RULES OF COURT
STATE SUPREME COURT
[April 1, 2020]
IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED TECHNICAL CORRECTION TO RAP 10.3(h)—CONTENT OF BRIEF
The Washington State Supreme Court, having recommended the adoption of the proposed technical correction to RAP 10.3(h)—Content of Brief, and the Court having considered the technical correction, and having determined that the proposed technical correction will aid in the prompt and orderly administration of justice;
Now, therefore, it is hereby
(a) That the technical correction as shown below is expeditiously adopted.
(b) That pursuant to the emergency provisions of GR 9 (j)(1), the technical correction will be published in the Washington Reports and will become effective upon publication.
dated at Olympia, Washington this 1st day of April, 2020.
Gordon McCloud, J.
CONTENT OF BRIEF
(a) – (g) [Unchanged.]
(h) Assignments of Error on Review of Certain Administrative Orders.
In addition to the assignments of error required by rule 10.3 (a)(34
) and 10.3(g), the brief of an appellant or respondent who is challenging an administrative adjudicative order under chapter 34.05
RCW shall set forth a separate concise statement of each error which a party contends was made by the agency issuing the order, together with the issues pertaining to each assignment of error.