PROPOSED RULES
ADMINISTRATION BOARD
Original Notice.
Exempt from preproposal statement of inquiry under RCW 34.05.310(4).
Title of Rule and Other Identifying Information: WAC 136-400-010, 136-400-020, 136-400-030, 136-400-040, 136-400-050, 136-400-060, 136-400-065, 136-400-070, 136-400-080, 136-400-090, 136-400-100, 136-400-110 and 136-400-120, ferry capital improvement projects.
Hearing Location(s): County Road Administration Board, 2404 Chandler Court S.W., Suite 240, Olympia, WA 98504-0913, on July 26, 2007, at 2:00 p.m.
Date of Intended Adoption: July 26, 2007.
Submit Written Comments to: Karen Pendleton, 2404 Chandler Court S.W., Suite 240, Olympia, WA 98504-0913, e-mail karen@crab.wa.gov, fax (360) 586-0386, by July 20, 2007.
Assistance for Persons with Disabilities: Contact Karen Pendleton by July 20, 2007, TTY (800) 833-6382 or (360) 753-5989.
Purpose of the Proposal and Its Anticipated Effects, Including Any Changes in Existing Rules: Chapter 136-400 WAC, Proposal for clean-up of current language to better explain process of county ferry capital improvement program.
Statutory Authority for Adoption: Chapter 36.79 RCW.
Rule is not necessitated by federal law, federal or state court decision.
Name of Proponent: [County road administration board], governmental.
Name of Agency Personnel Responsible for Drafting: Randy Hart, 2404 Chandler Court S.W., Suite 240, Olympia, WA 98504-0913, (360) 753-5989; Implementation: Karen Pendleton, 2404 Chandler Court S.W., Suite 240, Olympia, WA 98504-0913, (360) 753-5989; and Enforcement: Jay Weber, 2404 Chandler Court S.W., Suite 240, Olympia, WA 98504-0913, (360) 753-5989.
No small business economic impact statement has been prepared under chapter 19.85 RCW. Not applicable.
A cost-benefit analysis is not required under RCW 34.05.328. Not applicable.
May 21, 2007
Jay P. Weber
Executive Director
OTS-9725.2
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 99-01-021, filed 12/7/98,
effective 1/7/99)
WAC 136-400-010
Purpose and authority.
RCW 47.56.725(4)
provides that the county road administration board may
evaluate requests for county ferry capital improvement funds
by Pierce, Skagit, Wahkiakum, and Whatcom counties, and, if
approved by the board, submit said requests to the legislature
for funding. This chapter describes the manner in which the
county road administration board will implement the provisions
of the act.
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 36.79 RCW. 99-01-021, § 136-400-010, filed 12/7/98, effective 1/7/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 36.78.070 and 36.79.060. 96-17-013, § 136-400-010, filed 8/12/96, effective 9/12/96. Statutory Authority: 1991 c 310 § 1(4). 91-21-138 (Order 85), § 136-400-010, filed 10/23/91, effective 11/23/91.]
[Statutory Authority: 1991 c 310 § 1(4). 91-21-138 (Order 85), § 136-400-020, filed 10/23/91, effective 11/23/91.]
(1) Purchase of new vessels;
(2) Major vessel refurbishment (e.g., engines, structural steel, controls) that substantially extends the life of the vessel;
(3) Facility refurbishment/replacement (e.g., complete replacement, major rebuilding or redecking of a dock) that substantially extends the life of the facility;
(4) Installation of items that substantially improve county ferry facilities or operations;
(5) Construction of infrastructure that provides new or additional access or increases the capacity of terminal facilities; and/or
(6) Emergency repairs to correct damage to vessels or facilities caused by accidents or natural phenomena.
[Statutory Authority: 1991 c 310 § 1(4). 91-21-138 (Order 85), § 136-400-030, filed 10/23/91, effective 11/23/91.]
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 36.79 RCW. 99-01-021, § 136-400-040, filed 12/7/98, effective 1/7/99. Statutory Authority: 1991 c 310 § 1(4). 91-21-138 (Order 85), § 136-400-040, filed 10/23/91, effective 11/23/91.]
Project applications shall be submitted on application forms supplied by the county road administration board and shall include the following information:
(1) Project description and scope;
(2) Engineering analysis and cost estimate;
(3) Evidence of application for outside funding through the public works trust fund or any other available revenue source;
(4) Plan for utilization of outside funding that has been, will be, or may be awarded; and
(5) Comprehensive project amortization and cash flow schedules.
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 36.79 RCW. 99-01-021, § 136-400-050, filed 12/7/98, effective 1/7/99. Statutory Authority: 1991 c 310 § 1(4). 91-21-138 (Order 85), § 136-400-050, filed 10/23/91, effective 11/23/91.]
(1) Executive director of the county road administration
board((, WSDOT assistant secretary for transaid,));
(2) The director of highways and local programs or a designated representative appointed by the director of highways and local programs;
(3) A WSDOT marine division engineer((,)); and
(4) A public works department representatives from each of the four participating counties.
The county representatives shall serve as ex officio,
nonvoting members of the technical review committee. The
technical review committee shall ((recommend)) make
recommendations on approval of projects that have been
submitted in a timely manner and that:
(((1))) (a) Meet the applicable statutes and the
standards of this chapter; and
(((2))) (b) Adhere to commonly held engineering practices
and cost effectiveness.
The technical review committee's recommendations shall
((recommend)), as appropriate, include an appropriate local
match on a project-by-project basis based upon the
((availability of)) local ((matching funds)) calculation under
WAC 136-400-065. Written reports on each set of project
((recommended for approval)) recommendations shall be
submitted to the county road administration board no later
than thirty days prior to its regularly scheduled spring
meeting. Technical review committee meetings shall be
convened on an "as needed" basis by the executive director of
the county road administration board, who shall serve as
chairperson.
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 36.79 RCW. 99-01-021, § 136-400-060, filed 12/7/98, effective 1/7/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 36.78.070 and 36.79.060. 96-17-013, § 136-400-060, filed 8/12/96, effective 9/12/96. Statutory Authority: 1991 c 310 § 1(4). 91-21-138 (Order 85), § 136-400-060, filed 10/23/91, effective 11/23/91.]
For county ferry capital improvement funds capital requests less than or equal to one million dollars, the local match rate recommendation will be a minimum of zero percent of the requested amount, but not to exceed twenty-five percent of the requested amount, depending upon the demonstrated availability of local funds.
For county ferry capital improvement funds capital requests greater than one million dollars, the local match rate recommendation will be calculated as follows:
(1) If the county has not formed a ferry district as authorized by chapter 36.54 RCW, the minimum local match rate recommendation will be sixty percent of the requested amount.
(2) If the county has formed a ferry district as authorized by chapter 36.54 RCW, the minimum local match rate recommendation is ten percent of the requested amount, but not to exceed a maximum local match rate recommendation of fifty percent of the requested amount, based on two criteria:
(a) An additional zero to twenty percent based upon the requesting county's ferry district property valuation percentage at the time of application:
(i) County-wide district = zero percent additional local match.
(ii) Island-only district = twenty percent additional local match.
(b) An additional zero to twenty percent based upon the requesting county's ferry district levy percentage devoted to capital improvement at the time of application:
(i) One hundred percent ferry district levy to capital improvement = zero percent additional local match.
(ii) Less than fifty percent ferry district levy to capital improvement = twenty percent additional local match.
Recommendations of actual additional percentages will be determined using actual percentages of valuation areas and levy capital dedication.
[]
(1) Meet the applicable statutes and the standards of this chapter; and
(2) Adhere to commonly held engineering practices and cost effectiveness, specifying the amount of approved funding which it recommends for such projects.
((The board shall determine a local matching percentage
on a case-by-case basis, considering the availability of local
matching funds and the recommendation of the technical review
committee.)) Emergent projects may be considered by the
county road administration board at any time upon
recommendation by the executive director. On approved
projects, the board shall determine a local matching
percentage on a case-by-case basis, as described in WAC 136-400-065, considering the recommendation of the technical
review committee. The board shall require evidence that each
applicant has first sought funding through the public works
trust fund((, and)) or other available revenue sources.
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 36.79 RCW. 99-01-021, § 136-400-070, filed 12/7/98, effective 1/7/99. Statutory Authority: 1991 c 310 § 1(4). 91-21-138 (Order 85), § 136-400-070, filed 10/23/91, effective 11/23/91.]
The county road administration board shall, within ten days of the signing of the transportation budget, notify each county having an approved project of such approval and of the amount of county ferry capital improvement funding allocated to each approved project. The county road administration board shall offer each county a contract for each approved project setting forth the terms and conditions under which funds will be provided.
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 36.79 RCW. 99-01-021, § 136-400-080, filed 12/7/98, effective 1/7/99. Statutory Authority: 1991 c 310 § 1(4). 91-21-138 (Order 85), § 136-400-080, filed 10/23/91, effective 11/23/91.]
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 36.79 RCW. 99-01-021, § 136-400-090, filed 12/7/98, effective 1/7/99. Statutory Authority: 1991 c 310 § 1(4). 91-21-138 (Order 85), § 136-400-090, filed 10/23/91, effective 11/23/91.]
(1) ((Such contract shall be valid and binding (and the
county shall be entitled to receive ferry capital improvement
funds) only)) If such contract is signed and returned to the
county road administration board within forty-five days of its
mailing by the county road administration board, it shall be
valid and binding and the county shall be entitled to receive
county ferry capital improvement funds.
(2) The project will be constructed in accordance with:
(a) The information furnished to the county road administration board; and
(b) The plans and specifications prepared under the supervision of the county engineer.
(3) The county will notify the county road administration
board when a contract has been awarded ((and)), when
construction has started, and when the project has been
completed.
(4) The county road administration board will reimburse
counties based on ((the basis of)) progress vouchers received
and approved on individual projects, subject to the
availability of county ferry capital improvement funds
appropriated by the legislature.
(5) The county will reimburse the county road
administration board in the event that a project post audit
reveals ineligible expenditure of county ferry capital
improvement funds. Said funds will be returned to the
((county-wide)) county fuel tax account for distribution in
accordance with RCW 46.68.120.
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 36.79 RCW. 99-01-021, § 136-400-100, filed 12/7/98, effective 1/7/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 36.78.070 and 36.79.060. 96-17-013, § 136-400-100, filed 8/12/96, effective 9/12/96. Statutory Authority: 1991 c 310 § 1(4). 91-21-138 (Order 85), § 136-400-100, filed 10/23/91, effective 11/23/91.]
The county constructing each ferry capital improvement project may submit vouchers monthly as the work progresses and shall submit a final voucher after completion of each project for payment of the approved and funded share of the project cost.
The county road administration board shall approve such vouchers for payment to the county submitting the voucher. County ferry capital improvement fund warrants shall be transmitted directly to each county submitting a voucher. In the event that project funds remain unspent after the final project payment has been made, the unspent balance will be returned to the county-wide fuel tax account for distribution in accordance with RCW 46.68.120.
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 36.79 RCW. 99-01-021, § 136-400-110, filed 12/7/98, effective 1/7/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 36.78.070 and 36.79.060. 96-17-013, § 136-400-110, filed 8/12/96, effective 9/12/96. Statutory Authority: 1991 c 310 § 1(4). 91-21-138 (Order 85), § 136-400-110, filed 10/23/91, effective 11/23/91.]
An audit of any county ferry capital improvement project shall include, but not be limited to, a review of the county's compliance with the provisions of the statute and these rules. The audit shall also include a review of the financial accounting and reporting of those funds associated with and received for the county ferry capital improvement project.
In the event that an exception is noted in the audit report, the county road administration board shall evaluate the noted discrepancy. Discrepancies may be cause for the county road administration board to order the payback of improperly expended county ferry capital improvement funds as provided in the county road administration board/county contract. Any such funds returned by a county to the county road administration board shall be returned to the county-wide fuel tax account for distribution in accordance with RCW 46.68.120.
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 36.79 RCW. 99-01-021, § 136-400-120, filed 12/7/98, effective 1/7/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 36.78.070 and 36.79.060. 96-17-013, § 136-400-120, filed 8/12/96, effective 9/12/96. Statutory Authority: 1991 c 310 § 1(4). 91-21-138 (Order 85), § 136-400-120, filed 10/23/91, effective 11/23/91.]