consider new rules to implement the recently enacted "patient
bill of rights" chapter 5, Laws of 2000 (E2SSB 6199). The new
law covers seven areas that will be the subject of rules: Health
information privacy, information disclosure, access to health
care services, insurer review of health care (utilization
review), grievance processes, and independent review
organizations. Several of the subjects require the commissioner
to adopt rules.
⧫ |
Health Information Privacy |
> |
State laws grant patients the right to obtain certain
types of health care in complete confidentiality such
as treatment for alcoholism or depression. What rules
should the Office of the Insurance Commissioner (OIC)
adopt to ensure that when benefits are paid for such
treatment, no one other than the patient, the health
care professional, and the payer know about treatment? |
> |
Congress and federal agencies are considering new laws
affecting health care privacy. What areas of health
information privacy should the OIC address irrespective
of federal action and how should these rules anticipate
federal action? |
> |
Consumers and health care professionals complain that
payers request more information than is necessary to
determine benefits and pay claims. What limits should
the OIC place on payer access to health information? |
> |
The patient bill of rights (PBR) extends privacy
standards to both health carriers and insurers. To
what extent should rules that apply to health carriers
differ from rules that apply to other insurers? |
⧫ |
Health Information Disclosure |
> |
The OIC has adopted several rules in the past two years
governing disclosure, a few of which have yet to take
effect. How should the OIC proceed to integrate new
disclosure standards with existing disclosure
requirements? |
> |
The PBR permits insurers to withhold "proprietary"
information. How should the OIC interpret this
standard to ensure a uniform approach to information
disclosure by all insurers? |
> |
The PBR requires disclosure in a manner that ensures
that a substantial portion of enrollees can make use of
the information. What standards should the OIC
establish for the method and style of information
disclosures? |
⧫ |
Health Care Access Standards |
> |
The PBR requires that all health plans give consumers
an "adequate choice among health care providers." What
rules should the OIC adopt to assist in determinations
as to whether plans have complied with this standard? |
> |
Consumers are permitted to obtain chiropractic care
without a prior referral subject to managed care and
cost containment processes. What rules should the OIC
adopt to provide guidance on acceptable limitations on
direct access to chiropractic care? |
> |
Consumers are permitted to continue treatment with a
provider for sixty days following the provider's
termination from a plan. What rules should the OIC
adopt to govern the process of coverage of terminated
providers? |
⧫ |
Health Care Decisions |
> |
The PBR requires the OIC to adopt rules governing
insurer standards for review of health care coverage
which standards must be based upon "reasonable medical
evidence." What rules should the OIC adopt to provide
guidance for interpretation of this standard of medical
evidence? |
> |
The PBR requires the OIC to adopt rules governing the
ban on health plan denials of coverage when the insurer
has already authorized care. How should the OIC
interpret "prior authorization" and provide guidance
for compliance? |
⧫ |
Grievance Processes |
> |
The OIC has already adopted limited rules governing
expedited review of the denial of health care. How
should the OIC integrate these rules with new standards
under the PBR? |
> |
The PBR establishes a process for independent review of
consumer complaints. How should the OIC integrate the
grievance process with this new independent review? |
> |
The PBR grants the OIC the ability to set standards for
grievance processes. What rules should the OIC adopt
to explain or clarify acceptable grievance processes? |
⧫ |
Independent Review Organizations |
> |
The PBR requires the OIC to adopt rules to implement
the independent review process. What standards should
the OIC set to ensure implementation of this process by
July 2001? |
> |
The PBR requires a consumer to exhaust the internal
grievance process of an insurer before using the
independent review process. What standards should the
OIC set for insurers who wish to allow consumers
quicker access to independent review by simplifying the
internal grievance process? |
> |
The PBR permits consumers to be held responsible for
health care costs if the independent reviewers uphold
the insurer's position. What guidelines should the OIC
establish to protect consumers from unexpected health
care costs? |
Statutes Authorizing the Agency to Adopt Rules on this Subject: RCW 48.02.060, 48.18.120, 48.20.450, 48.20.460,
48.30.010, 48.44.050, 48.46.100, 48.46.200, sections 5, 6, 7, 8,
9, 10 and 11, chapter 5, Laws of 2000.
Reasons Why Rules on this Subject may be Needed and What They Might Accomplish: The legislature granted rule-making
authority or mandated rules to implement the patient bill of
rights. Many of the subjects addressed by the new law cannot be
implemented by their effective dates without rules. In each
instance, the legislature expressly provided that the
commissioner consider national and local standards to create more
detailed guidance for insurers. Many of the provisions of the
new law are general and leave to the commissioner the authority
to establish comprehensive standards. More detailed guidance is
particularly necessary for privacy, utilization review, and
grievance processes in order to create uniform standards across
all health plans.
Other Federal and State Agencies that Regulate this Subject and the Process Coordinating the Rule with These Agencies: Other
state agencies are expressly subject to any rules adopted under
the patient bill of rights. The commissioner will work with
these state agencies to develop a coordinated approach to
consumer protection. The commissioner will also consider
relevant federal agency activity to avoid conflicting standards.
Process for Developing New Rule:
Agency study; and the
following fact-finding hearings have been scheduled: On July 10,
2000, at 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m., Fidalgo Room in Northwest Rooms
at Seattle Center, 305 Harrison Street, Seattle, WA 98109; on
July 11, 2000, at 2:00 - 5:00 p.m., Spokane City Hall, Council
Chamber, 808 West Spokane Falls Boulevard, Spokane, WA
99201-3301; and on July 13, 2000, at 2:00 - 5:00 p.m., Yakima
Four Square Church, 1705 West Chestnut Avenue, Yakima, WA 98902.
Interested parties can participate in the decision to adopt the new rule and formulation of the proposed rule before publication by contacting Kacy Brandeberry, P.O. Box 40255,
Olympia, WA 98504-0255, e-mail Kacyb@oic.wa.gov, fax (360)
664-2782, by July 9, 2000.
June 6, 2000
Robert A. Harkins
Chief Deputy Commissioner
© Washington State Code Reviser's Office