WSR 04-15-088EMERGENCY RULES
SECRETARY OF STATE
[
Filed July 16, 2004,
8:24 a.m.
, effective July 16, 2004
]
Purpose: To clarify and define the purpose by which the
Secretary of State certifies voting systems and to add testing
procedures for new electronic voting equipment required by new
federal law.
Citation of Existing Rules Affected by this Order: Amending WAC 434-333-010 to 434-333-300, 434-230-175,
434-230-177, 434-253-085, and 434-261-045.
Statutory Authority for Adoption: RCW 29A.12.020.
Under RCW 34.05.350 the agency for good cause finds that immediate adoption, amendment, or repeal of a rule is necessary for the preservation of the public health, safety, or general welfare, and that observing the time requirements of notice and opportunity to comment upon adoption of a permanent rule would be contrary to the public interest; and that state or federal law or federal rule or a federal deadline for state receipt of federal funds requires immediate adoption of a rule.
Reasons for this Finding: New state law as of April 1,
2004, defined how primary ballots would be counted. Several
of the counties tabulation systems cannot count ballots
according to the new law without an upgrade to their systems.
This change in law necessitated a more detailed emergency
certification process in order to implement the primary this
year. New federal law (Help America Vote Act of 2002) also
requires the use of disability access devices at each poll
site. As counties move to these electronic systems, new
procedures for testing are needed in WAC.
Number of Sections Adopted in Order to Comply with Federal Statute:
New 14,
Amended 3,
Repealed 0;
Federal Rules or Standards:
New 0,
Amended 0,
Repealed 0;
or Recently Enacted State Statutes:
New 2,
Amended 3,
Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted at Request of a Nongovernmental Entity:
New 0,
Amended 0,
Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted on the Agency's Own Initiative:
New 0,
Amended 0,
Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted in Order to Clarify, Streamline, or Reform Agency Procedures:
New 17,
Amended 21,
Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted Using Negotiated Rule Making:
New 33,
Amended 27,
Repealed 0;
Pilot Rule Making:
New 0,
Amended 0,
Repealed 0;
or Other Alternative Rule Making:
New 0,
Amended 0,
Repealed 0.
Date Adopted: July 16, 2004.
Sam Reed
Secretary of State
OTS-7365.2
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-230-175
Direct recording electronic ballots.
The electronic record produced and counted by poll-site direct
recording electronic voting devices is the official record of
each vote for election purposes. The paper record produced as
a requirement in WAC 434-333-020(6) must be stored and
maintained for use only in the following specified
circumstances:
(1) In the event of a mandatory hand recount of votes
under RCW 29A.64.020;
(2) In the event of a requested recount under RCW 29A.64.010;
(3) By order of the county canvassing board; and
(4) By order of a court of competent jurisdiction.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-230-177
Preservation of paper records of
poll-site based electronic voting devices.
The paper records
produced by poll-site direct recording electronic voting
devices are subject to all of the requirements of chapter 29A.60 RCW for ballot handling, preservation, reconciliation,
transit to the counting center, and storage. The paper
records must be preserved in the same manner and for the same
period of time as ballots.
[]
OTS-7366.2
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-253-085
Voter leaving an electronic voting
device during voting process.
A voter voting on a poll-site
based electronic voting system may not leave the device during
the voting process except to verify his or her ballot, or to
request assistance from the precinct election officers, until
the voting process is completed.
[]
OTS-7367.2
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-261-045
Procedures before counting sessions
begin.
Before the first ballot counting session in each
election, a report must be produced demonstrating that the
system contains no vote data before commencement of counting
ballots. At the completion of each ballot counting session,
the ballot counting system must produce a report of the
results compiled that includes date and time information.
Before commencing any additional ballot counting session, a
report of the results contained in the system must be produced
that includes date and time information. This report must be
compared with the report produced at the end of the previous
ballot counting session to ensure that no changes have been
made to the vote data in the interim period. This comparison
must be performed in the presence of political party observers
if representatives have been appointed by their respective
political parties and are present at the time of comparison.
This procedure must be employed for subsequent counting
sessions. Nothing in this section precludes the county
auditor from zeroing individual devices in subsequent counting
sessions if a report is created after each session and before
the next, with the results being merged into the total.
[]
OTS-7368.2
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-010
Certification of vote tallying
equipment.
All voting systems, voting devices, and vote
tallying systems must be certified and approved by the
secretary of state before they can be used ((or sold)) in
Washington state. In order for a system to be certified in
Washington state, it must meet the applicable federal
((Elections Commission)) standards, must comply with
Washington state law, and must be certified and in use in at
least one other state.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-010, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080,
29.04.210, 29.36.150 and 29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as
§ 434-334-010, filed 10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory
Authority: 1990 c 59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-010, filed 6/2/92,
effective 7/3/92.]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-013
Voting systems review board.
Certification reviews and recommendations may be made to the
secretary by the voting systems review board. The voting
systems review board will include independent expert(s) in
computer science or information technology, recognized
expert(s) in election administration, and representative(s) of
the public at large. The members of the review board will be
appointed to a two-year term by the secretary of state
beginning in January 2005. Traveling expenses and any
necessary lodging will be provided to the local election
official by the secretary. The duties of the voting systems
review board will include, but not be limited to: Conducting
a review of initial system applications as outlined in WAC 434-333-035; reviewing and examining the equipment (ref. WAC 434-333-045 to 434-333-055); and chairing the public hearing
(WAC 434-333-060).
[]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-015
Initial application for certification.
((A vendor may apply to the secretary of state at any time
during the year. However,)) Any person or corporation
(applicant) owning or representing a voting system or a vote
tabulating system, part of a system, equipment, materials or
procedure may apply in writing to the secretary of state for
certification between December 1st and May 30th each year.
Certification examinations and hearings will only be performed
in the period between ((the end of the legislative session))
January 1st and ((August)) July 15th of each year. The
application shall include at least the following information: (1) Information about the vendor, ((location, customer
lists, and product lists)) business address, customer
references, and list of election products.
(2) Information about the product that is being reviewed,
version numbers, release numbers, operating and maintenance
manuals, training materials, technical and operational
specifications((, installed customer lists, etc)).
(3) ((The vendor shall include certification documents
for all other states that have certified the equipment.
(4) The vendor shall provide reports for all tests
conducted, on the product being reviewed for certification, by
any independent testing authority or laboratory. The
independent authority must meet the criteria established by
the Federal Elections Commission for such agents.
(5) The vendor shall provide documentation proving that
the product meets the Federal Elections Commission Voting
Equipment guidelines.
(6) The vendor shall identify what portion of the
software remains proprietary.
(7) A monetary deposit as described in WAC 434-34-025
[434-333-025].)) Documentation of all other
states that have tested, certified and used the equipment in a
binding election. The information included should state how
long the system has been used in the state and must include
version numbers of the operating system, software, and
firmware in use, date and jurisdiction of use in a binding
election and must disclose any reports compiled by state or
local government concerning the performance of the system.
(4) A monetary deposit as described in WAC 434-333-050.
(5) A copy of a letter from the applicant, to each
independent testing authority (ITA), which:
(a) Directs the ITA to send a copy of the completed ITA
qualification report to the secretary of state;
(b) Authorizes the ITA to discuss testing procedures and
findings with the secretary of state; and
(c) Authorizes the ITA to allow the secretary of state to
review all records of any qualification testing conducted on
the voting system or its components.
(6) A technical data package (TDP) conforming to the 2002
FEC Federal Voting Systems Standards (FVSS), Vol. II, Sec. 2
standards that includes:
(a) Identification of all COTS hardware and software
products and communications services used in the operation of
the voting system (ref. FVSS, 2.2.1.e).
(b) System functionality description (ref. FVSS, 2.3).
(c) System security specification (ref. FVSS, 2.6).
(d) System operations procedures (ref. FVSS, 2.8).
(e) System maintenance procedures (ref. FVSS, 2.9).
(f) Personnel deployment and training requirements (ref.
FVSS, 2.10).
(g) Configuration management plan (ref. FVSS, 2.11).
(h) System change notes (if applicable, ref. FVSS, 2.13).
(i) System change list, if any, of modifications
currently in development.
(j) System usability testing report.
(7) The source code of an electronic voting system must
be placed in escrow in the state of Washington and be
accessible by the secretary of state under prescribed
conditions allowing source code review for system
verification.
(8) Identification of all documents, or portions of
documents, containing proprietary information not approved for
public release. The secretary of state shall agree to use
proprietary information solely for the purpose of analyzing
and testing the system, and shall agree to refrain from
otherwise using the proprietary information or disclosing it
to any other person or agency without the prior written
consent of the vendor, to the extent permitted by law unless
disclosure is legally compelled.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-015, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080,
29.04.210, 29.36.150 and 29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as
§ 434-334-015, filed 10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory
Authority: 1990 c 59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-015, filed 6/2/92,
effective 7/3/92.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-020
((Additional information and equipment
required.)) Voting system requirements.
((The vendor shall
provide a working model of the equipment that is being
reviewed to the secretary of state for the duration of the
review. The secretary of state may, at the expense of the
vendor, contract with independent testing authorities or
laboratories, experts in mechanical engineering, electrical
engineering, or data processing while examining the
equipment.)) No voting device or its component software may be
certified by the secretary of state unless it: (1) Secures to the voter secrecy in the act of voting;
(2) Permits the voter to vote for any person for any
office and upon any measure that he or she has the right to
vote for;
(3) Permits the voter to vote for all the candidates of
one party or in part for the candidates of one or more other
parties;
(4) Correctly registers all votes cast for any and all
persons and for or against any and all measures;
(5) Provides that a vote for more than one candidate
cannot be cast by one single operation of the voting device or
vote tally system except when voting for president and
vice-president of the United States;
(6) Beginning on January 1, 2006, a poll site-based
electronic voting system, at the time of voting, produces a
machine countable paper record for each vote that may be
reviewed by any voter before finalizing his or her vote, as a
part of the voting process;
(7) The paper record of each electronic vote may not be
removed by the voter, but may be accepted or rejected. If the
device is programmed to display the ballot in multiple
languages, the paper record produced must be printed in the
language used by each voter;
(8) Except for functions or capabilities unique to this
state, has been tested and approved by the appropriate
independent testing authority approved by the federal election
assistance commission or its statutory successor;
(9) Correctly counts votes on ballots on which the proper
number of votes have been marked for any office or issue;
(10) Ignores votes marked for any office or issue where
more than the allowable number of votes have been marked, but
correctly counts the properly voted portions of the ballot;
(11) Accumulates a count of the specific number of
ballots tallied for each precinct, total votes by candidate
for each office, and total votes for and against each issue of
the ballot in that precinct;
(12) Produces precinct and cumulative totals in printed
form;
(13) Ballot counting systems must be secured physically
and electronically against unauthorized access;
(14) Ballot counting systems must not be connected to, or
operated on, any electronic network including, but not limited
to, internal office networks, the internet, or the world wide
web;
(15) A network may be used as an internal, integral part
of the ballot counting system but that network must not be
connected to any other network, the internet, or the world
wide web;
(16) Wireless communications may not be used in any way
in a ballot counting system;
(17) All elements of the ballot counting systems must be
capable of being secured with lock and seal when not in use;
(18) Transfer of information from the ballot counting
system may be made by telephonic transmission only after the
creation of disk, tape, or other physical means of
communication;
(19) All electronic voting systems must meet Washington
state disability access standards;
(20) All electronic voting systems software in escrow
must be the exact same as that tested and certified by the
federal independent testing authority and may be verified by
matching the system's digital software signature, when
available.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-020, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080,
29.04.210, 29.36.150 and 29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as
§ 434-334-020, filed 10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory
Authority: 1990 c 59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-020, filed 6/2/92,
effective 7/3/92.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-025
((Vendor deposit for examination
expenses.)) Closing an incomplete application.
((The vendor
shall pay the secretary of state a deposit to reimburse the
cost of any contract for consultation or any other
unrecoverable costs associated with the examination of a
voting system or component.)) Upon receipt of an application,
the secretary of state shall examine the application for
completeness. If the application is not complete, the
secretary of state shall notify the applicant in writing
within thirty days of the information required to complete the
application. The secretary of state will deem the application
to be closed, if thirty days after notifying the vendor in
writing of an incomplete application, the secretary of state
has not received all information requested from the vendor.
Closure of an application shall not prevent the applicant from
submitting a new application to the secretary of state.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-025, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080,
29.04.210, 29.36.150 and 29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as
§ 434-334-025, filed 10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory
Authority: 1990 c 59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-025, filed 6/2/92,
effective 7/3/92.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-035
((Public hearing.)) Elements to be
considered in the review of an application.
((Only after the
secretary of state is satisfied that the equipment being
examined meets all of the guidelines for certification shall a
public hearing be scheduled. The public hearing will be
scheduled at the convenience of the secretary of state. At
the hearing the vendor will be expected to demonstrate the
equipment and explain its function. The vendor will be
expected to answer questions from the secretary of state staff
as well as any other persons in attendance. The vendor may be
asked to submit answers in writing if the secretary of state
is not satisfied with the completeness of answers given at the
hearing.)) Upon receipt of a completed application, the voting
systems review board shall evaluate the application. This
evaluation shall include, but is not limited to: (1) A review of Revised Code of Washington sections which
address the application (chapter 29A.40 RCW);
(2) A review of applicable federal standards which
address the application;
(3) A copy of the approved qualification test results
released directly to the secretary of state by the federally
approved independent testing authority (ITA);
(4) A review, if applicable, of reports or other
materials from prior hearings on the proposed system,
procedure, or modification either in whole or in part;
(5) A review, if applicable, of any procedures manuals,
guidelines or other materials adopted for use with the system
addressed by the application;
(6) A review of any effect the application will have on
the security of the voting system;
(7) A review of any effect the application will have on
the accuracy of the voting system;
(8) A review of any effect the application will have on
the ease and convenience with which voters use the system;
(9) A review of any effect the application will have on
the timeliness of vote reporting; and
(10) A review of any effect the application will have on
the overall efficiency of the voting system.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-035, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080,
29.04.210, 29.36.150 and 29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as
§ 434-334-035, filed 10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory
Authority: 1990 c 59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-035, filed 6/2/92,
effective 7/3/92.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-045
((Modification of certified equipment,
guidelines for reexamination.)) Additional information and
equipment required.
((Any modification, change, or
improvement to a voting system or component that impairs its
accuracy, efficiency, or capacity or extends its function may
require examination or certification before it may be used or
sold in Washington state.)) The vendor shall provide a working
model of the equipment that is being reviewed to the voting
systems review board for the duration of the review. The
board may, at the expense of the vendor, contract with
independent testing authorities or laboratories, experts in
mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, or data
processing while examining the equipment.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-045, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080,
29.04.210, 29.36.150 and 29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as
§ 434-334-045, filed 10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory
Authority: 1990 c 59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-045, filed 6/2/92,
effective 7/3/92.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-050
((Application for certification or
examination of modified voting systems or devices.)) Vendor
deposit for examination expenses.
((A vendor may apply to the
secretary of state for the review of a modification of an
existing certified system at any time during the year. Evaluation of the need for recertification or examination will
occur at the convenience of the secretary of state. If
possible the secretary of state will focus review and
examination on the modified component of the equipment or
system. If the system, or its component, is found to be
sufficiently modified that it requires examination or
recertification, the process for original certification shall
be followed. Certification examinations and hearings will
only be performed in the period between the end of the
legislative session and August 15th of each year. The
application for examination of a modification shall include at
least the following information: (1) Information about the vendor, location, customer
lists, and product lists.
(2) Information about the product that is being reviewed,
version numbers, release numbers, operating and maintenance
manuals, training materials, technical and operational
specifications, installed customer lists, etc.
(3) The vendor shall include certification documents for
all other states that have certified the equipment.
(4) The vendor shall provide reports for all tests
conducted, on the product being reviewed for certification, by
any independent testing authority or laboratory. The
independent authority must meet the criteria established by
the Federal Elections Commission for such agents.
(5) The vendor shall provide documentation proving that
the product meets the Federal Elections Commission voting
equipment guidelines.
(6) A document prepared by the vendor that describes in
complete operational and technical detail all differences
between the originally certified equipment or system and the
modified equipment or system.
(7) The vendor shall identify what portion of the
software remains proprietary.
(8) A monetary deposit as described in WAC 434-34-025
[434-333-025].)) The vendor shall pay the
secretary of state a deposit to reimburse the cost of any
contract for consultation or any other unrecoverable costs
associated with the examination of a voting system or
component.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-050, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080,
29.04.210, 29.36.150 and 29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as
§ 434-334-050, filed 10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory
Authority: 1990 c 59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-050, filed 6/2/92,
effective 7/3/92.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-055
((Acceptance testing of voting systems
and)) Examination of equipment.
((Whenever a county acquires
a new system or an upgrade to an existing system that has been
certified by the secretary of state, the county must perform
acceptance tests of the equipment before it may be used to
count votes at any election. The equipment must be operating
correctly, pass all tests and must be substantially the same
as the equipment certified by the secretary of state. The
minimum testing standards are described as follows: (1) The model number, version number, release number, and
any other number, name or description that identifies the
product must be the same as the identifying numbers for the
product that has been certified by the secretary of state.
(2) The county must receive all manuals, and training
necessary for the proper operation of the system.
(3) The county shall perform a series of functional and
programming tests that will test all functions of the ballot
counting system. This must include processing a substantial
number of test ballots of various prepunch or ballot codes,
including split precincts, rotated races, multiple candidates,
precinct committee officer local races, cumulative reports,
precinct reports, canvass reports, and any other tests the
county elections authority finds necessary.)) The examination
consists of a series of functional application tests designed
to insure that the system or equipment meets all guidelines
and laws. The examination may include an additional
independent testing authority test if the voting systems
review board is not satisfied with the documentation made
available by the vendor. The examination shall include the
set-up and conduct of two mock elections. The vendor shall
provide ballot materials and programming to create these
elections.
(1) The first election shall replicate an even-year
primary, using consolidated ballots for the major political
parties and including PCO contests.
(2) The second election shall replicate an odd-year
general election, to test the use of split precincts.
All test elections shall feature at least ten precincts
with at least ten ballots in each precinct. The tests must
include ballots of various ballot codes, including multiple
candidates, cumulative reports, precinct reports, and canvass
reports, as detailed in the test plan provided by the
secretary of state.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-055, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-055, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080, 29.04.210, 29.36.150 and
29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as § 434-334-055, filed
10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory Authority: 1990 c
59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-055, filed 6/2/92, effective 7/3/92.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-060
((Inclusion of the federal election
commission standards for voting equipment.)) Public hearing.
((The Federal Election Commission standards concerning voting
systems and software escrow are hereby included by reference
except where otherwise modified by these rules and the Revised
Code of Washington.)) The public hearing will be scheduled at
the convenience of the secretary of state. At the hearing the
vendor will be expected to demonstrate the equipment and
explain its function. The vendor will be available to answer
questions from the voting systems review board as well as any
other persons in attendance. The vendor may be asked to
submit answers in writing if the voting systems review board
is not satisfied with the completeness of answers given at the
hearing.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-060, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080,
29.04.210, 29.36.150 and 29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as
§ 434-334-060, filed 10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory
Authority: 1990 c 59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-060, filed 6/2/92,
effective 7/3/92.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-065
((Logic and accuracy test conduct.))
Issuance of certification.
((The county shall provide
adequate personnel to properly operate the ballot counting
equipment. Whenever possible, the equipment should be
operated during the test by the same persons who will be
responsible for the ballot count on election day. If any
error in programming or mechanical function is detected, the
cause shall be determined and corrected, and an errorless test
completed before the primary or election.)) After the
secretary of state is satisfied that the system meets all
requirements, a report or certification will be issued.
Notification of certification will be sent by the secretary of
state to all counties within thirty days of the issuance of
certification. If the system fails to meet any of the
requirements, the vendor will be notified and given thirty
days to submit an improved version of the system. The
improved version will be tested as if it had not been seen by
the office of the secretary of state.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-065, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-065, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080, 29.04.210, 29.36.150 and
29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as § 434-334-065, filed
10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory Authority: 1990 c
59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-065, filed 6/2/92, effective 7/3/92.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-070
((Logic and accuracy test observers.))
Certification may be conditioned.
((The official logic and
accuracy test shall be observed by at least one representative
of each major political party, if representatives have been
appointed by the parties and are present at the test. The
party observers shall be instructed as election observers, by
the county auditor. The official logic and accuracy test
shall be open to candidates, the press, and the public. If
any observer hinders or disturbs the logic and accuracy test
process, the county auditor or representative may remove that
observer from the test area. An observer who has been
removed from a logic and accuracy test may also be barred from
future tests. The absence of observers shall not delay or
stop the test from being conducted.)) Any certification may
contain additional requirements of one or more actions or
procedures, as determined by the review of the application and
equipment.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-070, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-070, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080, 29.04.210, 29.36.150 and
29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as § 434-334-070, filed
10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory Authority: 1990 c
59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-070, filed 6/2/92, effective 7/3/92.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-075
((Logic and accuracy testing of voting
systems and equipment -- State primary and general election.))
Modification of certified equipment, guidelines for
administrative approval.
((At least three days before each
state primary or general election the office of the secretary
of state shall provide for a test of the programming for the
vote tallying system to be used at that primary or election. The test should verify that the system will correctly count
the votes cast for all candidates and all measures appearing
on the ballot. The test shall also verify that the machine(s)
is/are functioning to specifications.)) The secretary of state
may approve an application for modification of certified
equipment administratively where he or she determines that the
application does not: (1) Materially affect the lawful conduct, accuracy,
efficiency, capacity or security of elections;
(2) Materially affect the convenience to the voter of the
elections process; or
(3) Otherwise result in significant modification to
existing procedures in extending the equipment's
functionality.
An application approved administratively will not require
examination by the voting systems review board.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-075, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-075, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080, 29.04.210, 29.36.150 and
29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as § 434-334-075, filed
10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory Authority: 1990 c
59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-075, filed 6/2/92, effective 7/3/92.]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-080
Application for administrative approval
of modified voting systems or devices.
The application for
review of a modification of an existing certified system shall
include at least the following information: (1) Information about the vendor.
(2) Information about the product that is being reviewed,
version numbers, and release numbers. The application must
also highlight all changes to the operating and maintenance
manuals, training materials, and technical and operational
specifications required by the modifications being reviewed to
completely update them to the current version.
(3) The vendor shall include certification documents for
all other states that have certified the equipment with the
modifications.
(4) The vendor shall provide reports for all tests
conducted, on the product modification(s) being reviewed for
certification, by any independent testing authority or
laboratory. The independent authority must meet the criteria
established by the election assistance commission for such
agents.
(5) The vendor shall provide documentation proving that
the product with the modification(s) meets the applicable
federal voting equipment guidelines.
(6) A document prepared by the vendor that describes in
complete operational and technical detail all differences
between the originally certified equipment or system and the
modified equipment or system.
(7) A monetary deposit as described in WAC 434-333-050.
[]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-085
((Logic and accuracy test scheduling and
preparation -- State primary and general election.))
Recertification of modified voting systems or devices.
((Prior to each state primary and general election the office
of the secretary of state will prepare a schedule of logic and
accuracy tests. The office of the secretary of state will
notify each county of the date and time of their test at least
thirty days before the primary or election. The county is
responsible for preparing the counting system and testing it
before the actual logic and accuracy test. The ballot
counting system shall be fully programmed, cleaned,
maintained, tested and functional before the official logic
and accuracy test. The county shall notify the parties, the
press, the public, and candidates of the date and time of the
test.)) If the system, or its component, is found to be
sufficiently modified under the guidelines of WAC 434-333-075
that it requires an examination of the equipment by the voting
systems review board and a public hearing, the secretary of
state will notify the applicant in writing that the applicant
must initiate the certification process outlined in WAC 434-333-015 through 434-333-065.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-085, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-085, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080, 29.04.210, 29.36.150 and
29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as § 434-334-085, filed
10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory Authority: 1990 c
59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-085, filed 6/2/92, effective 7/3/92.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-090
((Logic and accuracy test
certification -- State primary and general election.))
Restricted period.
((The county auditor or deputy, and, if
present, the office of the secretary of state representative
and any political party observers shall certify that the test
has been conducted in accordance with RCW 29.33.350. Copies
of this certification shall be retained by the secretary of
state and the county auditor. All programming materials, test
results, and test ballots shall be securely sealed until the
day of the primary or election. These items may be sealed and
stored separately. If, for any reason, any changes are made to the ballot
counting programming after the official logic and accuracy
test, an emergency logic and accuracy test must be conducted
pursuant to WAC 434-334-082 [434-333-082].)) No modification, change,
or other alteration to a voting or vote tabulating material,
equipment, or component shall receive administrative approval
or certification from July 15th until November 30th.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-090, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 00-10-009, § 434-334-090, filed 4/21/00, effective 5/22/00;
99-08-115, § 434-334-090, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080, 29.04.210, 29.36.150 and
29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as § 434-334-090, filed
10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory Authority: 1990 c
59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-090, filed 6/2/92, effective 7/3/92.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-095
((Logic and accuracy testing of voting
systems and equipment -- Special elections.)) Emergency
approval.
((At least three days before each special election
the programming for the vote tallying system to be used at
that election shall be tested for logic and accuracy. The
test should verify that the system will correctly count the
votes cast for all candidates and all measures appearing on
the ballot. The test shall be conducted by processing a
preaudited group of ballots, marked with a predetermined
number of votes, for each candidate and for or against each
measure. For each office where there are two or more
candidates and for each measure there will be an undervote and
overvote.)) Emergency approval for modifications of an
existing voting or vote tabulating system, or equipment may be
obtained from the secretary of state during the restricted
period if failure to modify the system will materially affect
the lawful conduct, efficiency, accuracy, or security of the
upcoming election.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-095, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-095, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080, 29.04.210, 29.36.150 and
29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as § 434-334-095, filed
10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory Authority: 1990 c
59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-095, filed 6/2/92, effective 7/3/92.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-100
((Logic and accuracy test deck
preparation -- Special elections.)) Application information for
emergency approval.
((When a new test deck is required under
WAC 434-334-095 [434-333-095], the test deck or decks used
for the official logic and accuracy test will be prepared by
the county elections office.)) During the restricted period,
an applicant may apply in writing to the secretary of state
for emergency approval of a modification of an existing
certified system. The application must include a complete
description of all modifications to the system that are
required. The application must also include a description of
how failure to modify the system will materially affect the
lawful conduct, efficiency, accuracy, or security of the
upcoming election. If the secretary of state determines that
an emergency situation exists after a review of the
application, the examination, and testing of proposed
modifications will be expedited by the secretary of state to
meet the needs of the upcoming election. The emergency
approval will waive the requirement that the modifications be
certified by the national ITA pending final approval.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-100, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-100, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080, 29.04.210, 29.36.150 and
29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as § 434-334-100, filed
10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory Authority: 1990 c
59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-100, filed 6/2/92, effective 7/3/92.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-105
((Logic and accuracy test scheduling and
preparation -- Special election.)) Final approval.
((The county
is responsible for preparing the counting system and testing
it before the official logic and accuracy test. The ballot
counting system shall be fully programmed, cleaned and
maintained, tested, and functional before the official logic
and accuracy test. The county shall notify the parties, the
press, the public, and candidates of the date and time of the
official logic and accuracy test.)) The applicant must submit
an application that incorporates a permanent fix to the
problem covered by the emergency approval in time to be
approved under the normal application guidelines (ref. WAC 434-333-075) the following year. This application will be
reviewed under the application guidelines.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-105, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-105, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080, 29.04.210, 29.36.150 and
29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as § 434-334-105, filed
10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory Authority: 1990 c
59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-105, filed 6/2/92, effective 7/3/92.]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-107
Provisional approval of modifications
required for the 2004 Washington partisan primary.
The
secretary of state has been informed by the counties and the
vendors that some or all of the voting systems currently
certified and in use must be modified prior to use in the
upcoming partisan primary in order to use those voting systems
to meet the requirements of the partisan primary passed in the
2004 legislative session. In order to insure the lawful
conduct, efficiency, accuracy, and security of the upcoming
partisan primary and general election, the secretary of state
will adopt the following procedures: (1) The requirement that the modifications be certified
by national ITA will be waived (ref. WAC 434-333-020(8)).
(2) The state shall perform a series of functional and
programming tests on the modified software that will test all
functions of the ballot counting system. Tests will simulate
both the partisan primary and general election. The tests
will include all possible combinations of choices that a voter
may make to select a party choice on the consolidated ballot.
The tests will include processing a substantial number of test
ballots of various ballot codes covering all precincts,
including split precincts, multiple candidates, precinct
committee officer local races, cumulative reports, precinct
reports, and canvass reports.
(3) Counties using provisionally certified software will
conduct a post-election logic and accuracy test of their
system.
(4) Where a county is using DRE equipment as a component
of the voting system, they must follow the provisions of WAC 434-333-250 through 434-333-280.
(5) The approval for use of the modified system will be
valid only for the 2004 primary and general election.
(6) If applicable, the vendor will incorporate the
modifications into the next release of their system to be
certified by the national ITA and reviewed under the initial
application guidelines (ref. WAC 434-333-015) as early as
possible in 2005 but no later than July 15, 2005.
[]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-110
((Logic and accuracy test
certification -- Special election.)) Judicial review of agency
action.
((The county auditor or deputy and any political
party observers, if present, shall certify that the test has
been conducted in accordance with RCW 29.33.350. Copies of
this certification shall be retained by the county auditor. All programming materials, official test results, and test
ballots shall be securely sealed until the day of the primary
or election. These items may be sealed and stored separately. If, for any reason, any changes are made to the ballot
counting programming after the official logic and accuracy
test, an emergency logic and accuracy test must be conducted
pursuant to WAC 434-334-082 [434-333-082].)) Any of the following
decisions entered pursuant to this chapter are final decisions
of the secretary as to which no further review by the agency
is available, subject to judicial review pursuant to chapter 34.05 RCW:
(1) The issuance or denial of certification pursuant to
WAC 434-333-065;
(2) The issuance or denial of administrative approval of
a modification pursuant to WAC 434-333-075;
(3) The issuance or denial of recertification of a
modified system or component pursuant to WAC 434-333-085; and
(4) A final order entered pursuant to WAC 434-333-105.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-110, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 00-10-009, § 434-334-110, filed 4/21/00, effective 5/22/00;
99-08-115, § 434-334-110, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080, 29.04.210, 29.36.150 and
29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as § 434-334-110, filed
10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory Authority: 1990 c
59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-110, filed 6/2/92, effective 7/3/92.]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-115
Acceptance testing of voting systems and
equipment.
Whenever a county acquires a new system or an
upgrade to an existing system that has been certified by the
secretary of state, the county must perform acceptance tests
of the equipment before it may be used to count votes at any
election. The equipment must be operating correctly, pass all
tests and must be the same as the equipment certified by the
secretary of state. The minimum testing standards are
described as follows: (1) The model number, version number, release number, and
any other number, name or description that identifies the
product must be the same as the identifying numbers for the
product that has been certified by the secretary of state.
(2) The county must receive all manuals, and training
necessary for the proper operation of the system.
(3) The county shall perform a series of functional and
programming tests that will test all functions of the ballot
counting system. This must include processing a substantial
number of test ballots of various ballot codes, including
split precincts, multiple candidates, precinct committee
officer local races, cumulative reports, precinct reports,
canvass reports, and any other tests the county elections
authority finds necessary.
(4) The county auditor shall certify the results of
acceptance testing to the secretary of state, including
version numbers of hardware, software, and firmware installed
and tested.
[]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-120
((Logic and accuracy test
preparation -- State primary and general election -- Punchcard
systems.)) Inclusion of the federal standards for voting
equipment.
((The test deck or decks used for the official
logic and accuracy test are maintained by the county auditor. Information describing the candidates, offices, ballot
formats, ballot positions, pages applicable or planning
matrix, accurate list of prepunches, list of the number of
appearances of each office and each rotation, and all other
information required to select the test precincts and predict
the results must be available to the office of the secretary
of state at the very latest by the 30th day prior to the
primary or election. If a county is delayed due to
complications related to lawsuits or late filing periods, the
county should advise the office of the secretary of state
before the 30th day prior to the primary or election.)) The
2002 election assistance commission standards concerning
voting systems and software escrow are hereby included by
reference except where otherwise modified by these rules and
the Revised Code of Washington. After January 1, 2005, in
order to get administrative approval of modifications to
systems currently certified under 1990 standards, the entire
voting system must be tested and approved under the 2002
standards.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-120, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, recodified as § 434-334-120, filed 4/7/99,
effective 5/8/99; 99-08-115, § 434-334-080, filed 4/7/99,
effective 5/8/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.04.080,
29.04.210, 29.36.150 and 29.79.200. 97-21-045, recodified as
§ 434-334-080, filed 10/13/97, effective 11/13/97. Statutory
Authority: 1990 c 59. 92-12-083, § 434-34-080, filed 6/2/92,
effective 7/3/92.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-125
((Punchcard test deck maintenance and
storage.)) Decertification of voting systems and vote
tabulating systems.
((Each county employing a punchcard
balloting system shall maintain a permanent deck of logic and
accuracy test ballots. The test ballots shall contain a
distinct pattern of votes. The deck may be used for all
official logic and accuracy tests and for programming tests
conducted in preparation for official logic and accuracy
tests. The permanent test deck shall be maintained in secure
storage except when being used for actual testing.)) (1) The
secretary of state may decertify a voting system or vote
tabulating system or any component thereof and withdraw
authority for its future use or sale in Washington if, at any
time after certification: (a) He or she determines that the system or component
fails to meet the standards set forth in state or federal law,
including, but not limited to, this chapter; or
(b) He or she determines that the system or component was
materially misrepresented in the certification application; or
(c) He or she determines that the vendor has installed
unauthorized modifications to the certified software or
hardware.
(2) The secretary shall provide notice of the
decertification in writing to the original applicant for
certification of the system or component or successor (if
known), and to all county auditors, and shall also post it to
the secretary's website. The notice shall specify the reasons
why the certification of the system is being rescinded and the
date on which the decertification is to become effective. The
effective date shall not be less than five days after issuance
of the notice, but may be delayed to any date the secretary
finds reasonable.
(3) The original applicant or its successor or any county
auditor may request in writing that the secretary reconsider
the decision to decertify within thirty days after the
issuance of the notice or at least ninety days prior to the
effective date of the decertification, whichever is later.
(4) Reconsideration of the decision to decertify shall
proceed as an adjudicative proceeding pursuant to chapter 34.05 RCW.
(a) The secretary adopts the model rules of procedure as
set forth in chapter 10-08 WAC, except as they may be
inconsistent with this chapter. The proceeding may be
conducted as an emergency adjudicative proceeding pursuant to
RCW 34.05.479 if the secretary finds that immediate action is
required to preserve the integrity of the electoral process.
(b) The secretary shall designate the presiding officer.
(c) The decertification is suspended pending resolution
of the administrative proceeding, unless the secretary finds,
following notice and opportunity for written or oral input
(which may be expedited), that the public interest requires
that the decertification not be suspended.
(d) The argument in favor of decertification may be
presented by an employee of the secretary or by an assistant
attorney general. Other parties may be represented by a
certified election administrator or by any person permitted to
appear by WAC 434-180-560.
(e) An order issued by the presiding officer shall be
regarded as an initial order unless the secretary, assistant
secretary, deputy secretary, or director of elections
presides, in which case the decision of the presiding officer
shall be final and no further review is available within the
agency.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-125, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-125, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99.]
OTS-7376.1
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-130
((Punchcard test precinct
selection -- State primary and general elections.)) Definition
of official logic and accuracy test.
((Prior to the official
logic and accuracy test the office of the secretary of state
shall review the election materials provided by the county and
select a representative sample of precincts and ballot styles
sufficient to cover all offices and issues contained in the
election. The representative sample shall constitute the
official logic and accuracy test. This provision does not
limit the ability of the office of the secretary of state to
conduct a complete test of every precinct if conditions
warrant.)) As used in this chapter, "official logic and
accuracy test" means the test performed in accordance with RCW 29.33.350 (29A.12.130).
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-130, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-130, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-135
((Punchcard testing requirements prior
to official logic and accuracy test.)) Logic and accuracy test
conduct.
((Prior to the official logic and accuracy test,
each county employing a punchcard balloting system shall
thoroughly test all programming and system components. The
test must at least verify the office programming by thoroughly
testing each individual office, test the ballot style logic to
insure that all offices are included in the intended precincts
and combinations, and verify that the program is accumulating
all offices. The county auditor or deputy shall certify that
these tests have been completed prior to the official logic
and accuracy test.)) The county shall provide adequate
personnel to properly operate the ballot counting equipment.
Whenever possible, the equipment should be operated during the
test by the same persons who will be responsible for the
ballot count on election day. If any error in programming or
mechanical function is detected, the cause shall be determined
and corrected, and an errorless test completed before the
primary or election.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-135, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-135, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-140
((Definitions.)) Logic and accuracy test
observers.
((For optical scan voting systems: (1) "Voting response area" means the area defined by
ballot instructions which the voter places their mark to
indicate their vote.
(2) "Scanning area" means the portions of each ballot
that the system scans in order to read the vote marks made by
voters.
(3) "Ballot marking code" means the coded patterns
printed on ballots intended to identify ballot styles to the
ballot counting system.)) The official logic and accuracy test
shall be observed by at least one representative of each major
political party if representatives have been appointed by the
parties and are present at the test. The party observers
shall be instructed as election observers, by the county
auditor. The official logic and accuracy test shall be open
to candidates, the press, and the public. If any observer
hinders or disturbs the logic and accuracy test process, the
county auditor or representative may remove that observer from
the test area. An observer who has been removed from a logic
and accuracy test may also be barred from future tests. The
absence of observers shall not delay or stop the test from
being conducted.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-140, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 00-10-009, § 434-334-140, filed 4/21/00, effective 5/22/00;
99-08-115, § 434-334-140, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-145
((Logic and accuracy test deck
preparation -- State primary and general election -- Optical scan
systems.)) Logic and accuracy testing of voting systems and
equipment -- State primary and general election.
((The test
deck or decks used for the official logic and accuracy test
for optical scan systems may, at the discretion of the
secretary of state, be prepared by either the office of the
secretary of state, the county, or the vendor. Information
describing the candidates, offices, ballot formats, ballot
positions, ballot styles, list of the number of appearances of
each office and each rotation, and all other information
required to create the test decks must be available to the
office of the secretary of state by the 20th day prior to the
primary or election. If a county is delayed due to
complications related to lawsuits or late filing periods, the
county should advise the office of the secretary of state
before the 20th day prior to the primary or election.)) At
least three days before each state primary or general election
the office of the secretary of state shall provide for a test
of the programming for the vote tallying system to be used at
that primary or election. The test should verify that the
system will correctly count the votes cast for all candidates
and all measures appearing on the ballot. The test shall also
verify that the machine(s) is/are functioning to
specifications.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-145, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-145, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-150
((Optical scan test ballot
selection -- State primary and general elections.)) Procedure
for conduct of delayed primary or general election emergency
logic and accuracy test.
((Prior to the official logic and
accuracy test the office of the secretary of state shall
review the provided election materials with the county and
select a representative sample of ballot styles sufficient to
cover all offices and issues contained in the election. This
representative sample shall constitute the official logic and
accuracy test. This provision does not limit the ability of
the office of the secretary of state to conduct a complete
test of every precinct if conditions warrant. If the office
of the secretary of state is preparing the test deck, the
county auditor shall send blank ballots of the selected ballot
styles to the office of the secretary of state as soon as the
ballots are available.)) If the official logic and accuracy
test cannot be completed at the scheduled time and place, an
emergency test shall be scheduled by the county auditor. The
emergency test must be conducted and properly completed prior
to the processing of any official ballots through the
tabulating system. If no representative of the office of the
secretary of state is able to attend the emergency test, the
county auditor and another member of the county canvassing
board or their designated representative shall observe the
test and certify the results. Observers and notification
shall be provided for pursuant to WAC 434-333-140 and
434-333-155.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-150, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-150, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-155
((Optical scan read head adjustment
standards and tests.)) Logic and accuracy test scheduling and
preparation -- State primary and general election.
((Prior to
all state primaries, read heads of optical scan central
counting systems shall be cleaned and tested to insure that
the reader is functioning within system standards.)) Prior to
each state primary and general election, the office of the
secretary of state will prepare a schedule of logic and
accuracy tests. The office of the secretary of state will
notify each county of the date and time of their test at least
thirty days before the primary or election. The county is
responsible for preparing the counting system and testing it
before the actual logic and accuracy test. The ballot
counting system shall be fully programmed, cleaned,
maintained, tested, and functional before the official logic
and accuracy test. The county shall notify the parties, the
press, the public, and candidates of the date and time of the
test.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-155, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-155, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-160
((Optical scan read head and ballot scan
area alignment tests.)) Logic and accuracy test
certification -- State primary and general election.
((Prior to
all official logic and accuracy tests, a test shall be
conducted by each county employing an optical scan balloting
system to confirm that the voting response areas printed on
all ballot faces are aligned properly with the scanning area
of the ballot counter. This test should also confirm that all
ballot marking codes are being properly interpreted by the
ballot counter.)) The county auditor or deputy, and, if
present, the office of the secretary of state representative
and any political party observers shall certify that the test
has been conducted in accordance with RCW 29.33.350. This
certification shall include verification of the version number
of all software, firmware, and hardware of the voting system
used. Copies of this certification shall be retained by the
secretary of state and the county auditor and may be posted by
electronic media. Programming materials, test results, and
test ballots shall be securely sealed until the day of the
primary or election. These items may be sealed and stored
separately. If, for any reason, any changes are made to the ballot
counting programming after the official logic and accuracy
test, an emergency logic and accuracy test must be conducted
pursuant to WAC 434-333-150.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-160, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 00-10-009, § 434-334-160, filed 4/21/00, effective 5/22/00;
99-08-115, § 434-334-160, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-165
((Optical scan ballot marking code
program test.)) Logic and accuracy testing of voting systems
and equipment -- Special elections.
((Prior to the official
logic and accuracy test each county employing an optical scan
balloting system shall thoroughly test all programming and
system components. The test must at least verify the office
programming by thoroughly testing each individual office,
testing the ballot style logic to insure that all offices are
included on the intended ballot faces, and verify that the
program is accumulating all offices. The county auditor or
deputy shall certify that these tests have been completed
prior to the official logic and accuracy test.)) At least
three days before each special election, the programming for
the vote tallying system to be used at that election shall be
tested for logic and accuracy. The test should verify that
the system will correctly count the votes cast for all
candidates and all measures appearing on the ballot. The test
shall be conducted by processing a preaudited group of
ballots, marked with a predetermined number of votes, for each
candidate and for or against each measure. For each office
where there are two or more candidates and for each measure
there will be an undervote and overvote.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-165, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 00-10-009, § 434-334-165, filed 4/21/00, effective 5/22/00;
99-08-115, § 434-334-165, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-170
((Precinct-based optical scan ballot
counter preparation and testing.)) Logic and accuracy test
deck preparation -- Special elections.
((All logic and accuracy
testing of precinct-based systems shall be performed by the
county during the preparation of the precinct ballot counters
prior to system distribution. As each ballot counter is
programmed and set up for distribution a test of the ballot
counter and ballot styles shall be performed. It shall be
established by these tests that the ballot counter(s) are
functioning within system standards. All ballot styles
programmed for each machine shall be processed by each machine
in order to insure that the machine is correctly counting and
accumulating every office. The tests shall also establish
that the printed ballot voter response areas are correctly
aligned with the scanning area. After all tests are performed
and the machine is ready for distribution, the machine shall
be sealed and the seal number recorded. This will serve as
the official logic and accuracy test of these poll site ballot
counters.)) When a new test deck is required under WAC 434-333-165, the test deck or decks used for the official
logic and accuracy test will be prepared by the county
elections office.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-170, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-170, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99.]
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 02-09-007, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02)
WAC 434-333-175
((Poll site-based optical scan ballot
counter test notices, observers, and log of process.)) Logic
and accuracy test scheduling and preparation -- Special
election.
((A log shall be created during the testing of the
poll site-based ballot counters. The log shall record the
time and place of each test, the precinct number(s), seal
number and machine number of each ballot counter and the
initials of each person testing and observing the test for
each machine. This log shall be included in the official
logic and accuracy test materials. The processes described in
WAC 434-334-170 [434-333-170] shall be open to observation
and subject to all notices and observers pursuant to WAC 434-334-070 [434-333-070] and 434-334-085 [434-333-085].)) The county is responsible
for preparing the counting system and testing it before the
official logic and accuracy test. The ballot counting system
shall be fully programmed, cleaned and maintained, tested, and
functional before the official logic and accuracy test. The
county shall notify the parties, the press, the public, and
candidates of the date and time of the official logic and
accuracy test.
[02-09-007, recodified as § 434-333-175, filed 4/4/02,
effective 4/4/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 29.33.350. 99-08-115, § 434-334-175, filed 4/7/99, effective 5/8/99.]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-180
Logic and accuracy test
certification -- Special election.
The county auditor or deputy
and any political party observers, if present, shall certify
that the test has been conducted in accordance with RCW 29.33.350. Copies of this certification shall be retained by
the county auditor. This certification shall include
verification of the version number of all software, firmware,
and hardware of the voting system used and may be published on
electronic media. All programming materials, official test
results, and test ballots shall be securely sealed until the
day of the primary or election. These items may be sealed and
stored separately. If, for any reason, any changes are made to the ballot
counting programming after the official logic and accuracy
test, an emergency logic and accuracy test must be conducted
pursuant to WAC 434-333-150.
[]
PUNCHCARD SYSTEMS
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-185
Logic and accuracy test
preparation -- State primary and general election -- Punchcard
systems.
The test deck or decks used for the official logic
and accuracy test are maintained by the county auditor.
Information describing the candidates, offices, ballot
formats, ballot positions, pages applicable or planning
matrix, accurate list of prepunches, list of the number of
appearances of each office and each rotation, and all other
information required to select the test precincts and predict
the results must be available to the office of the secretary
of state at the very latest by the 30th day prior to the
primary or election. If a county is delayed due to
complications related to lawsuits or late filing periods, the
county should advise the office of the secretary of state
before the 30th day prior to the primary or election.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-190
Punchcard test deck maintenance and
storage.
Each county employing a punchcard balloting system
shall maintain a permanent deck of logic and accuracy test
ballots. The test ballots shall contain a distinct pattern of
votes. The deck may be used for all official logic and
accuracy tests and for programming tests conducted in
preparation for official logic and accuracy tests. The
permanent test deck shall be maintained in secure storage
except when being used for actual testing.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-195
Punchcard adjustment standards and
tests.
Prior to all official logic and accuracy tests, a test
must be conducted by each county employing a punchcard
balloting system to confirm the ballot stock to be used in the
election meets system specifications for card weight,
thickness and length. The test should also confirm that the
prepunches and voting response areas are being read properly
by the ballot counter.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-200
Punchcard test precinct selection -- State
primary and general elections.
Prior to the official logic
and accuracy test the office of the secretary of state shall
review the election materials provided by the county and
select a representative sample of precincts and ballot styles
sufficient to cover all offices and issues contained in the
election. The representative sample shall constitute the
official logic and accuracy test. This provision does not
limit the ability of the office of the secretary of state to
conduct a complete test of every precinct if conditions
warrant.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-205
Punchcard testing requirements prior to
official logic and accuracy test.
Prior to the official logic
and accuracy test, each county employing a punchcard balloting
system shall thoroughly test all programming and system
components. The test must at least verify the office
programming by thoroughly testing each individual office, test
the ballot style logic to insure that all offices are included
in the intended precincts and combinations, and verify that
the program is accumulating all offices. The county auditor
or deputy shall certify that these tests have been completed
prior to the official logic and accuracy test.
[]
OPTICAL SCAN SYSTEMS
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-210
Definitions.
For optical scan voting
systems: (1) "Voting response area" means the area defined by
ballot instructions on which the voter places their mark to
indicate their vote.
(2) "Scanning area" means the portions of each ballot
that the system scans in order to read the vote marks made by
voters.
(3) "Ballot marking code" means the coded patterns
printed on ballots intended to identify ballot styles to the
ballot counting system.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-215
Logic and accuracy test deck
preparation -- State primary and general election -- Optical scan
systems.
The test deck or decks used for the official logic
and accuracy test for optical scan systems may, at the
discretion of the secretary of state, be prepared by either
the office of the secretary of state, the county, or the
vendor. Information describing the candidates, offices,
ballot formats, ballot positions, ballot styles, list of the
number of appearances of each office and each rotation, and
all other information required to create the test decks must
be available to the office of the secretary of state by the
20th day prior to the primary or election. If a county is
delayed due to complications related to lawsuits or late
filing periods, the county should advise the office of the
secretary of state before the 20th day prior to the primary or
election.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-220
Optical scan test ballot
selection -- State primary and general election.
Prior to the
official logic and accuracy test the office of the secretary
of state shall review the provided election materials with the
county and select a representative sample of ballot styles
sufficient to cover all offices and issues contained in the
election. This representative sample shall constitute the
official logic and accuracy test. This provision does not
limit the ability of the office of the secretary of state to
conduct a complete test of every precinct if conditions
warrant. If the office of the secretary of state is preparing
the test deck, the county auditor shall send blank ballots of
the selected ballot styles to the office of the secretary of
state as soon as the ballots are available.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-225
Optical scan read head adjustment
standards and tests.
Prior to all of the state primaries,
read heads of optical scan central counting systems shall be
cleaned and tested to insure that the reader is functioning
within system standards.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-230
Optical scan read head and ballot scan
area alignment tests.
Prior to all official logic and
accuracy tests, a test shall be conducted by each county
employing an optical scan balloting system to confirm that the
voting response areas printed on all ballot faces are aligned
properly with the scanning area of the ballot counter. This
test should also confirm that all ballot marking codes are
being properly interpreted by the ballot counter.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-235
Optical scan ballot marking code program
test.
Prior to the official logic and accuracy test each
county employing an optical scan balloting system shall
thoroughly test all programming and system components. The
test must at least verify the office programming by thoroughly
testing each individual office, testing the ballot style logic
to insure that all offices are included on the intended ballot
faces, and verify that the program is accumulating all
offices. The county auditor or deputy shall certify that
these tests have been completed prior to the official logic
and accuracy test.
[]
POLL SITE-BASED OPTICAL SCAN DEVICES
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-240
Poll site-based optical scan ballot
counter preparation and testing.
All logic and accuracy
testing of poll site-based systems shall be performed by the
county during the preparation of the precinct ballot counters
prior to system distribution. As each ballot counter is
programmed and set up for distribution a test of the ballot
counter and ballot styles shall be performed. It shall be
established by these tests that the ballot counter(s) are
functioning within system standards. All ballot styles
programmed for each machine shall be processed by each machine
in order to insure that the machine is correctly counting and
accumulating every office. The tests shall also establish
that the printed ballot voter response areas are correctly
aligned with the scanning area. After all tests are performed
and the machine is ready for distribution, the machine shall
be sealed and the seal number recorded. This will serve as
the official logic and accuracy test of these poll site ballot
counters.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-245
Poll site-based optical scan ballot
counter test notices, observers, and log of process.
A log
shall be created during the testing of the poll site-based
ballot counters. The log shall record the time and place of
each test, the precinct number(s), seal number and machine
number of each ballot counter and the initials of each person
testing and observing the test for each machine. This log
shall be included in the official logic and accuracy test
materials. The processes described in WAC 434-333-240 shall
be open to observation and subject to all notices and
observers pursuant to WAC 434-333-140 and 434-333-155.
[]
DIRECT RECORDING ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEMS
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-250
Definitions.
For direct recording
electronic voting systems: "Access device" is the device that is used by the voter
to access the ballot at a direct recording electronic voting
device. It may be a card or other media.
"Calibration" is the touch screen setting on direct
recording electronic voting systems that controls the voter
response area.
"Controller" is a component of a direct recording
electronic voting system that allows the poll worker to add
information to an access device so that a voter can access the
correct ballot style.
"Parallel monitoring" is a process designed to detect
potential presence of malicious code in the software of a
voting machine. It requires a specific number of voting
machines to be removed from random poll sites before voting
begins. These machines are then test-voted throughout
election day.
"Response area" is the area on the ballot face that
records the voter's choice.
"Touch screen" is a type of computer interface on a
voting device that allows the voter to touch the screen to
make a choice.
"Voter verified paper record" is a paper record of a
voter's choices to be verified before vote is cast.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-255
Logic and accuracy test plan
preparation -- State primary and general election -- Direct
recording electronic systems.
The test plan used for the
official preelection logic and accuracy test for direct
recording electronic systems may be prepared by either the
office of the secretary of state or the county. Information
describing the candidates, offices, ballot formats, ballot
styles, list of the number of appearances of each office, and
all other information required to create the test plan must be
available to the office of the secretary of state by the 20th
day prior to the primary or election. If a county is delayed
due to complications related to lawsuits or late filing
periods, the county should advise the office of the secretary
of state before the 20th day prior to the primary or election.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-260
Direct recording electronic test ballot
selection -- State primary and general election.
Prior to the
official logic and accuracy test the office of the secretary
of state shall review the provided election materials with the
county and select a representative sample of ballot styles
sufficient to cover all offices and issues contained in the
election. This representative sample shall constitute the
official preelection logic and accuracy test. This provision
does not limit the ability of the office of the secretary of
state to conduct a complete test of every precinct if
conditions warrant.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-265
Direct recording electronic calibration
adjustment standards and tests.
Prior to all state primaries
and elections, calibration settings of all direct recording
electronic devices using touch screen technology shall be
tested to insure that the response areas are functioning
within system standards.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-270
Direct recording electronic voting
response area tests.
Prior to all official logic and accuracy
tests, a test shall be conducted by each county employing a
direct recording electronic balloting system to confirm that
the voting response areas indicated on all ballot faces are
recorded properly. This test should also confirm that all
ballot styles are being properly issued by the controller.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-275
Direct recording electronic ballot
marking code program test.
Prior to all official logic and
accuracy tests each county employing a direct recording
electronic balloting system shall thoroughly test all
programming and system components. The test must verify the
office programming by thoroughly testing each individual
office, testing the ballot style logic to insure that all
offices are included on the intended ballot faces, and verify
that the program is accumulating all offices. The county
auditor or deputy shall certify that these tests have been
completed prior to the official logic and accuracy test.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-280
Direct recording electronic system logic
and accuracy test notices, and observers.
At the discretion
of the secretary of state, a county may conduct its official
preelection logic and accuracy test of the county's direct
recording electronic system at a date and time prior to the
logic and accuracy test of the county's optical scan system.
The official preelection logic and accuracy test of the
county's direct recording electronic system shall be open to
observation and subject to all notices and observers pursuant
to WAC 434-333-140 and 434-333-155. The results of the test
shall be included in the official logic and accuracy test
materials and combined with the results of all other voting
systems used by the county to confirm an adequate integration
of the systems.
[]
POLL SITE-BASED DIRECT RECORDING ELECTRONIC DEVICES
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-285
Poll site-based direct recording
electronic voting device preparation and testing.
All logic
and accuracy testing of poll site-based direct recording
electronic systems shall be performed by the county prior to
system distribution. A representative from the secretary of
state's office may attend these tests in whole or in part. As
each voting device is programmed and set up for distribution a
test of the response area, the ballot styles, and ballot
counter shall be performed. It shall be established by these
tests that the device and the tabulation software is
functioning within system standards. All ballot styles
programmed for each machine shall be processed by each machine
in order to insure that the machine is correctly counting and
accumulating every office. The tests shall also establish
that the voter response areas of the touch screen, if used,
are correctly calibrated. After all functionality tests are
performed and the machine is ready for distribution, the
machine shall be sealed and the seal number recorded. This
will serve as the official logic and accuracy test of these
poll site ballot counters.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-290
Poll site-based direct recording
electronic ballot counter test notices, observers, and log of
process.
A log shall be created during the testing of the
poll site-based direct recording electronic machines. The log
shall record the time and place of each test, the precinct
number(s), seal number and machine number of each voting
device and the initials of each person testing and observing
the test for each machine. This log shall be included in the
official logic and accuracy test materials. The processes
described in WAC 434-333-170 shall be open to observation and
subject to all notices and observers pursuant to WAC 434-333-140 and 434-333-155.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-295
Parallel monitoring test.
On election
day, in each county using direct recording electronic voting
devices without a voter verified paper record at the poll
sites, parallel monitoring will be conducted in the following
manner: Two machines shall be removed from random poll sites,
chosen by lot, before voting begins. These machines will be
attended by secretary of state personnel throughout the day
and test votes will be cast in a predetermined manner for
results comparison at the end of the day. A record of votes
cast may be kept by videotape for verification. All results
of this test will be made public.
[]
NEW SECTION
WAC 434-333-300
Post election test.
Following election
day, in each county using direct recording electronic voting
devices at the poll sites, a post election logic and accuracy
test will be conducted on a random sampling of voting machines
that were used at the poll site. This test will be
substantially the same as the preelection logic and accuracy
test, pursuant to WAC 434-333-285 through 434-333-290.
[]
© Washington State Code Reviser's Office