PROPOSED RULES
Original Notice.
Preproposal statement of inquiry was filed as WSR 03-19-060.
Title of Rule and Other Identifying Information: Amending WAC 458-12-050 ((Listing of real property--))Omitted
property and omitted value and 458-12-110 ((Listing of
personalty -- Estimate listing penalty)) Listing of personal
property by the assessor -- Penalties for failing to list
personal property and for making a false or fraudulent
listing; and repealing WAC 458-12-095 Listing of
personalty -- Partial listing, 458-12-100 Listing of
personalty -- Omitted property -- Omitted value and 458-12-105
Listing of personalty--Willful failure to list or fraudulent
listing -- Penalty.
Hearing Location(s): Capital Plaza Building, 4th Floor, L&P Large Conference Room, 1025 Union Avenue S.E., Olympia, WA, on November 18, 2004, at 10:00 a.m.
Date of Intended Adoption: November 29, 2004.
Submit Written Comments to: James A. Winterstein, P.O. Box 47453, Olympia, WA 98504-7453, e-mail JimWi@dor.wa.gov, fax (360) 586-5543, by November 18, 2004.
Assistance for Persons with Disabilities: Contact Sandy Davis no later than ten days before the hearing date, TTY 1-800-451-7985 or (360) 725-7499.
Purpose of the Proposal and Its Anticipated Effects, Including Any Changes in Existing Rules: WAC 458-12-050 proposes to amend the existing rule and incorporate portions of the rules proposed for repeal by defining omitted property and omitted value and explaining how the assessor deals with omitted property and value under chapter 84.40 RCW. The rule also explains when the taxes are due on omitted property and value assessments, and the appeal rights of persons affected by these assessments.
WAC 458-12-110 proposes to amend the existing rule and incorporate portions of the rules proposed for repeal by explaining the process for listing and assessing taxable personal property by the assessor when the taxpayer fails or refuses to provide the information to the assessor as required under chapter 84.40 RCW. The rule also explains how and when penalties are imposed and provides examples.
Reasons Supporting Proposal: The two rules update and consolidate information with respect to omitted property and value and provide the information in a clearer and more user-friendly manner.
Statutory Authority for Adoption: RCW 84.08.010 and 84.08.070.
Statute Being Implemented: RCW 84.40.040, [84.40.]080, [84.40.]085, [84.40.]130, and [84.40.]200.
Rule is not necessitated by federal law, federal or state court decision.
Name of Proponent: [Department of Revenue], governmental.
Name of Agency Personnel Responsible for Drafting: James A. Winterstein, 1025 Union Avenue S.E., Suite #544, Olympia, WA, (360) 570-6117; Implementation and Enforcement: Peri Maxey, 1025 Union Avenue S.E., Suite #200, Olympia, WA, (360) 570-5860.
No small business economic impact statement has been prepared under chapter 19.85 RCW. A small business economic impact statement is not required for the reason that the rule does not impose any new performance requirement or administrative burden on any small business.
A cost-benefit analysis is not required under RCW 34.05.328. The proposed rules are not significant legislative rules as defined by RCW 34.05.328.
October 6, 2004
Alan R. Lynn
OTS-7393.1
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending Order PT 68-6, filed 4/29/68)
WAC 458-12-050
((Listing of real property -- ))Omitted
property and omitted value.
((Whenever any real property is
omitted from the assessment rolls, the assessor shall have the
right and duty to go back and separately value and list such
property as omitted property. When improvements or land are
omitted, the assessor shall check back for a period of three
years and base his assessment on the value of the improvements
as of the year or years omitted regardless of the reason why
the improvements or land were omitted from the rolls. If it
is found that a bona-fide purchaser (third party) had
purchased or acquired any interest in the property prior to
the time such improvements are assessed and without knowledge
that the property is omitted, then there shall be no
assessment made. (RCW 84.40.080) If any question arises as to
whether or not the improvement has in fact been omitted, the
burden of proof shall be on the assessor to show that it has. (TCR 3-17-1953) Under no circumstances, however, is this
section to be used for the purpose of revaluation or
reassessment. (Wood Lbr. Company v. Whatcom County, 5 Wn.2d
63 (1940))
Once the omitted improvement assessment is made the taxpayer shall have one year from the date the tax for the current year becomes due to pay the back taxes without penalty or interest. (RCW 84.40.080.))) (1) Introduction. Under RCW 84.40.080, an assessor is required to add to the assessment roll any real or personal property omitted from the assessment roll for any preceding year, at the value for the preceding year. The assessor is also required to add to the assessment roll any omitted value of personal property. This rule explains the meaning of the terms "omitted property" and "omitted value." It also provides information about omitted property and omitted value assessments, including when the taxes on these assessments are due and the appeal rights of persons receiving an omitted property or omitted value assessment.
(2) What is omitted property? Omitted property includes all real and personal property that was not entered on the assessment roll. Omitted property does not include:
(a) Real or personal property that was listed on the assessment roll but improperly exempted from taxation in prior years; and
(b) Real or personal property that was accurately listed but improperly valued by the assessor.
(3) What is omitted value? Omitted value includes all personal property that was assessed at less than its true and fair value due to inaccurate reporting by the taxpayer or person making the listing. Omitted value does not include:
(a) Personal property that was listed on the assessment roll but improperly exempted from taxation in prior years; and
(b) Personal property that was accurately listed but improperly valued by the assessor.
(4) What is the duty of the assessor upon discovery of omitted property or value? Whenever the assessor discovers or is made aware of omitted property or omitted value, the assessor is required to make an omitted property or omitted value assessment at the property's true and fair value for each year omitted, subject to the requirements of (a) and (b) of this subsection. The assessor is required to notify the property owner or taxpayer of the omitted property or value assessment for each year omitted and the value shall be stated separately from the value of any other year. The assessor must value real property for the years omitted in accordance with the revaluation cycle of the county. For an omitted value assessment, the assessor must provide the taxpayer with a copy of the amended personal property statement along with a letter of particulars informing the taxpayer of the assessor's findings. The assessor must also notify the property owner or taxpayer of the right to appeal an omitted value assessment to the board of equalization and the right to request the board be reconvened to act on the omitted property or omitted value assessment.
(a) Improvements omitted from the assessment roll. Where improvements have not been valued and assessed as a part of the real estate upon which the improvements are located, as evidenced by the assessment rolls, they may be separately valued and assessed as omitted property. No such omitted assessment can be made where a bona fide purchaser, encumbrancer, or contract buyer has acquired any interest in the property prior to the time the improvements are assessed. Thus, if a purchaser, encumbrancer, or contract buyer has acquired an interest in improvements that have been omitted from the assessment roll by giving valuable consideration, in good faith, and without actual or constructive knowledge of the omission of the assessment, the assessor is prohibited from making an omitted property assessment. However, if the assessment roll is still open in the year the omission is discovered, the improvements must be added to the assessment roll for that assessment year. If the assessment roll is closed for that year, the improvements must be placed on the assessment roll in the following year.
(b) Limitation period for omitted property or omitted value assessments. No omitted property or omitted value assessment can be made for any period more than three years preceding the year in which the omission is discovered. RCW 84.40.085.
(5) When are taxes on omitted property or omitted value assessments due? When an omitted property or omitted value assessment is made, the taxes levied as a result of the assessment may be paid within one year of the due date of the taxes for the year in which the assessment is made without penalty or interest. An assessment is "made," for purposes of omitted property or omitted value assessments, when the assessor notifies the taxpayer in writing of the property and/or value that was previously omitted from the assessment roll. Taxes resulting from an omitted property or omitted value assessment are due on April 30th and cannot be timely paid in two installments, unlike taxes for the current tax year.
(a) Penalties and interest. If the taxes due on an omitted property or omitted value assessment are not paid by the due date, the penalties and interest provided in RCW 84.56.020 begin to accrue from the date the taxes become delinquent.
(b) Examples. The following examples identify a number of facts and then state a conclusion. These examples should be used only as a general guide. The status of each actual situation must be determined after a review of all of the facts and circumstances.
(i) In April 2003, an assessor discovers an improvement that has never been valued, that is, the assessment roll shows no improvement on the property. Construction of the improvement was completed in June 2001. (This fact means the assessor should have added the improvement to the assessment roll by the end of August 2001 under the "new construction" statute, RCW 36.21.080.) No bona fide purchaser, encumbrancer, or contract buyer has acquired any interest in the improvement. The assessor values the improvement for 2001, 2002, and the current assessment year of 2003, and mails a valuation notice to the taxpayer. The taxes for the 2003 assessment year are due on April 30, 2004. If the amount due is fifty dollars or more, one-half of the tax due may be paid by April 30, 2004, and the balance may be paid by October 31, 2004. The taxes for the omitted property assessment covering the 2001 and 2002 assessment years are due in full by April 30, 2005, which is one year after the due date for the taxes for the assessment year in which the omitted property assessment is made. If the taxes for the omitted assessment are not paid in full by April 30, 2005, the penalties and interest provided in RCW 84.56.020 begin to accrue as of May 1, 2005, on the unpaid amount.
(ii) In November 2002, after the assessment rolls are closed, an assessor discovers an improvement that has never been valued, that is, the assessment roll shows no improvement on the property. Construction of the improvement was completed in March 1998. No bona fide purchaser, encumbrancer, or contract buyer has acquired any interest in the improvement. The assessor adds the improvement to the assessment roll at true and fair value for 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002, and mails a valuation notice to the taxpayer. Because the roll is closed for assessment year 2002, no taxes are due on the improvement in 2003. The taxes resulting from this omitted property assessment are due in full by April 30, 2004, which is one year after the due date for the taxes for the assessment year in which the omitted property assessment is made. (Although the roll is closed in 2002, the assessment is still "made" in 2002.) If the taxes for the omitted property assessment are not paid in full by April 30, 2004, the penalties and interest provided in RCW 84.56.020 begin to accrue as of May 1, 2004, on the unpaid amount. The taxes for the 2003 assessment year are due on April 30, 2004. If the amount due is fifty dollars or more, one-half of the tax due may be paid by April 30, 2004, and the balance may be paid by October 31, 2004.
(iii) In May 2004, an assessor audits a taxpayer's personal property records and discovers omitted value not reported by the taxpayer. The personal property was acquired by the taxpayer in 1997, and disposed of by the taxpayer in November 2003. The assessor values the property at true and fair value for assessment years 2001, 2002, and 2003, and notifies the taxpayer of the omitted value by forwarding a copy of the amended personal property statements along with a letter of particulars informing the taxpayer of the assessor's findings and of the taxpayer's right to appeal those findings to the board of equalization, and/or to request that the board of equalization be reconvened to act on the omitted value assessment. The taxes resulting from the omitted value assessment are due in full by April 30, 2006, which is one year after the due date for the taxes for the assessment year in which the omitted value assessment is made. If the taxes for the omitted value assessment are not paid in full by April 30, 2006, the penalties and interest provided in RCW 84.56.020 begin to accrue as of May 1, 2006, on the unpaid amount.
(6) What are the appeal rights of taxpayers receiving an omitted property or omitted value assessment? Upon request of either the taxpayer or the assessor, the county board of equalization may be reconvened to act on an omitted property or omitted value assessment. RCW 84.40.085. For additional information on reconvened boards of equalization, refer to WAC 458-14-127.
[Order PT 68-6, § 458-12-050, filed 4/29/68.]
OTS-7394.2
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending Order PT 68-6, filed 4/29/68)
WAC 458-12-110
((Listing of personalty -- Estimate listing
penalty.)) Listing of personal property by the
assessor -- Penalties for failing to list personal property and
for making a false or fraudulent listing.
((If a personal
property statement or list is not submitted within the time
allowed either by law or by the assessor where an extension
has been granted, the assessor shall ascertain the amount and
value of the property which should have been reported. (RCW 84.40.200) When such a listing is made by the assessor, he
shall deliver or mail a copy to the person for whom the
listing is made. The copy delivered must show the valuation
of the property listed, and must be signed by the assessor. On the copy of the listing delivered or mailed, the assessor
shall notify the person for whom the listing is made of his
possible liability for penalties for his failure to make the
list himself.
The listing made by the assessor shall be used by him for all purposes in the same manner as though it was submitted by the person required to list, until such person does submit the required statement.
When a statement of personal property subject to taxation is not submitted by the date prescribed, the taxpayer becomes liable to a penalty of 5% of the total tax determined to be due, for each month or fraction thereof from the date that the listing was due to the date that it is actually received, in acceptable form, by the assessor. The performance by the assessor of his duty to ascertain the amount and value of taxable property in the event of the failure of the person required to do so shall not be taken to be such a report as would terminate the accrual of this penalty.
The penalty provided for by this rule shall actually be assessed at the time that taxes are spread on the rolls, to a maximum of 25% of the tax found to be due, and shall then be added to the tax assessed, and collected in the same manner as such taxes. If the person required to list property can show, to the satisfaction of the assessor, that his failure to report is due to a reasonable cause, no late filing penalty shall be assessed.)) (1) Introduction. This rule explains the process of listing and assessing taxable personal property by the assessor when the taxpayer fails to make a listing as required by chapter 84.40 RCW. This rule also provides information about the penalties imposed by RCW 84.40.130 for persons who fail or refuse to make a timely listing of their taxable personal property or who willfully provide the assessor a false or fraudulent listing of their taxable personal property. For additional information about the listing of personal property, refer to the rules found in WAC 458-12-060 through 458-12-080.
(2) Failure to provide a listing of taxable personal property to the assessor. If a person who is required under chapter 84.40 RCW to make a listing of taxable personal property with the county assessor fails to do so by April 30, it is the duty of the assessor under RCW 84.40.200 to ascertain the amount and value of the taxable personal property that should have been listed. When such a listing is made by the assessor, he or she must deliver or mail a copy of the listing, showing the valuation of the property so listed, to the person for whom the listing is made. The provisions of RCW 84.40.200 do not apply to the listing of ships and vessels required under RCW 84.40.065.
(3) Penalty for failing or refusing to make a listing of taxable personal property. A person who fails or refuses to provide the assessor with a listing of their taxable personal property by April 30 is subject to a mandatory penalty. The amount of the penalty is described below in (a) of this subsection.
(a) Amount of penalty. The amount of the penalty is five percent of the amount of tax assessed against the taxpayer on the property not listed, not to exceed fifty dollars per calendar day if the delinquency is for less than one month. If the delinquency is for more than one month, the taxpayer must pay an additional five percent of the amount of tax for each additional month or fraction of a month that the listing is delinquent, up to a maximum penalty each year of twenty-five percent of the amount of tax. The penalty provided in this subsection (3) will be collected in the same manner as the tax to which it is added.
(b) How does the penalty apply when a listing is made by the assessor? When the assessor makes a listing of taxable personal property under the provisions of RCW 84.40.200 and subsection (2) of this rule, the penalty provided in this subsection (3) continues to accrue until the taxpayer provides a listing to the assessor as required by chapter 84.40 RCW.
(c) Can the penalty be waived? If a person can establish to the satisfaction of the assessor that the failure to provide a listing of taxable personal property was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, no penalty will be imposed.
Whether reasonable cause exists depends upon the facts of each case. Reasonable cause may be shown by one or more of the following events or circumstances. These examples do not encompass all of the possible events or circumstances that could constitute reasonable cause for failing to make a listing of taxable personal property with the assessor by the due date.
(i) The taxpayer was unable to make a listing by the due date because of a death or serious illness of the taxpayer or of a member of the taxpayer's immediate family occurring at or shortly before the due date. For purposes of this subsection, the term "immediate family" includes, but is not limited to, a grandparent, parent, brother, sister, spouse, child, or grandchild.
(ii) The taxpayer was unable to make a listing by the due date because the taxpayer reasonably relied upon incorrect, ambiguous, or misleading written advice as to the proper listing requirements by either the assessor or assessor's staff, or the property tax advisor designated under RCW 84.48.140, or his or her staff.
(iii) The taxpayer was unable to make a listing by the due date because of a natural disaster such as a flood or earthquake occurring at or shortly before the due date.
(iv) The taxpayer was unable to make a listing by the due date because of a delay or loss related to the delivery of the listing form by the postal service. The taxpayer must be able to provide documentation from the postal service of such a delay or loss.
(v) The failure of the assessor to provide a notice and listing form as required by RCW 84.40.040 to a taxpayer does not excuse a taxpayer from making a timely listing of taxable personal property with the assessor. The assessor's failure to provide a notice and listing form may, however, be considered in determining whether the taxpayer's failure to provide a timely listing was due to reasonable cause.
(d) How are the penalties distributed? When collected, the penalties provided for in this subsection (3) are credited to the county current expense fund. RCW 84.40.130 and 84.56.020(8).
(e) Examples. The following examples identify a number of facts and then state a conclusion. These examples should be used only as a general guide. The status of each actual situation must be determined after a review of all of the facts and circumstances.
(i) Due to an oversight, Company A makes its listing of taxable personal property on October 6th of the assessment year, over five months after the deadline provided in RCW 84.40.040. The amount of tax imposed against Company A on its personal property in the following year is $600.00. Company A is subject to a penalty of $150.00, 25% of the amount of its tax liability.
(ii) Due to an oversight, Company B makes its listing of taxable personal property on May 2nd of the assessment year, two days after the deadline provided in RCW 84.40.040. The amount of tax imposed against Company B on its personal property in the following year is $2,250.00. The amount of the penalty assessed against Company B is $100.00. 5% of $2,250.00 is $112.50. However, the penalty is limited to $50.00 per calendar day when the delinquency does not exceed one month.
(iii) Due to an oversight, Company C fails to make a listing of its taxable personal property by April 30th, the deadline provided in RCW 84.40.040. On August 24th of the assessment year, the assessor lists and values the taxable personal property of Company C and mails a copy of the listing to Company C. At this time, Company C would be subject to a penalty of 20% of the tax imposed against it on its personal property in the following year. After receiving the assessor's listing, Company C makes its own listing with the assessor on September 7th of the assessment year. The amount of penalty imposed is 25% of the tax imposed against Company C on its personal property in the following year. The listing by the assessor has no effect on the amount of the penalty Company C is subject to.
(iv) Due to an oversight, Company D fails to make a listing of its taxable personal property for assessment years 2001, 2002, and 2003. In May of 2003, the assessor learns of Company D's failure to list its taxable personal property for the 2001, 2002, and 2003 assessment years. After being notified by the assessor of its failure to make a listing, Company D makes a listing for assessment years 2001, 2002, and 2003 with the assessor on May 20, 2003. The assessor adds the taxable personal property for 2003 to the assessment roll. The assessor also adds the taxable personal property for 2001 and 2002 to the assessment roll as omitted property under the provisions of RCW 84.40.080. The penalties assessed against Company D include a penalty of 25%, for each year, of the amount of tax imposed on Company D resulting from the omitted property assessment for assessment years 2001 and 2002. In addition, Company D is subject to a penalty for the delinquent 2003 listing in the amount of 5% of the amount of tax imposed on Company D resulting from the listing for the 2003 assessment year or $1,000, whichever is less. The amount of $1,000 represents $50 per calendar day of delinquency. For additional information about omitted property, refer to WAC 458-12-050.
(4) Penalty for willfully providing a false or fraudulent listing of taxable personal property. If a person willfully provides the assessor with a false or fraudulent listing of taxable personal property, or, with the intent to defraud, fails or refuses to provide a listing of taxable personal property as required by chapter 84.40 RCW, the person is subject to a penalty of one hundred percent of the tax properly due. A false or fraudulent listing may arise because it does not include all of the taxable personal property in the ownership, possession, or control of the person making the listing, or because it contains false information relating to the proper value of the personal property listed. A person is not liable for the penalty provided in this subsection (4) if the failure to list or the false listing was the result of negligence, inadvertence, accident, or simple oversight rather than willfulness or an intent to defraud. Likewise, a person making a false listing will not be subject to the penalty provided in this subsection (4) if it is shown that the misrepresentations made by the person are entirely attributable to reasonable cause. The penalty imposed under this subsection (4) is in lieu of the penalty imposed under subsection (3) of this rule.
(a) How is the penalty imposed? The assessor does not impose the penalty provided in this subsection (4). Rather, the penalty provided for in this subsection along with any tax properly due are to be recovered in a lawsuit brought in the name of the state of Washington on the complaint of the county assessor or the county legislative authority. The provisions of this subsection (4) are in addition to any other provisions of law relating to the recovery of property taxes.
(b) How is the penalty distributed? When collected, the penalty imposed under this subsection (4) and the tax to which it was added must be paid into the county treasury to the credit of the current expense fund.
[Order PT 68-6, § 458-12-110, filed 4/29/68.]